• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
Sure, it's speculation at the moment, but clearly you cannot run an organisation with the shareholders at odds with each other. Levy owns 30% of ENIC; and you can be pretty sure that both sides want the other gone.

It's a multi-billion pound organisation - and their income is driven largely by commercial activities (including sponsorships, merchandising, and non-matchday events like concerts and NFL games) - followed by matchday and broadcasting income.

It's not to suggest that Spurs hired a 'bad' manager on purpose. But rather that they haven't taken that extra step to sign enough elite players, and pair with a proven coach - it's simply doesn't make financial sense to spend big, when the returns are not guaranteed.

Clearly ownership of the club will change, and whilst that is on-going Spurs are focussed on balancing the books, making prudent investments and maximising value. The premier league - Spurs are never in with a chance, and the prize money is pittance. Europe meanwhile = $$$.
Is Frank a proven coach???? Not sure about that one... he's proved he can manage small teams with small budgets but that is the sum total of his resume... if he was the candidate that ticked all the boxes, god only knows what those boxes were?
 
Less than a month ago you were one of the voices saying give him till next summer at least.

Discussing sacking him was a ridiculous thing to do?

What changed your mind that much??
After the first two games our PPG has remained pretty consistent.

Lot of people have done a full 360 in days rather than months with Frank out. Not just you.
I thought some had gone way too early on the criticism and it was pissing me off given what we'd witnessed for the previous 15 months. Really came across that agendas were at play Every manager deserves a chance. I really really didnt want AVB or Mourinho but once here you have to give them a few months.

But lets be honest, its been brutal, 4 complete no shows against Bournemouth, Chelsea, Woolwich and Forest. Dismal perfomances against Villa, Wolves and Fulham. A meek exit in the league cup. The CL has been ok results wise but its been a fortunate set of fixtures. Personally i wouldnt sack him yet, more for lack of obvious replacements willing to come in now, but a few more defeats and/or shit performances then its difficult to plead give him time. Can we honestly say this is better than Nuno?

For what its worth i feel a bit sorry for him, no Maddison, Kulusevski, Solanke at all, a bungled summer with Gibbs White/Eze and a bunch of preening, arrogant players who dont care about losing. But hey, welcome to Tottenham.
 
The initial fears surrounding Frank, and there weren't a huge amount, was how he'd adjust to the demands of a fan base who aren't Brentford's. That triple substitution at the weekend was telling; he's retained a small time mentality. The embryonic seeds of TMC (Tottenham Manager Complex) are already starting to sprout, and the players look mostly disinterested. Feels like we're here, again, where we're either saying "give him time" or "can't give him money to spend when he'll be gone soon"
Yep, it's the Spurs doom loop... Poch raised the bar artificially too high for those who would follow. Now that bar is being dragged so low that the current manager is trying to persuade the fanbase that a solid 14th placed finish is something to be ecstatic about. Every football club makes bad decisions. But we are the only club that makes bad decision after bad decision. Other than firing Levy, I can't even think the last time we made a good decision. Sacking Ange was a good decision in isolation until we hired Frank to replace him which was a terrible decision. What was the last signing we made that moved the dial? VDV maybe?
 
Last edited:
I thought some had gone way too early on the criticism and it was pissing me off given what we'd witnessed for the previous 15 months. Really came across that agendas were at play Every manager deserves a chance. I really really didnt want AVB or Mourinho but once here you have to give tham a few months.

But lets be honest, its been brutal, 4 complete no shows against Bournemouth, Chelsea, Woolwich and Forest. Dismal perfomances against Villa, Wolves and Fulham. A meek exit in the league cup. The CL has been ok results wise but its been a fortunate set of fixtures. Personally i wouldnt sack him yet, more for lack of obvious replacements willing to come in now, but a few more defeats and/or shit performances then its difficult to plead give him time. Can we honestly say this is better than Nuno?

For what its worth i feel a bit sorry for him, no Maddison, Kulusevski, Solanke at all, a bungled summer with Gibbs White/Eze and a bunch of preening, arrogant players who dont care about losing. But hey, welcome to Tottenham.
I don't think it feels quite so hopeless right now, but statistically it may very well be quite similar.

My concern is that there's no obvious Conte to come in and fix things almost immediately this time around.
 
This is not pro or anti Frank, but It's amazing how the media have picked up on 'Frank's Woes' at Spurs......... But it seems like Eddie Howe is getting a free pass.

He's below us in the table with an arguably much stronger squad, but looks like he's just going to be given as much time as he needs?
Very different. Howe has won a trophy and got Newcastle into the Champions League twice. Yes they are having a down season much like the last time they played in the Champions League... this down to having a strong eleven but not necessarily a strong squad. Plus that had to deal with Isak all summer. I have no issue with the media giving Howe a pass. He has proven he can lead a big side. Frank on the other hand is clearly out of his depth.
 
Last edited:
We are worse off than at this point last season in almost every metric; and had been playing for a month or so without Micky and Romero. We weren’t yet overwhelmed with fixture congestion (although we were still in the carabao cup) and most of us already though Ange was done then.

If he’s doing worse than Ange, with no signs of real improvement then what the fuck ENIC.

Indeed, it's stinky

25-26-vs-24-25-after-16-games-v0-3eemb7atbe7g1.png
 
We could ponder on whether or not we're in fact mid-table and how high Frank could reasonably be expected to take us with these players in general if he got off the ground to begin with. He hasn't.

It's not doom-mongering to suggest that a serious relegation battle would be awaiting us if something happened to Kudus, Romero and another player or two: We're 11th and 2 points off 15th as it is, and metrics still indicate that we're playing worse than that: 17th in xG, 14th in xGA, 16th in xGD, 16th in shots and shots on target, 14th in shots allowed on target.

Any mentioning of Brentford or Keith Andrews in this thread was once considered profane ,but it's unavoidable at this stage: Brentford lost not only Frank but also two key players in Mbuemo and Wissa, and currently have a team where a 35 year old Jordan Henderson plays in every game. Yet they look on par with us, which tells me that even this criticism of Frank of him making us Brentford 2.0 is flattering him. We're not even that.

What are we doing then?
It could be argued that we may as well have hired Brentford's set piece coach as our first team manager, given the circumstances.
 
Is Frank a proven coach???? Not sure about that one... he's proved he can manage small teams with small budgets but that is the sum total of his resume... if he was the candidate that ticked all the boxes, god only knows what those boxes were?
Its worrying to say the least, I was a bit underwhelmed when he was initially appointed, but I just kept getting told how he was the reason Brentford stayed in the league and he likes to play attacking football so giving him the tools here will show what he can really do, and i'll be honest after the first PSG game i was pretty excited, its just since then its gone downhill rapidly , I think its obvious the squad have not bought into his ideas and they appear to be just going through the motions. But what ever happened to the man who said "to not take risks, is to take risk's" I think Frank is a good manager but he needs to be in a club where mid table is a good season, and just staying up is the aim.

The scary part is, even when we get a new manager in we are still going to have a squad full of looser mentality players, its just Spurs through and through though isn't it, you think we have finally turned the corner by Winning the EL and getting CL football next season and we can kick on but nope, its like the team became conditioned to losing in the league last season , what ever happened to win at all costs, die for the badge so to speak?

I look at Sunderland playing in a derby against Newcastle and player for player, you would think Newcastle will walk it, but its like the Sunderland players knew what the derby meant to the fans and left everything on the pitch, its sad to see how we just shat the bed against the gooners when the stakes are higher as the cunts are sat top of the league. Even if Newcastle won on Sunday , i'm pretty sure the fans would have accepted it as the players done their best and left it all on the pitch, we can't say that any more, I have never felt so disconnected from the club and the players in general. Sad time ahead.
 
This only works if you get the right manager, not just any manager.

Ive no real animosity or anything to Frank, I do think he has proven himself a good manager at Brentford - but Ive reached the conlcusion he just isnt Spurs, he isnt the right manager for us.
The problem is that there is no us. Just a bunch of young rich players who think they are smarter, better and who will leave the first time a bigger club offers them a better contract. Create an us over the years. Thomas Frank's principles center on a strong community ("togetherness"), where the best of the team is achieved by prioritizing good personalities and hard work over individual egos, and are built on respect, security and trust. Or you can persist and continue in anonymity.
 
The problem is that there is no us. Just a bunch of young rich players who think they are smarter, better and who will leave the first time a bigger club offers them a better contract. Create an us over the years. Thomas Frank's principles center on a strong community ("togetherness"), where the best of the team is achieved by prioritizing good personalities and hard work over individual egos, and are built on respect, security and trust. Or you can persist and continue in anonymity.

A good manager can build a collective, and quickly.

But he still needs to fit the ethos and ambition of the club for it to really work.

Which was my point, its about the right manager - not just any manager.
 
We should be top 5. That's where our revenue is. Yes, some years 2nd, some years 7th. But average in top 5.

We have no excuses for not having a wage bill in line with our financial peers. Simon Jordan can bang on about banking covenants all he likes, but the Louis family can easily afford what I am suggesting. Not least because they have made a £2bn+ profit on the club.

Don't disagree with your wider point but what does the bit in bold mean? Can't make that profit on the club without first selling it surely?
 
Its worrying to say the least, I was a bit underwhelmed when he was initially appointed, but I just kept getting told how he was the reason Brentford stayed in the league and he likes to play attacking football so giving him the tools here will show what he can really do, and i'll be honest after the first PSG game i was pretty excited, its just since then its gone downhill rapidly , I think its obvious the squad have not bought into his ideas and they appear to be just going through the motions. But what ever happened to the man who said "to not take risks, is to take risk's" I think Frank is a good manager but he needs to be in a club where mid table is a good season, and just staying up is the aim.

The scary part is, even when we get a new manager in we are still going to have a squad full of looser mentality players, its just Spurs through and through though isn't it, you think we have finally turned the corner by Winning the EL and getting CL football next season and we can kick on but nope, its like the team became conditioned to losing in the league last season , what ever happened to win at all costs, die for the badge so to speak?

I look at Sunderland playing in a derby against Newcastle and player for player, you would think Newcastle will walk it, but its like the Sunderland players knew what the derby meant to the fans and left everything on the pitch, its sad to see how we just shat the bed against the gooners when the stakes are higher as the cunts are sat top of the league. Even if Newcastle won on Sunday , i'm pretty sure the fans would have accepted it as the players done their best and left it all on the pitch, we can't say that any more, I have never felt so disconnected from the club and the players in general. Sad time ahead.
I get the Sunderland reference... if you can't match a team technically then at least match them physically or (as in the case of Sunderland) be more physical and combative. We haven't been that club in my lifetime. Always been soft even under Poch. If our opponent could deal with our football then we were done because we weren't winning the physical battle. People talk about that Chav game where we got stuck in but that wasn't being more physical or combative. That was mindless and losing the plot.
 
  1. Give it to Romero / VDV (inside our own half)
  2. Give it to Kudus (inside the opponent's half)
Have been our motto. What would happen if those names got replaced with Danso / Davies and Johnson respectively? The thought alone is terrifying.

Mentions of a looming relegation battle in the context of last season where there were 3 utterly hopeless teams in the bottom were doom-mongering, but it's not as straightforward this year. Wolves are already down, but the rest of the league are fighting tooth and nail to avoid the remaining 2 spots; with some teams like West Ham and Forest in a clear upward trajectory not reflected by their current lowly standings.

Thoughts of We're too good to get relegated and There are far too many teams between us and the danger zone right now are soothing, and the board would most likely take action in case things really went in that direction, but the fact that this is even a matter of discussion is a damning indictment of Frank. For all the comparisons with Pochettino's early struggles, I don't remember thinking along these lines at any point back then.
 
Good point re spending power and time will tell if enic are changing their ways. For now at least, we have a squad suited for midtable i think, unfortunately.

Not to absolve Frank of any blame btw. But it just happens with every manager. I'm jaded really.

In that context; It's not about extra investment.

We're currently underperforming our CURRENT level of investment.
 
Im not sure where Kulusevski fits in a Frank set up, maybe Xavis position? Same for Maddison, he wouldnt be progressing the ball from deep, he'd be starving in the #10 spot.

Solanke though, I think he would be a significant upgrade on Richarlison. The ball would stick a lot more in the final third than just bounce somewhere random...
 
We could ponder on whether or not we're in fact mid-table and how high Frank could reasonably be expected to take us with these players in general if he got off the ground to begin with. He hasn't.

It's not doom-mongering to suggest that a serious relegation battle would be awaiting us if something happened to Kudus, Romero and another player or two: We're 11th and 2 points off 15th as it is, and metrics still indicate that we're playing worse than that: 17th in xG, 14th in xGA, 16th in xGD, 16th in shots and shots on target, 14th in shots allowed on target.

Any mentioning of Brentford or Keith Andrews in this thread was once considered profane ,but it's unavoidable at this stage: Brentford lost not only Frank but also two key players in Mbuemo and Wissa, and currently have a team where a 35 year old Jordan Henderson plays in every game. Yet they look on par with us, which tells me that even this criticism of Frank of him making us Brentford 2.0 is flattering him. We're not even that.

What are we doing then?

Yeah, if we copped even half of the injury crisis of last December/Jan we'd be in a load of shit very quickly. Even Udogie being missing out of that back 5 has had an immediate impact.

As I've said elsewhere I think Frank's been hamstrung by the circumstances of his tenure. Bunch of senior players who consider themselves Trophy winning heroes rather than relegation candidates - so they aren't interested in his message that they have to change everything about their play and culture etc... Don't think there's anything Frank can do about that - you can't sack the players so he'll probably have to go - which will wake the players up to their actual circumstances: kind of similar to Forest's situation this year.

But perhaps more importantly we need to identify, target and secure a genuinely elite Mid in the January window. Someone who can drive change through standards and leadership and passing skill. Who that is...? Locatelli perhaps? But we definitely need a gamechanger in midfield to link defence and attack and help kickstart a new era.

Big ask...
 
Im not sure where Kulusevski fits in a Frank set up, maybe Xavis position? Same for Maddison, he wouldnt be progressing the ball from deep, he'd be starving in the #10 spot.

Solanke though, I think he would be a significant upgrade on Richarlison. The ball would stick a lot more in the final third than just bounce somewhere random...
Solanke will be back for 2 games and out for 10 more. May as well forget about making plans involving him.
 
Back
Top