Graziano Pele
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.
- Thread starter Darnswim 🇦🇱
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Young cute female. Your a real champion of the womens game. I'd rather the food jokes. Respect the threads and respect the women's game you profess such commitment to....but you know fat jokes bad innit...Oh my....just a little pic of a young, cute smiling female Spurs player really got you fired up.
Well, unlike you, I rather see such a pic than read page after page after page of the same food jokes
Looks like Jose will do everything he can to fuck us over.
But then you can't blame him for wanting to keep one of their best players.
Not a big Ligue 1 watcher ..bus-conductor what do you think? I quite liked him when he was playing regularly at Woolwich but he seemed a little temperamental and positionally a little chaotic. Has he pushed on since then?
He's still a bit hap hazard positionally (which wasn't always helped by Sampoali's slightly bonkers tactical shapes) and a bit of a twat, but he has settled down a bit, he had a good season for Marseille. He's got some decent qualities, he's energetic, a bit tenacious, technically decent most of the time, and does like to drive forward and support attacks - and was reasonably productive last season, chipping in with a few goals and assists from midfield.
I think he was jettisoned by Woolwich for being a bit of a twat. They really like him at Marseille (perfect fit - chaotic player for a chaotic club), he's only just made his deal permanent, and I think he really likes it there.
I doubt they'd want to sell but I don't think I'd want him. Still a bit too erratic for me (and the PL possibly).
Na fuck Valencia trying to get him for free, we should get a fee for him, we aren't a charity.
Far more favourable proposition..... Is that on the table? Seems not.
Have you ever watched cricket then...?
The pic(of Ildhusøy) was for football purposes and aesthetic purposes
Yeah, people compare Zaniolo to Kulusevski (in terms of not necessarily putting up great numbers but maybe being a good fit for our system & upping his game) but the key point is we got Kulu on a loan with option to buy for a reason. He was a risk who really paid off.
Seems to me Roma wanna charge the kind of fee you pay for a player performing at a top level for someone who is more promise than anything else.
Oh my....just a little pic of a young, cute smiling female Spurs player really got you fired up.
Well, unlike you, I rather see such a pic than read page after page after page of the same food jokes
You're just trying to curry favour...
He only won the CL with barca bcos one he had mess i and two they played manure who were tactically pathetic in both finals. Fergie was not such a great tactician in Europe as many would have you believe. Remember mourinhios inter beat barca in 2010 final.
I know. Not so long ago the likes ofAirfixx and others were discussing which of their players we'd be cherry picking this summer!
:contefacepalm2:
Lies as always.
Saying "the only player I'd want is 'X' " is very much not as you are portraying.
Last edited:
Amen.
No problem with that.....
The issue I have is:
A) Rich = Prem proven + gamble that he will come up a level surrounded by better players > Fine.
B) XXX = playing at high level but may or may not adjust to EPL > Fine.
....Zaniola is neither A or B.
For EL read ECL.
Mate, bashing up farmers in the European 3rd tier is not a 60m acid-test.
Look at his productivity in the league.... It's rubbish.
Winks has nothing to do with this... Baffling inclusion but.....
The key here - once again - is that Zaniolo is an attacking player with poor productivity in a weaker league.
(Kulu (eg) was a loan with an option..... This wouldn't be.)
I did read what you wrote..... It could have been construed either way. Let's not get antsy.
1st dibs on Romero, Perisic, Ndombele, Reguillon, GLC, Sanchez........? Evidently from the inconsistency of that list of recent acquisitions; it's a fairly superficial concern....
Scouting the right player is the only thing that matters; not getting into a pissing contest that we can't win.
The problem isn't paying 60m for a player.... It's about the right player.
"Trust Conte" is fine; but he's not dumb enough to blow more than he thinks a player is worth.
(See re-quote of myself from a few posts up):
You're talking like he's a sure thing..... Far from it.
Nothing about what I'm saying is rooted in a fear of spending........ If you think so you're missing my point.
Sure.... And by virtue of your list we already have a lot of young 'maybe' players coming through the ranks as it is.....
Conte is a manger for today..... Surely backing him with big money signing means making a stab at the big prizes now and next season; not building for a future that may fall under our next manager?
Sorry to go on.
Nee bother at all.
Last edited:
lets be honest, he should of won the champs league when they played chelsea, but he left their most important player out in rodri which was just fucking so strange. its like he trys to be some sort of uber genius.
He's not on overtly big wages, so no... We should be trying to claw back some kind of fee.
We can't just bin everybody off.....
Ndombele is where that makes sense, because we have 30m still to pay on his wages alone.... GLC is not the same problem.
He (and Reg) is one of the few players we ought to be able to claw back a fee on.
It's a Spurs transfer. It won't garner much discussion (if any) so just scroll on and stop being a small-minded, bigoted tosser (like you are whenever you ignorantly wade into any thread that IS exclusively about women's football... When, even though, as you say, you have no interest; somehow you still feel the need to pass comment).
Last edited:
Deleted member 15314
Guest
Yeah agree completely. I just can't find anything to grasp onto that could make this deal worthwhile for us, nevermind a good value for money.
Kulu had the Parma season, and a good loan with option/obligation deal. Rich had a lot of PL seasons under his belt, so you could be confident that what you see is what you'll get, even if he's not all that special.
With the proposed 10+50 (?) deal, we shoulder the risk/burden of taking a prospect and making him into a top quality player, but we're not paying the price of a prospect.
Not to mention he's got those injuries, and at 23, he can't do a Sessegnon and take 4 seasons to become useful.
Deleted member 15314
Guest
Didn't he leave out KDB in the first leg against us, which we won 1-0? I think he might have been an injury concern, but then played the next league game the same weekend.