• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
Almost half the first team were bought for Ange.

Porro had only been there a few months, Udogie made his debut for Ange and he got Vicario, Johnson, Madders and Van Der Ven bought for him that summer. I also suppose it’s easier to play hung-ho madness than it it to learn to be more defensive. That’s one of the worst things, flopping between styles. Pick a lane. If we are an attacking football club, stick to attacking managers.

Otherwise you end up with squads not suited to managers.
So how many matches and training sessions does it take top level international players to comprehend and apply the managers instructions? They don't have much else to do. Like 3 or 4 years that Frank said about Arteta in the NLD press conference. I get your point about the new players coming in for Ange but then they all had different tactics with their previous managers, it's not like they had already been playing Postecoglou's style had they?
 
Unless a mini injury crisis takes a few key players out to make us completely unable to pick any points where a relegation battle becomes a genuine possibility, he's very likely to finish the season actually. With how congested the table is where we're still 4 points off 5th somehow, even something like a 3 game win streak would see us leapfrog almost half of the league while completely changing the narrative about Frank. It's infinitely easier to cling on to these hopes than to change the manager mid-season.

Wouldn't it be a daunting task with this nothing football we're playing? Yes, but even mediocre teams can go through these purple patches where all the stars align. We won 3 in a row this February in the midst of a historically bad season. A team like Wolves, virtually this year's historically bad team plus Cunha and Ait Nouri, managed to win 6 in a row. Happens.

As for the season, we'll probably be like United in terms of epitomising the mid-table mediocrity where winning the every other or the every third game gets celebrated as the manager finally turning the corner. Similar to them, we under Frank could finish this season 10th or 11th with a record of 12-13-13 and a GD of 0 or something. Wouldn't get more mediocre than that.

Would of course be a big cause for optimism because we finished 17th, and Arteta also finished 8th in his first season or whatever.
10th / 11th = instant sacking... how any Spurs fan could think this sort of finish was a source of optimism based on the outlier of last season is beyond me.
 
And there aren’t any so far. General play is harder on the eyes. The stats back up that we are worse than last season. And I can’t think of a single player that is better than they were. Gray maybe, because he’s playing in a position that suits him better. But that’s it. And it’s been six months. We were battered at the weekend by a club that was in the Championship three years ago, are owned by a lunatic and on their third manager of the season.

Where are we drawing the line? I get that we think there are no options to replace Frank, but there are if we pay for them. We’ll just choose not to.
Good post Aberdeen... I hate this "let's give Frank time to see what he can do" narrative like we are some kind of charity case. Forest is a great example. Dyche is their 3rd manager this season. He had no pre-season with the players, has had to cope with the Thursday / Sunday grind and last Sunday had two days to prepare for us as opposed to the four that Frank had. The result, we were completely outplayed by a team below us in the table who looked infinitely more organised, had a game plan and in general were better all over the park. So NO. Frank doesn't get time and as proven season after season, good managers can bring sustained improvement straight off the bat. Do not let Frank or anyone else fool you into thinking this is going to take a long time to sort out.
 
Last edited:
Under Ange, with first choice defence.

Total games: 35
Wins: 23
Draws: 4
Losses: 8
Win Percentage: ~75%

The system worked. That's title winning form. Grey, Spence, Royal, Davies, Forster, Dragusin not at the required level.
This was the point I was making. When Ange has his back 5 we were a seriously good football team. I am not sure where this idea comes from that we got rinsed with first choice defence. It's just not true as your stats (which I have not checked) would adhere to.
 
So how many matches and training sessions does it take top level international players to comprehend and apply the managers instructions? They don't have much else to do. Like 3 or 4 years that Frank said about Arteta in the NLD press conference. I get your point about the new players coming in for Ange but then they all had different tactics with their previous managers, it's not like they had already been playing Postecoglou's style had they?

When its like this its either (IMO)
- they dont believe in the tactics
- the tactics are unclear

Part of management is not technical, its emotional. Its getting players to buy into your vision, your ethos. Postecogolu was brillliant in this respect, clearly.

Then of course part of it is technical, can you get your ideas across? Can you get them to a point where they can act it out on the pitch?

IMO, when players look as clueless and devoid of imagination like ours do now - its because they dont know what theyre supposed to be doing. Which is fine in the early days of a managers tenure, can take a little time for the penny to drop.

How long is a fair period for this process?

Including the super cup I count 25 competitive games so far (+6 pre season), and for me this is at the point where that reasonable period of waiting to see things click is at its limit. We're near half way through the season, we should be seeing more than we are.
 
The way the players have been playing is a kick in the teeth for the supporters, it's not our fault that they don't believe in the manager. There's a chance that if we can ship a few of them out in January and bring in a couple, they may start to get the message that they still need to be putting in a shift, They shouldn't need any more motivation than to look at the size of the supporters that have turned out to watch. When they get signed by the club, their performances aren't conditional depending on their opinion of the present manager at any given time.

Over 60,000 people turn up and pay good money to watch them, and they have decided to put in less effort because they don't like something about the manager. The way and the attitude that they have started so many matches has been disgraceful IMO. The first 10-15 minutes of matches are often hectic with both teams trying to assert dominance, it's like they can't be arsed with that part, and pretty much hand momentum to the opposition.
We can't ship any out
1. Who is going to buy them
2. Who is going to pay them PL wages
We have two assets worth near to or more than what we paid for them. Romero and VDV. The rest we would be lucky to recover half of what we paid and that assumes someone is willing to pay their wages which is unlikely.
 
This was the point I was making. When Ange has his back 5 we were a seriously good football team. I am not sure where this idea comes from that we got rinsed with first choice defence. It's just not true as your stats (which I have not checked) would adhere to.

I think despite the good results with that back four there was still a strong element of fortune.

We still played far to near the edge, left ourselves far to open with acres of space one pass behind us - if not for VDV having afterburners that record would look different IMO.

I think an Angeball-like system can work, but it does require a little more pragmatism and a stronger foundation.
 
So how many matches and training sessions does it take top level international players to comprehend and apply the managers instructions? They don't have much else to do. Like 3 or 4 years that Frank said about Arteta in the NLD press conference. I get your point about the new players coming in for Ange but then they all had different tactics with their previous managers, it's not like they had already been playing Postecoglou's style had they?
Dyche has got Forest moving up the table with what... half a dozen training sessions? And none of these players are his.
 
The way the players have been playing is a kick in the teeth for the supporters, it's not our fault that they don't believe in the manager. There's a chance that if we can ship a few of them out in January and bring in a couple, they may start to get the message that they still need to be putting in a shift, They shouldn't need any more motivation than to look at the size of the supporters that have turned out to watch. When they get signed by the club, their performances aren't conditional depending on their opinion of the present manager at any given time.

Over 60,000 people turn up and pay good money to watch them, and they have decided to put in less effort because they don't like something about the manager. The way and the attitude that they have started so many matches has been disgraceful IMO. The first 10-15 minutes of matches are often hectic with both teams trying to assert dominance, it's like they can't be arsed with that part, and pretty much hand momentum to the opposition.
the players do get away with it, but also look at the home supporters, many appear to go just to meet up with mates or are tourists, we don't as the 12th man, we (the supporters) don't put press on the away team (look at palace or liverpool )
yes I'm a 1970's guy, I still want to shouting & sing with (and at ) my team
 
I think despite the good results with that back four there was still a strong element of fortune.

We still played far to near the edge, left ourselves far to open with acres of space one pass behind us - if not for VDV having afterburners that record would look different IMO.

I think an Angeball-like system can work, but it does require a little more pragmatism and a stronger foundation.
And if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle... you could also reverse this and say if he had Kane instead of Richy then that record would look different too... this win % would be 90. You can't 'if' your way to prove a point.
 
And if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle... you could also reverse this and say if he had Kane instead of Richy then that record would look different too... this win % would be 90. You can't 'if' your way to prove a point.

Im not trying to prove a point, Im offering an opinion.

Even in those days where we did look stronger - I feel it was always on a bit of an Ossie Ardilles "we need to outscore what we concede" kind of thing, rather than we were actually a really solid/secure team.

Yes, those stats look good, but as with all stats they dont tell the whole story...
 
So how many matches and training sessions does it take top level international players to comprehend and apply the managers instructions? They don't have much else to do. Like 3 or 4 years that Frank said about Arteta in the NLD press conference. I get your point about the new players coming in for Ange but then they all had different tactics with their previous managers, it's not like they had already been playing Postecoglou's style had they?
I suppose the difference is that playing for your country is the uppermost echelon of football for many players and if you don’t do what the international manager says, that’s the end of that.
 
the players do get away with it, but also look at the home supporters, many appear to go just to meet up with mates or are tourists, we don't as the 12th man, we (the supporters) don't put press on the away team (look at palace or liverpool )
yes I'm a 1970's guy, I still want to shouting & sing with (and at ) my team

I was impressed by the Leeds United supporters when I watched one of their matches on TV a couple of weeks ago, our supporters seem to be a lot more reserved, and I don't like the trumpet player tooting out the Marching In song, it's like a feckin' funeral. The song only works when something on the pitch induces the supporters to start singing.
 
I was impressed by the Leeds United supporters when I watched one of their matches on TV a couple of weeks ago, our supporters seem to be a lot more reserved, and I don't like the trumpet player tooting out the Marching In song, it's like a feckin' funeral. The song only works when something on the pitch induces the supporters to start singing.
i hate that fucking trumpet shit so much. didn't care for the fates song either. how about something fun and uplifting?
 
Back
Top