I don't understand why this is being framed as an issue of women in football, it seems to me more like an instance of nepotism being veiled under some absurd pretension of women's empowerment. There are women who actually had to overcome enormous obstacles to have a career in football and the notion that this child of some captain of industry, Berlusconi, somehow is going to be a symbol of their struggle is pretty perverse to me.
Also I find it interesting that Gattuso identifies existing structural impediments toward women's involvement in football rather than saying that women ought not to be involved in it. I assume the quotes are translated so it might not be wise to read into his words too much but if this is in fact what he meant then I would think that he is correct, particularly with regard to higher level management in football. I just don't see many women in those positions of power. Also I don't know the most about Italian culture but I would wonder whether women wouldn't be laughed out of the job even at the lower levels of the sport, or discouraged from participating in sport at a young age and so on. If this is the case then again I should think that Gattuso's analysis is spot on.
Now, if Gattuso was envisioning the sort of model for football he would like to see, that's another story, but I very much doubt that this is the case, simply because there is already such an extraordinary absence of women in the sport in my experience, especially commercially, that further diminishing it would be absurd. Maybe I underestimate the extent to which those as devious as Gattuso can devise new means of preventing female involvement though, for as people have pointed out us Spurs fans are well versed in his imaginative communication methods vis-a-vis his exchange with Joe Jordan. I certainly would never have thought to headbutt Joe Jordan, so perhaps I need to get onto Gattuso's level so to speak in terms of my brainstorming ability.