If you imagine having an odobert on each side, that's what I think Kulusevski would bring back. There's something about Maddison and Kulusevski that I've not seen replaced by what we have now that is breaking down our attack. It's like watching some trying to bail out a boat with a colander.
If our home form and away form were identical, we'd be comfortably in the top 4 and keeping a clean sheet against a team that is one of the top 5 for home form isn't the crisis people think it is.
This isn't me saying everything is all rosey, but we're seeing some right old bullturds about the 'alternative' options, as if any manager from the past (all of which mentioned were sacked for worse results and football with far better players) is suddenly going to make erratic players not erratic with tactics (even though most of them have been through 4 managers now and 4 different styles and are the same).
Imagine going back a year and saying we'd be playing 4 first team players younger than Dane Scarlett (Bergvall, Gray, Tel, Odobert) with Djed Spence as a first choice left back and Richarlison as our only functional striker and expecting "tactics" to be the reason why we're not winning games with free flowing attacking football. It actually sounds exactly like the same excuses people had for us losing matches and playing badly a year ago
I dont think Ive stated "Tactics" will have us with free flowing attacking football.
Ive not once denied the squad has issues.
All Ive said is - it can be doing better than it is now.
We could be functional in attack, instead of completely absent.
Any manager, at this point, could be trying to embed their principles in the team. How they want to play. Yes, it could be compromised, but its still progress. And if we get to a point where we can make the ball stick in their half, move up the pitch as a team, and offer some actual threat - Id call that real progress. (6 month now and theres no sign of it)
Good coaches get lesser teams/players looking far more coherent than we do all the time. Often pretty quickly too.
We have nothing even looking like those kind of ideas right now.
So yes, drop in better quality players - unless theyre just going to wing it with more reliabilty than we do now what will they have? No support, no runners, and an expectation theyll beat 3 men and put a cross in / win a set piece / throw / corner.
Maddison will be dropping deeper and deeper just to see the ball, at which point there will be a gaping hole where you would want him to actually be affecting the game.
Kulu will be getting the exact same criticism Kudus is now - because we'll be firing the ball up the wing to him, with 2-3 players to beat and no one to pass to.
Solanke will be just as starved as Richarlison is now.
Without us being coached into an attacking unit - with any players available/wished for - its the same shite we're seeing now.