Never.The same 3 people who usually laugh at this have stopped.
I think its time to let it go.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Never.The same 3 people who usually laugh at this have stopped.
I think its time to let it go.
I haven’t seen any of Udogie. Is he really only fit to be a wing back in a 5?
I've seen a lot of people on twitter and reddit say that it is because he's an Argentine and we have a "special bond with that country".People that want Gollardo over Ange - why? They have similar resumes and both coach the best team in mediocre leagues
Don't forget the Parrot.I've seen a lot of people on twitter and reddit say that it is because he's an Argentine and we have a "special bond with that country".
Which is silly considering that we've had multiple Argentine players recently that have down prioritized us in favour of their national side.
It would be more correct to say that we have had special relationships with specific Argies rather than the people as a whole.
100%!He wouldn't say no.
Pep at man city
Klopp at Liverpool
Woolwich will stick with Arteta
Ten Hag settling at utd.
He said no to Chelsea.
We are as good a fit for him, as he is to us.
It's mental he isn't already our manager.
You’re right about Ange and Rodgers. So what’s Ange bringing to the table for Celtic that Rodgers didn’t abd therefire what’s he bringing to spurs no other manager couldn’t?I think its safe to say that almost all of this thread is based on hearsay.
Have the people who are crying out for Nageslmann seen loads of Bayern Munich? I doubt it. People are bitching about Postecoglou. Can they really spot the differences in the style of play between his celtic team and Rodgers? Probably not.
Well he took over Celtic after they had lost the title and won it back the next season and got them 15 more points than the previous season.You’re right about Ange and Rodgers. So what’s Ange bringing to the table for Celtic that Rodgers didn’t abd therefire what’s he bringing to spurs no other manager couldn’t?
Fergie win in Europe as well!So...the only similarity between Ferguson and Ange is that they both managed in the Scottish League. While Ange has won with Celtic. Ferguson won with Aberdeen. Before Ferguson, Celtic and Rangers used to win the Scottish Leagues. And after he left...Celtic and Rangers continued winning the League.
There is absolutely no comparison. Managing Celtic or Rangers is like managing PSG. Winning the league isnt that big a deal. In Europe however Ange's Celtic got 2 points out of 18. We wont have squad superiority in the PL like he has in Scotland, so all he does there will not translate here that easily.
I wonder what previous Scottish league winners are doing nowadays? Gerard , Neil Lennon, Rodgers? At least Rodgers has premier league experience. Ange is a complete nobody.
Im saying that people go on about him playing attacking football. Well his not the only one!Well he took over Celtic after they had lost the title and won it back the next season and got them 15 more points than the previous season.
And at the very least he brings an attacking style of football to spurs that all of us want to see again. I don't know why he has to bring something that no other manager on the planet can.
I was wrong on Newcastle. Mea Culpa.Sure
We were nowhere near fourth.
On Newcastle. Wrong. You’d have lost your house.
Again … no issues with any of that because neither were stupid predictions. Nor was thinking Woolwich would win it - they were in an incredible position & City looked like they were focused on CL.
They completely bottled it & the rest is history.
I’m starting to think if his name was Angel Portillio or Anton Petersen everyone would love him."We can't take some dope from a farmer's league like Ange, we need Marcelo Gallardo" is going to be the take that finally causes me to go insane.
It's some kind of bizarre reverse-xenophobia as best I can tell.
I find the Ange idea kind of nuts, but the poor quality of the arguments against are like polarizing me into agreeing with it. This is why the internet is bad for people.
I’m starting to think if his name was Angel Portillio or Anton Petersen everyone would love him.
Irrespective of what you think about Postecoglou, one thing we definitely shouldn't be doing is signing a coach to placate Harry Kane - and Harry is a great player. The high likelihood is Kane runs down his contract and leaves in a year's time, and I reckon he will do that irrespective of who the coach is. We need to start building for the post-Kane era, appointing a coach in the hope of keeping Kane here when he has one year left on his contract and big question marks about whether he will sign on is a stupid move.The difference is that Pep was already a Barca legend as a player and his name had a huge amount of cache. Postecoglu has none of those things. If you want to persuade Harry Kane to stay and sign a new contract tying him to the club for the rest of his career, then hiring an unknown guy who is very nearly of pensionable age and has achieved about as much as Neil fucking Lennon is not exactly the way to do it.
If he was 15 years younger and had the dashy young hansom look I guarantee the energy would be far different in here.
And had started managing in a top 5 league instead of working his way up in his own region of the world.If he was 15 years younger and had the dashy young hansom look I guarantee the energy would be far different in here.
what rebuild did he have to do at century ? They have won the league 13 /15 times recently. He needed to improve their CL record and his failed. Also think he was in charge previous season and couldn’t beat the mighty midytland in the qualifying round. Fucking brilliant!
"We can't take some dope from a farmer's league like Ange, we need Marcelo Gallardo" is going to be the take that finally causes me to go insane.
It's some kind of bizarre reverse-xenophobia as best I can tell.
I find the Ange idea kind of nuts, but the poor quality of the arguments against are like polarizing me into agreeing with it. This is why the internet is bad for people.