• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.


Is he massively overrated?

Not really.. I don't think anybody is making him out to be the next KDB.. he's somewhere between an 8 and a 10.. kind of player who could play for the top sides. Gundogan mould..not to say he'll ever be that good. I'd have him over Maddison I think, though Maddison will always put up better g/a numbers and has better highlight qualities.
 
Not really.. I don't think anybody is making him out to be the next KDB.. he's somewhere between an 8 and a 10.. kind of player who could play for the top sides. Gundogan mould..not to say he'll ever be that good. I'd have him over Maddison I think, though Maddison will always put up better g/a numbers and has better highlight qualities.
He would do well (Mac) as the link between Son and Kane…. Always plays on the turn and moves the ball fwd quickly. Maddison can delay and hang onto the ball before slashing a diagonal

I suppose Kane is off so doesn’t matter too much
 
Not really.. I don't think anybody is making him out to be the next KDB.. he's somewhere between an 8 and a 10.. kind of player who could play for the top sides. Gundogan mould..not to say he'll ever be that good. I'd have him over Maddison I think, though Maddison will always put up better g/a numbers and has better highlight qualities.

Is he definitely better than Lo Celso or just in a better situation for him?
 
Is he definitely better than Lo Celso or just in a better situation for him?
Every player is different, some will react to certain environments well, some curtailed by injury. If Lo Celso hadn't been so injury prone and we bought him a year earlier (before the Poch era soured) he could have been a successful player for us. Lo Celso is definitely dinky in a way MacAllister isn't.. dinky as in physically frail, easily shrugged off balance, weak shot/cross. Lo Celso when fit is a good player but he's so rarely fit. MacAllister also seems a bit happier living in England than Lo Celso. Could see him being a good player for current Ars or City.. whereas I think Lo Celso is far too inconsistent technically and physically to make that grade.
 
Back
Top