They should have, but that doesn’t mean I believe Poch would have played him over Kane.I thought you said ENIC should have a bought a back up striker?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
They should have, but that doesn’t mean I believe Poch would have played him over Kane.I thought you said ENIC should have a bought a back up striker?
that's a fair enough point. see how civil we can be on here!Happy not to dwell on it, but as I said, the manager had his go to guys regardless of who we signed, and they were the guys that let us down ultimately, not Sissoko or Winks or Trippier
So far:For some reason I can see this being quoted back at you in the future
Not signing anyone was - it has now been proven countless of times - why can't you just admit it?As I said, we nearly won the Champions League John.
Signing de Ligt and Barkley wasn’t the issue.
But say 2018 and you’re here like a fly on shit.
He has admitted that countless of time in the past actually - unlike others on hereFor some reason I can see this being quoted back at you in the future
He has admitted that countless of time in the past actually - unlike others on here
Dippers sold wolves some young Dutch centre half thats played about 5 times (if that many) for about 15 million (inclusive of add ons) in return
Neither is Donna Cullen youHe's not going to shag you
Hahaha - what? They absolutely did - game after gamenot Sissoko or Winks or Trippier
So the back up gets us 4th and CL final but they should have been better and win it all?Hahaha - what? They absolutely did - game after game
Those 3 weren't back up, mate - they played game after game and to a shit levelSo the back up gets us 4th and CL final but they should have been better and win it all?
So the back up should be better than first choice?
Nice one
It was a mistake, almost anyone looking back at it now would agree, but Liverpool doing the same and winning the league at a canter shows that at the time it wasn't the cast iron, absolute act of negligence by the club that it is painted as. I feel that is what Sammy is trying to get across.Why are you still trying to defend that shambles.
The knock on effects are clear to see. One of the most exciting young teams in Europe to the grinding, lethargic shambles we became last year.
Even Levy's most hard core supporters admit it was a mistake.
Why can't you, just for once, show some humility and admit you was wrong
Why are you still trying to defend that shambles.
The knock on effects are clear to see. One of the most exciting young teams in Europe to the grinding, lethargic shambles we became last year.
Even Levy's most hard core supporters admit it was a mistake.
Why can't you, just for once, show some humility and admit you was wrong
Are the Bale and Regui deals done yet? .. Are we just waiting for announcement?
You said that a back up striker wasn't a problem but yet you acknowledge they should have bought one, which means it was a problem. We'll never know whether he would have played a back up striker in the final because we didn't buy one and give him that option.They should have, but that doesn’t mean I believe Poch would have played him over Kane.
Are the Bale and Regui deals done yet? .. Are we just waiting for announcement?