Mohamed Salah is available and would be a very good signing.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
- Status
Didn't we sell Pekhart years ago? I had high hopes for him.
We did. He's fucking rubbish.
Rooney is on 250K a week so you could be close
He would be a good signing, unfortunately he's very much against Jewish people.
A good signing for the striker role would have been that Croatian that Leicester signed, Kramaric. Came off the back of a good record in Croatia, young and hungry enough to understand his place in the pecking order upon arrival.
If only he liked the Jews....
This (ahem) 17 year old has one. Maybe we could borrow Lazio's?
Fuck off he's 17 - he's in his 40s, surely!?
Fuck off he's 17 - he's in his 40s, surely!?
How do we check? Do we cut him in half and count the rings?
Fair point, I think he scored in the few Leicester games I watched and assumed he was more prolific than 5 in a season.
now can we just shift the main cunt:ade:
:adelol:
The smilies list is going to decimated when he finally does go
Ha ha - many people (clearly you and me also) thought so. This from last year, it was discussed on here IIRC.Fuck off he's 17 - he's in his 40s, surely!?
Man, that's one tough paper round.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...r-Lazio-youth-team-proving-hes-17-not-42.html
Surely moses would help part the red Sea at Liverpool, utd and Woolwich and guide the Jews to safety?
Not much he can do if we aren't after him though is there?
Nope. I'm aware this to-and-fro is as pointless as a Cahspurs vs Sammyspurs argument.
I get it you dont rate him, i've seen the best defences of the league struggle to contain him for over three seasons now, he's scored in almost 1 out of 2 games ... If they can make him see how good he actually is then they have bought an absolute top striker. If you think that its easy to score +/- 50 goals (and not even going to mention the assists) in the EPL for a crap team than i suppose that the number of strikers you actually rate is very limited no ? He gets about three decent balls a game and manages to convert a very decent amount of goals but still not good enough ?
He's the best attacking header of the league, he dragged his team out of the relegation swamp and he scored about 50 goals in 100 games as a youngster coming from a very small league.
Either way i hate the scouse so he can fail, just a shame that it needs to happen to such a nice bloke, i'd rather see cunts fail.
Last edited:
If stambouli would have played up front or as a right/left AM, you definitely would have.
Andy Carroll, Lambert, Balotelli and now Benteke. Why do Liverpool keep buying target men when they are set up to play like us -- and don't ever put a decent cross in?
thats the funny part of it isnt it ... They bought a player who's good with his feet but superb with headers and they do not play with out and out wingers that love to cross
I think he would have been best suited for the manure or that lot down the road, maybe those jokes about us sharing scouts with them were actually true
It's not that I don't rate him. However, he has looked rather ordinary for Belgium when I have seen him - they usually play 4321 don't they? I think he's more suited when he has another striker paying alongside him. With inverted wingers, as is the case with Belgium sometimes, he is not as effective.
It's just I don't think that whenever he has played against us he's been awesome
- Status