I do not agree in the slightest that getting Frank showed a lack of ambition on the part of the ownership.
Players are often bought with the belief they rise to the challenge and fulfill their potential.
Everything can't be an assault on the ownership or the board because the outcome is less than people want, in this weird and wonderful equation of resources.
You take a decision and part of that assessment is the hope people go beyond and above your expectation. That they bloom and take the challenge on and flourish.
Frank is demonstrating the exact opposite and fears losing more than he is enticed by winning.
The question now is whether the board accept they made a mistake,or do they see that flicker of light in what is becoming a darkened sky and pull the trigger.
I am a great believer in the right man being the right man, regardless of rep/experience/brand etc.
Id love us to take a punt on a young up and comer and have them come good, absolutely love it (full keegan style)
When we got Frank I genuinely hoped he would be Poch like, he would step into the role, grow and really show he can do it at a bigger club.
Unlike Poch, he just hasnt - and IMO doesnt look like he ever will either

( Him not you)
