The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
What’s really painful at the moment is looking at the likes of Davinson Sanchez, Sissoko, Moura and Aurier - players that Pochettino went out into the market and signed.Poch said we needed a painful rebuild and he was bang on. Sadly it appears it's too late and any rebuild will likely be without our two most influential players now.
No he didn't. Levy signed.What’s really painful at the moment is looking at the likes of Davinson Sanchez, Sissoko, Moura and Aurier - players that Pochettino went out into the market and signed.
Sammy. You're desperately arguing for people to see the truth that Kane isn't as good as we all think he is.Premier League Player Stats - Big chances missed
View Big chances missed played by Premier League players for 2023/24 and previous seasons, on the official website of the Premier League.www.premierleague.com
19 “big chances “ missed between our front three, Son 9, Kane 6, Bergwijn 4
Not taking into account shit passes or offsides etc
Not taking into account that Dier is average, or we parked the bus, or Winks who was on the bench should be sold......
These are clear cut chances. Apparently according to some though, the PL’s own website must be wrong because they never happened.
Imagine if between them they had converted, say put one more away against Fulham, Wolves and Palace.
We’d be on 42pts, 4th and above Liverpool with a game in hand on the teams above us bar City.
Just three of 19, not all 19.
Between three players, not one.
How people still don’t see our attack as part of our problem is astonishing.
No I’d say people are far more desperate to avoid itSammy. You're desperately arguing for people to see the truth that Kane isn't as good as we all think he is.
Which is it?But if I agree with you, your only solution is to say he should train harder?
You feel that Levy provides his managers with adequate resources for success.
You're simultaneously arguing that Kane is not as good as we think and a bottler over the YEARS whilst also arguing to not change any of the conditions re: personnel he operates in (investment).
Which is it Sammy?
I never said train, I said work harder.Or do you moan that Kane needs to train harder right up until he retires if we win nothing?
Ok Sammy thanks for helping so many see the light re: Kane's specific level.No I’d say people are far more desperate to avoid it
That’s why most actually just stay silent. They know, but it’s uncomfortable
I am a very uncomplicated thinker. If someone plays well, I’ll say they played well.
If someone doesn’t, I’ll say they didn’t.
It really is that simple
Which is it?
Well Kane isn’t a bottler, just not a leader.
And he’s not playing to his best ability.
His solution to play better is the same as everyone else’s solution.
Play better.
If Kane can’t play well because Winks isn’t, well then he’s clearly not as good as we thought.
I never said train, I said work harder.
The whole squad need to work harder, and Kane is not different.
Son needs to work harder, Dier needs to work harder. All of them.
Yep for years, and won nothing when they were peak.Ok Sammy thanks for helping so many see the light re: Kane's specific level.
Sammy we've had these players for YEARS.
If it was as simple as working harder they would have fixed it by now. At least one of Jose or Poch would have. This is their limit. Period. YEARS of seasons show it.
You want to keep slagging off players until they retire because you believe they never worked hard enough if they don't see success here? Really?
That's the best variable you can think of?
But, yachts.The Dippers spent less than £18m more than us on defence. Woolwich £26m more.
That's not our problem.
The problem is all those teams have far greater revenue than us, with the possible exception of Woolwich.
Revenue in millions
Year/Team City United Liverpool Chelsea Woolwich Tottenham19/20 Covid no accounts released as yet 18/19 £475 £553 £470 £399 £347 £40317/18 £499 £582 £451 £445 £386 £376 16/17 £473 £581 £364 £361 £423 £306 15/16 £393 £515 £302 £335 £350 £209 14/15 £353 £395 £298 £319 £331 £196 Total £2.193 £2,626 £1,885 £1,859 £1,837 £1,490
Anyone expecting us to match their spending is deluding themselves, Woolwich excluded.
Winning is a habit. Years of not winning anything will eventually lead you to accept mediocrityThree pronged actually.
In the fitst imstance and in the short term it's a lack of confidence. The question here is whether that's in the manager or the collective self?
The next issue for me is that nobody is pushing up that bar of performance. For a while Kane and Son seemed like they were not just telling with each other but challenging each other to greater heights. That's all but gone.
The third issue is that nobody and I mean nobody is scared of playing us at the present time. That means no free points and we are simply not good enough to overcome the threat that poses.
From very early I said in search of Mourinho's successor, said more because he is not a philosopher as opposed to someone who ordinarily sorts players into a working system. Again not seeing that with us but more because our players are so unreliable.
Stop running away.Yep for years, and won nothing when they were peak.
Remember the title decider at WHL v Leicester?
Kane one on one at 0-0.........oh look he fluffed his lines in a crucial game.
Where have I seen that before
Yep, yep I know, ENIC made him smack it at Schmicael
And that CL final what a performance.
But we won The Who Loves Scoring Against Woolwich Trophy so that means he never plays shit
Oh I think you know how we change itYou know Gary Neville's "Lads, it's Tottenham" anecdote that gets wheeled out with frustrating regularity in the media and repeated on social media by the profoundly unfunny?
Part of the reason it was so annoying the first time you heard it was that you knew it was true. I've been a Spurs fan for 50 or so years and we've had a soft underbelly the whole time. Even when we were great in cups and Europe, there was a weakness to us when the chips were down in the league. As far as I can remember, until the Leicester season, we only challenged for the title once (86-87) and even then we folded in all three domestic competitions.
I thought Pochettino had got us to turn the corner in that regard, even Neville himself said so, but no, it seems it's too tightly interwoven into our DNA.
I haven't the faintest idea how you set about changing it, to be honest I doubt anyone has. Like Pennywise the Clown, it lurks in the sewers of our psyche. Unfortunately it rears its ugly head more frequently than he did
Tottenham's weak underbelly, pictured earlier
I don't, which is why I wrote that I don't have the faintest idea.Oh I think you know how we change it
Spot on Bill. I’ve recently written a book about London football. In the Spurs section I mention ‘Lads it’s Tottenham’ as well as Shankly’s ‘Drury Lane Tap Dancers’ put down and Roy Keane’s players with ‘Tottenham Tendencies’...You know Gary Neville's "Lads, it's Tottenham" anecdote that gets wheeled out with frustrating regularity in the media and repeated on social media by the profoundly unfunny?
Part of the reason it was so annoying the first time you heard it was that you knew it was true. I've been a Spurs fan for 50 or so years and we've had a soft underbelly the whole time. Even when we were great in cups and Europe, there was a weakness to us when the chips were down in the league. As far as I can remember, until the Leicester season, we only challenged for the title once (86-87) and even then we folded in all three domestic competitions.
I thought Pochettino had got us to turn the corner in that regard, even Neville himself said so, but no, it seems it's too tightly interwoven into our DNA.
I haven't the faintest idea how you set about changing it, to be honest I doubt anyone has. Like Pennywise the Clown, it lurks in the sewers of our psyche. Unfortunately it rears its ugly head more frequently than he did
Tottenham's weak underbelly, pictured earlier
It's not a mindset like that though. Squads, and management have changed completely several times.I don't, which is why I wrote that I don't have the faintest idea.
You think we erase a mindset that goes back half a century just by sacking Mourinho and bringing in Brendan Rogers/Julian Nagelsmann/Ralph Hasenhüttl or whoever?
Correct. Damage was done by the board over 5 the last 5 years. Some good signing over the last 18 months but too little too late.Poch said we needed a painful rebuild and he was bang on. Sadly it appears it's too late and any rebuild will likely be without our two most influential players now.