This is how I've assessed it.
A. Did we address a positional/remit need
B. Quality of that purchase
C. Value
D. Potential
E. Overall
1. "6"
A 6 with good athletic, technical, mental, strong defensive/without the ball qualities, some press resistance, who could also play football.
Our answer was to buy Hojbjerg, who I personally think is a massively compromised solution on all the above criteria, who has glaring weaknesses in his game, and that game has not been fundamentally as a "6" either. Time will tell, if he can be converted into a more disciplined, orthodox type 6 who can improve various facets of his game I'll happily eat my words. The upside is he only cost us 17m and most of that was offset by moving KWP the other way, but for that value of deal this would have been a 3/4 out of 10 for me.
A. 4/10
B. 4/10
C. 8/10
D. 5/10
E. 5.25/10
2. LB
A LB who can contribute to game play and attacking play who can at least defend competently.
Reguilon ticks most of those boxes in at least attitude. The boy has bundles of confidence and enthusiasm. And if you'd only watched his post lock down Europa games you might think 30m was well justified. Having watched 2/3 of his games prior to that (as we'd been linked) I was less impressed with the reality, especially at 30m, when there were other equally viable options out there IMO that would have cost us a third. His technical ability can get bit flustered under pressure, and defensively he can be a bit erratic. his end product when attacking can also be a bit erratic, sometimes very good, sometimes less so, but at least he does contribute and has good energy. I don't think he's the best, or best value we could have brought in, but at least this has addressed a major need with a viable young option who has upside potential.
A. 10
B. 6
C. 4
D. 8
E. 7/10
3. AM
An attacking player who could bring some intelligence and composure to what is generally a bumbling erratic bunch.
I guess many will say Bale ticks that box with aplomb. And I get why, on a name only basis, many will give this a 10. I'm much, much less impressed with PR signings like this, I thought our days of trying to sign geriatric Rivaldos was long gone. I'd much rather invest in the future, by some potential, add some footballing and fiscal value. Even in his prime Bale was not a team player, lazy without the ball (possibly why Zidane won't tolerate him) and that prime was like 5-6 years ago. Constantly injured, we've bought a 31yo player who's game entirely relied on explosive qualities that stretch muscles to capacity. And he already won't even be available for the one to two months of the season.
A. 8
B. 8
C. 4
D. 1
E. 5.25/10
4. RB
Again, sorry to piss on chips, but I do not think a 29yo Doherty is in any tangible way a meaningful upgrade on Aurier. I wish, if we couldn't find a quantifiable upgrade (and I accept on this one there weren't a plethora of options out there) we'd just given Aurier a new deal and tried to find a young RB to be his understudy/rotation. A 29yo who has spent the last few years in a back 5, seems like an odd choice for us, even under Mourinho's lopsided system. 17m is not a kings ransom, and I guess we've added squad depth, but we've effectively just swapped 23yo KWP as rotation option for 29yo Doherty.
A. 7
B. 5
C. 5
D. 1
4.5/10
5. Striker/Attacker
I would much preferred us to bring in a player who can play 9, but also play as a wide attacker/AM. Giving the squad more versatility and making it more likely we will get value out of the signing. There were players out there who fitted that remit. One of them I mooted often, scored 2 this weekend playing as a AM (and is also a Mendes client). I know absolutely fuck all about Vinicius, watched Benfica a couple of times when were linked with Diaz but didn't pay much attention to Vinicius, so in terms of "B" am going to give him a guestimation mark based on what he's done and where he's done it and bits of YT (and will air on the side of generosity)
A. 7
B. 6
C. 5 (based on Buy clause)
D. 5
E. 5.75
6. CB/LCB
We needed a CB with good physicality and mobility, but also with a bit of technical ability to replace what Vertonghen brought. He doesn't have to be a LCB per se, but must be comfortable enough to play both positions preferably.
0/10 (so far).
Ignoring the CB issue, which was least of the priorities this summer I guess, and we may still address that, and ignoring the (diabolical) signing of Hart as I didn't see it as a massive priority anyway and didn't rate Gazzaniga either, I make it an average score of:
A. Did we address a positional/remit need - 7.2/10
B. Quality of that purchase - 5.8/10
C. Value - 5.2/10
D. Potential - 4/10
Overall 5.55/10
I appreciate some of those may go up with time, and some may go down depending on what happens in the next 12 months onwards etc. Just how I see it right now based on everything we know (and don't know).