• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Agree with you on this one- I really rate him- I know many think hes a c***, but he could be our c***. And he could fill in capably anywhere along the front 3, and for sure would be an upgrade on Bergwijn, Moura or Gil.

I'm not sure. What is Richarlison's workrate like off the ball? He's always struck me as a player that is always on the hunt for space and prefers a free role. So playing in a system where his job involves disciplined positional play may not suit him.

In his last 5 games he has barely ventured back into his own half and averages only 30 touches of the ball per 90 minutes. For example, against us, Dele Alli saw more of the ball in 20 minutes that Richarlison did in 90 minutes.
 
I'm not sure. What is Richarlison's workrate like off the ball? He's always struck me as a player that is always on the hunt for space and prefers a free role. So playing in a system where his job involves disciplined positional play may not suit him.

In his last 5 games he has barely ventured back into his own half and averages only 30 touches of the ball per 90 minutes. For example, against us, Dele Alli saw more of the ball in 20 minutes that Richarlison did in 90 minutes.

He's at Everton- their coaching carousel has been insane during his whole career there. I'd like to think he'd thrive somewhere with better coaching and a bit more quality around him. You could of course be right though...
 
I'm not sure. What is Richarlison's workrate like off the ball? He's always struck me as a player that is always on the hunt for space and prefers a free role. So playing in a system where his job involves disciplined positional play may not suit him.

In his last 5 games he has barely ventured back into his own half and averages only 30 touches of the ball per 90 minutes. For example, against us, Dele Alli saw more of the ball in 20 minutes that Richarlison did in 90 minutes.
Without looking at any of his stats or even watching him play against any other team that is us, hard pass.

He’s all talk no end product when he played against us, and seems to be a massive sook to boot.
 
Imagine being told before the January window opened that we would replace our 2 most inform players in the starting 11 (Skipp / Moura), not get a backup striker and play Doherty as our first choice RB.

In Conte we trust!
 
I really liked Abraham, would have been a great deal at 40m and HG too. Shame Abramovic fucking off didn't happen a year ago. Not sure if Kane sticks around we'd want to pay his fee now to have him as back up, and I don't think they'd work together.

Versatility wise I still really like Leao (Milan) who can play wide or as a 9. Cheaper alternatives would be Embolo or Thuram (both at BMG) who can both play as wide attackers or as 9's. neither are going to be world class, but could give us depth and play instead of or with Kane in a 343/352.
Chelski has learned from past mistakes and started to include buy-back clauses in players they're selling - including Abraham. The fee is apparently £68M, which I doubt Chelski wanna pay anyway.
 
Really extremely disappointing we didn't move for Eze and Olise - as HG they would have been free hits squad wise and given us some really good squad options in attack at Bargain prices.

Really poor business, even if they turned out to not be world class but just decent, for the money we couldn't have gone far wrong, without wasting non HG squad spaces.
I’ll never quite fathom why we left the model of picking up talent from below and developing them. So much of our development over a good decade and a half came about because we were getting this policy more right than wrong.
 
Last edited:
Talk about Richarlison is nonsense, no way he goes to a club where he’s not in the starting X1 and no way does he improve Son and Deki. I think we can expect a young CF prepared to learn from Kane or a Llorente type as back up
 
Guys, what do you see as an option in buying RWB this summer? I doubt that Djed Spence, guy from championship, would upgrade our squad. Maybe a good signing for the future, but we must win now.

Maehle doesn't convince me this season, anyhow he would be a good player for Conte to work with. Lamptey has a lot of potencial, injury woes and height concerns me, but a good option for 30 milion. I think Brighton would be silly to turn down 30 milion, to be honest. I know that 50 milion has been mentioned, but right now Lamptey is far from a world beater.

Cash is another interesting option + home-grown. Atal and Mazraoui should be looked at too.

All upgrades on Emerson, but I don't see anything more in the transfer market that we can afford and is available.
There really hasn't been a big number of hyped right wingbacks this season oddly enough.

Like, outside of Livramento I can't name one that really stands out to me. Maybe Calabria but he is more of a traditional fullback with a bit of offensive drive than a wingback.
 
This is more of an opportunity for squad depth rather than to add to our first team but if Everton were to go down, I’d snap up Calvert-Lewin and Richarlison. Would be good to have a second striker and English as well to top our homegrown quota

Scored in each of Everton's first 3 games this season then must have had an injury because he did not play again until January and has failed to score in 9 games.
 
"we we are only likely to be able to bring in maybe 6 or 8 players...."

RWB #1
LCB #1
CM (starter quality)
ST #2
GK #2
+ Eriksen as an easy deal = CAM / CM / WFwd option.

If can we get all these done we should call it a day and see where we're at in January.
I don't see how Eriksen would be easy, assuming we would want him then it suggests his time at Brentford has gone well, in which case Brentford will want to extend his stay (they have an option for a further 12 months).

If they do then we have to negotiate a fee with them, which decreases the ease of the deal.

Or, we are relying on Eriksen not signing on for the further 12 months (if he even has the option to walk away), which given the chance that Brentford took on him when seemingly nobody else would, I think would be out of character for him, I would have thought he'd want to repay their faith rather than come running back to his former club, who didn't want to take the chance and give him an opportunity to get back into the game when he needed it.

I think we missed our chance at an easy deal for him in January, and I thought it was severely lacking in class for Conte to then go talking to the media about possibly signing him in the summer just after he had joined Brentford (granted he may have been leddown that path by the line of questioning by a journo...).
 
Chelski has learned from past mistakes and started to include buy-back clauses in players they're selling - including Abraham. The fee is apparently £68M, which I doubt Chelski wanna pay anyway.

Yeah, that’s what I meant when I said, I only think we’d be interested if we sold Kane. We aren’t going to pay 55-60m for a pure striker/9 while Kane’s still here.

But we really should at least look at getting someone who can play 9 and wide striker as Conte’s system really depends heavily on a fulcrum type up there, and Son is hopeless with his back to goal.
 
Back
Top