The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Start Emerson over Porro.
Start Solomon over Kulusevski
Vicario
Emerson - Romero - Davies - Udogie
Bissouma
Sarr - Maddison
Solomon - Richarlison - Son
Start Emerson over Porro.
Start Solomon over Kulusevski
Vicario
Emerson - Romero - Davies - Udogie
Bissouma
Sarr - Maddison
Solomon - Richarlison - Son
Nah can have a walk around the pitch if still here, we have no time to be sentimentalNice idea; but we got work to do.... We're behind schedule due to the Lester & Roma games getting cancelled on us.
Let him have the last 15 or something.....
If the RB is spending more time back than forward, I'd take Royal tbhThis Royal over Porro stuff has to stop. At least this early in the season.
Royal has already done well in an inverted role last season, he can do well in this system where fullbacks aren't really creators.This Royal over Porro stuff has to stop. At least this early in the season.
Royal has already done well in an inverted role last season, he can do well in this system where fullbacks aren't really creators.
Starting Royal doesn't mean we won't try to make things work with Porro, just means he's performed better at pre-season so far and looks like a better fit for the system. The rest is sunk cost fallacy.I think the sentiment is that we really ought to at least try to make things work with Porro otherwise we've spent a shit load on a rather basic, back-up winger.
(............If Klopp can play kamikaze-press-ball in a 433 with TAA & Robertson, why can't we with Porro & Udogie?)
Starting Royal doesn't mean we won't try to make things work with Porro, just means he's performed better at pre-season so far and looks like a better fit for the system.
Probably something to do with Virgil Van Dijk. And when he came back not the same man after injury they failed to qualify for the CL. There is a school of thought that suggests he won't ever be the player he was again. But when he was fit at the peak of his powers he was a MASSIVE difference maker to their ability to have basically 2 or 3 defenders for the majority of a match. We don't have a VvDI think the sentiment is that we really ought to at least try to make things work with Porro otherwise we've spent a shit load on a rather basic, back-up winger.
(............If Klopp can play kamikaze-press-ball in a 433 with TAA & Robertson, why can't we with Porro & Udogie?)
Yeah obviously we have no control over Ange's decision making, we just think Emerson has done better than Porro so far in pre-season and deserve to start.That remains to be seen......... A fan picking Emerson on TFC isn't quite the same as Ange drawing the same conclusion from just 90 mins from each.
The rest of what?
In a financial sense we literally just signed the bloke! ....If anything I'd call that buyer's regret.
That's terrible. It's not your fault, it's Levy's fault.
You've got a keeper we know nothing about yet.
1 CB who is a kamikaze pilot and 1 who is shit (half decent in CB3 and that's it)
1 LB we know little about other than he's more offensive that he needs to be
1 RB who is good defending but awful attacking.
1 of the middle 3 is completely unknown.
1 of the middle 3 missed most of last season
1 of the middle 3 is new and needs to settle
That front 3 scored about 15 goals between them last season.
I'd be worried if that was a weekly starting 11. I'd be worried if that was a backup team in the league cup away to Boro tbh.
Team from last time we played Shakhtar when we drew 1-1 in the 2nd leg and were knocked out of the UEFA cup in 2009:
![]()