• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

tottcontekane said:
Exactly. All of them are bang average, no matter what some fanboys on here are saying. Neither is good enough for top team.
Also we started well on the market, but we are far far from 8, 9 or 10 window.
Currently we are at 6 out of 10 in my opinion.
I would have change our whole defensive line and our midfilders. We still don't have a solid CM and we are missing such player for long time. We also don't have quality winger who is very fast and can dribble great past defenders and open enemy defense. Raphinha would have been great. We need that kind of magic player.
People keep repeating Conte's Chelsea, but they had a world class Hazard and more balanced team.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Spot on!
 
Airfixx said:
What point....?

If Haaland & Phillips pull up injured on the eve of the season; have they had a mediocre window too?

How about the Goons w/Jesus & Zinchenko?

Chavs.... Sterling & Koulibali?

Liverpool.... Nunez and no-one?


......How many new starters is acceptable?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Lol you compare our team to City’s and Liverpool’s. Should I remind you which club wants to get close to the top 2? So far we’ve added one or two players who improve our first 11. One (Biss) is probably out injured, the other (Ivan) is probably playing, but without him, we’d have the same starting 11 as last season, hence the tweet.
 
The Romanian Jack said:
Lol you compare our team to City’s and Liverpool’s.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Nope... I didn't... Not in the manner that you're now implying.

My post amounts to a question.....

How many new starters is acceptable?

It's a reasonable question.




(However, one would assume Chavs, Arse & Utd all wish to close the gap too; so my point was valid.)
 
Last edited:
Airfixx said:
"Entire last season"

Well that's utter BS for starters.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Taking serious liberties with the fact Richarlison is banned for one game for using a flare too.

Not that there'd be people with an agenda to grind on Twitter dot com or anything...

House Of Cards GIF by Vulture.com
 
The Romanian Jack said:
Lol you compare our team to City’s and Liverpool’s. Should I remind you which club wants to get close to the top 2? So far we’ve added one or two players who improve our first 11. One (Biss) is probably out injured, the other (Ivan) is probably playing, but without him, we’d have the same starting 11 as last season, hence the tweet.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...


People have a point too be disappointed. Don’t get me wrong, our squad is better no doubt, but with Bissouma likely to be injured, we will probably only see 1 signing Perisic start. In the small time I have seen Lenglet, I would start him over both Sanchez and Davies who are both not good enough for where we want too be. Harsh on Davies maybe, but i still don’t think he starts in any of the top 6 defences. Doherty another disappointment that he’s probably going to be 1st choice unless Spence gets off to a flyer. Doherty is a good squad player, but like Davies he isn’t good enough for where we want to be. I got a horrible feeling we will see Sanchez start Saturday 🤦‍♂️
 
Airfixx said:
Maybe it has, maybe it hasn't, but Bissouma getting a knock changes nothing in the grand scheme of things; yet now it's supposedly an indicator that we haven't signed enough new starters and (ref another convo) we have depth issues at CM.

2 new starters as stands is an objective fact in the face of subjective criticism..... (In a months or so's time we might find Spence & Lenlet starting too, but that's TBC.)

So the question remains for those that are complaining or mocking... How many new starters IS acceptable?

Fair question given the comments starting to crop up here and elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I think people were expecting about 4 new guaranteed starters coming in. A RWB, CM, LWB & CB.

Whether that was a fair expectation or not is a different question.
 
Nahkbert said:
You can't really improve on Lloris, Romero, Kane, Son and Kulusevski (maybe Richarlison). I think we did improve on midfield and LWB. Possibly LCB as well. That leaves Dier, RWB and one midfield spot that could have been improved on and only obvious one that we will regret is RWB imo.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I haven’t got as excited as others about the window. I think we have boosted the squad but I really want to see Richarlison get off the mark asap or it will become “a thing” to beat him with. Perisic too needs a good start or else people will question his age.

The LCB and RWB failures are the ones that really have been poor. Hopefully lenglet does well. He has looked good in the friendlies. But RWB will continue to be a problem this season.

I wouldn’t mind another young exciting attacker as I’m not convinced by Lucas any more. Plenty of time left yet of course. But I doubt much will chance before we sell a few.
 
Raumdeuterz said:
I think people were expecting about 4 new guaranteed starters coming in. A RWB, CM, LWB & CB.

Whether that was a fair expectation or not is a different question.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

(Fair fucks for not being a question ducker.)

So 4 would have been acceptable?

......And thus if Spence and Lenglet muscle their way in before too long; there ought to be no complaints then?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top