The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
fackn ell you meet some right saddos on the internet lol
@ Admin you need to get your house in order mate
#proxyserver
I'm off to bed now to listn to the crickt.
But nevr forgt
Ive got you're numbr. And when I choose (or botherd) to make you look like the prat you are I can. With ease and impunity. (google it thicko)
Purely on football of course. But maybe, on occasion, I might make you reflect on the twat I'm sure you are in real life. I probably won't because I'm not a bully. And you are weak.
But I might.
So you are proposing that the man who just got £86M for one player and spent £120M on half a dozen additions to the squad, is the root cause of the team being unable to string a coherent performance together?
Just what else does Levy have to do to justify that suggestion, do an abramovich and dictate team tactics as well?
This club got what its supporters wanted - that OLD tosser Redknapp sacked (despite having gotten us into europe twice (- one time due to circumstance) and having us play the best football I have seen at WHL since the 60's)
and he got the new Portugeezer wunderkind - despite all of the signs writ large from his tenure at Chelski -
and you are asking the man who granted you your wishes to be sacked?
Fantastic rationale.
He aint perfect...I`m surprised this poll shows a two thirds majority wanting him to stay. Astonished actually. I can think of so many negatives he`s heaped upon our great club.....Always selling our best players, refusing to strengthen in January with Champions league there for the taking, no sign of a new stadium, not giving the managers he appoints the support they deserve, running the club for profit only, and the blatant lying to the supporters "As a club we will always strive to keep our best players" when we all know what he really means is "As a club we will always strive to attain the highest transfer fee possible for our best players". I could go on and on with the negatives, but with regard to the positives, I cant actually think of any.. Yet he still commands the respect and support of 60% of the users on this forum. Baffling.
Course of tetracycline, mate.There's been a few times where his fucking about has come back to bite us on the arse
I`m surprised this poll shows a two thirds majority wanting him to stay. Astonished actually.
At least more people now aren't so gung ho about ENIC. I've been a critic of their trophy return for years, but so many people used to disagree, sometimes in a 'not very nice' fashion.
I was also very outnumbered, and often lambasted (oo er Matron) for my view we'd be far better off with a billionaire benefactor than ENIC. I think even that 'outrageous' view is less unpopular these days, though still generally unpopular I find.
If we want to be serious players at the top table, ie title winners/runners up and/or CL winners/finalists, ENIC need to be replaced or change their stance. This has been the case for the last ten years or more, and will remain the case till they finally depart.
I`m surprised this poll shows a two thirds majority wanting him to stay. Astonished actually. I can think of so many negatives he`s heaped upon our great club.....Always selling our best players, refusing to strengthen in January with Champions league there for the taking, no sign of a new stadium, not giving the managers he appoints the support they deserve, running the club for profit only, and the blatant lying to the supporters "As a club we will always strive to keep our best players" when we all know what he really means is "As a club we will always strive to attain the highest transfer fee possible for our best players". I could go on and on with the negatives, but with regard to the positives, I cant actually think of any.. Yet he still commands the respect and support of 60% of the users on this forum. Baffling.
At least more people now aren't so gung ho about ENIC. I've been a critic of their trophy return for years, but so many people used to disagree, sometimes in a 'not very nice' fashion.
I was also very outnumbered, and often lambasted (oo er Matron) for my view we'd be far better off with a billionaire benefactor than ENIC. I think even that 'outrageous' view is less unpopular these days, though still generally unpopular I find.
If we want to be serious players at the top table, ie title winners/runners up and/or CL winners/finalists, ENIC need to be replaced or change their stance. This has been the case for the last ten years or more, and will remain the case till they finally depart.
The fact is we DO have a billionaire benefactor. I don't want to be a Citeh or a Chelsea, but uncle Joe is very old now and will die a very rich man. Why not invest a few hundred million in the club (peanuts to him) and see Spurs win something before he dies. I really don't understand any ones obsession with money, when it's not used to bring happiness
That won't help us now anyway since Financial Fair Play is now in effect. I can't necessarily see it being used against a Chelsea, City, Real Madrid or Barcelona...but I could see a club of our stature being used as an example of what happens when clubs break the FFP rules.
As far as Levy goes...
It's a frustrating one because we've clearly improved under him to the point where we are now continuously finishing in the top seven and are almost guaranteed some form of European football every year. He's steadied the ship financially BUT I feel like his stepping back from footballing responsibilities has left him a little exposed. It's difficult to know how we're going to make the next step upwards on the pitch.
The right manager at the right time is the difference. Our cycle seems to be - foreign manager performs to a degree but is then removed when it seems apparent that the club's long term ambitions won't be met. Then an Englishman is brought in to steady the ship - cue a season of transition (if it wasn't one already). Said Englishman performs relatively well - probably above the expectations for him (because he's English), partly simply because those new players have had a chance to settle and play simpler, freer football. But they hit a glass ceiling too. So the next logical step is to go for a manager who can match the club's ambitions. Like, um, y'know...that foreign bloke...he won all those trophies?
Add to that - there's a similar cycle going on with our Director of Football position. So far, Comolli has been vindicated in many of his actions at Spurs (though his record is far from perfect) and I suspect that we may see the back of Baldini before his signings come to fruition.
Point is that Levy CAN do more than just keep faith in the foreign manager for longer. Levy could have no sold Bale. He could have dug his heels in and been clear with AVB, with Real Madrid and all and sundry: no, Gareth Bale is a Tottenham Hotspur player and will remain so until the end of his career unless I say so. The phrase 'a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush' seems pretty dead-on, since we used the Bale money early on a number of signings who are the equivalent of AVB - untested in the league and something of a gamble. Had we kept Bale and perhaps splashed out on Soldado and Paulinho (and yes, spent some money in net terms over the summer), the resulting squad under AVB could have been very different. It could have genuinely challenged for the title.
I realise that this post and this topic are days behind and somewhat out of date. But the issues remain relevant because what we're seeing is the renewal of the cycle. And inevitably we'll hit two points with Sherwood - Levy will start hunting for a replacement AND Levy will need to decide what to do with the next big desired player. Do we continue to sell or do we actually use those long contracts as what they're meant for?
Increasingly, my feeling is that the entrenchment of these patterns can be dangerous. Tottenham may never rise above this station as a modest 'big club' that spins money from the fans but never actually has its moment in the sun. And by God - if one club deserves a moment in the Sun...is it not Spurs?