In my defense I have to say I didn't watch them play before and thar was just an opinion! #freedomofspeech
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
In my defense I have to say I didn't watch them play before and thar was just an opinion! #freedomofspeech
I agree with what I agree with. Don't mistake me for a person that is not capable of binary thinking that seems to be you. Somtimes you make a point I agree with lots of the time its guff imho. You're also ridiculously literal. Me naming five players does not mean there are only five players. They are illustrative place holders.If you genuinely think (as you originally stated) that, aside from 5 players, we've had nothing 'bang average' players in recent memory that you're your own kind of "vapid" and are "caricaturing" yourself.
(You're an odd guy yourself.... Seemingly "good" also and happy to post agrees and likes on my posts, but lightening quick to flip to insults and being a proper prickly git if I'm ever 'brave' to have an alt. point of view to you............. I've a thick skin; but check yourself if you're gonna dole out such barbs.)
I agree with what I agree with. Don't mistake me for a person that is not capable of binary thinking that seems to be you. Somtimes you make a point I agree with lots of the time its guff imho. You're also ridiculously literal. Me naming five players does not mean there are only five players. They are illustrative place holders.
I could also careless how thick your skin is, if you are offended by something a stranger says on a public forum ignore it: them, or not as you choose. Because you don't require 'bravery' to disagree about football mate ( I'd reserve that for things that matter)or was that you using allusion. See you do understand literary device when you see fit.
Put it on ignore. It has nothing useful to say.I agree with what I agree with. Don't mistake me for a person that is not capable of binary thinking that seems to be you. Somtimes you make a point I agree with lots of the time its guff imho. You're also ridiculously literal. Me naming five players does not mean there are only five players. They are illustrative place holders.
I could also careless how thick your skin is, if you are offended by something a stranger says on a public forum ignore it: them, or not as you choose. Because you don't require 'bravery' to disagree about football mate ( I'd reserve that for things that matter)or was that you using allusion. See you do understand literary device when you see fit.
hahahahaha this is tremendous(You're an odd guy yourself.... Seemingly "good" also and happy to post agrees and likes on my posts, but lightening quick to flip to insults and being a proper prickly git if I'm ever 'brave' to have an alt. point of view to you............. I've a thick skin; but check yourself if you're gonna dole out such barbs.)
He scored great goal. But hole between him and Romero could cost us game completely (Vardy should have buried that second one, so it could be easilly 2:1). And this time for both chances it was not that he was he was completely somewhere else because it was counter -he was right there, and it was just bad defending between him and Cuti. Also, going forward had a feeling our right side was completely dead in terms of any creation - except his cross for Solanke in first half. But this could be matter of Johnson being a waste machine in possession. Hope he comes back soon, but not afraid of starting Spence if Porro have to rest.
I'd go as far as to day Johnson/Sarr/Porro. I love Porro but he's not nearly as creative as Udogie, Gray or Spence.
We’re rapidly looking at a Maddison/Bergvall/??? combo imo
Complete bollocks.I'd go as far as to day Johnson/Sarr/Porro. I love Porro but he's not nearly as creative as Udogie, Gray or Spence.
But upgrade just one of the three and it can work I think. Porro / Bergvall / Johnson would look ok, or Porro / Sarr / Odobert maybe.
I expect Porro will have to work hard to keep his starting spot this season (which is a good thing). It helps that he's started banging in goals recently. For a while last season I think he was leading the PL for most shots without a goal.
This is it. We have one major deficiency and that is getting the ball into the net. Pretty much everything else, we're good. So Pedro is one of the first on the team sheet, for me.
Yeah ok probably a bit harsh. And having a more creative 8 and RW around him is only going to improve his creativity.Complete bollocks.
Udogie is in no way more creative than Porro.
For all his defence lapses I'd have Porro in all day long as he's one of the few in this team that has the bollocks to force the issue and he's got a great knack for goals.
do you know what creative means?
Porro made 7 assists last season.I'd go as far as to day Johnson/Sarr/Porro. I love Porro but he's not nearly as creative as Udogie, Gray or Spence.
But upgrade just one of the three and it can work I think. Porro / Bergvall / Johnson would look ok, or Porro / Sarr / Odobert maybe.
I expect Porro will have to work hard to keep his starting spot this season (which is a good thing). It helps that he's started banging in goals recently. For a while last season I think he was leading the PL for most shots without a goal.
Ok I take it all back re Porro's lack of creativity.Porro made 7 assists last season.
Johnson made 10.
Over a quarter of our league goals.
Haha. Fair. I meant to write "about".Ok I take it all back re Porro's lack of creativity.
No points for your maths though (74/4=18.5).