Not doing that for me.Admin What's going on with all the youtube vids auto playing? :walker:
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Not doing that for me.Admin What's going on with all the youtube vids auto playing? :walker:
Those are called .gifs, mateAdmin What's going on with all the youtube vids auto playing? :walker:
Listen Sammy I didn't vote him in, or you. You're becoming a cheap shot cunt.How about anyone who votes the same person into the sinbin more than three times automatically goes in themselves.
I see Gibbs has gone in again......let me guess....did he disagree with Cahspur, Joe Clash and CJJ by any chance last night.
Case, its not fucking working.
How about anyone who votes the same person into the sinbin more than three times automatically goes in themselves.
I see Gibbs has gone in again......let me guess....did he disagree with Cahspur, Joe Clash and CJJ by any chance last night.
Case, its not fucking working.
Yes, those who have voted for him did so simply because he disagreed with someone.
People disagree with other people on a forum all the time, but the fact of the matter is those who do end up in the bin do so because their actions were deemed out of line.
Plain and simple, if people will not find the need to instigate conflict where unnecessary, no one will ever make that trip.
Please keep the thread to how you would improve the forum.
This is not intended for bickering.
Make the votes visible, and then sammy can choose his targets with accuracy, rather than throwing baseless slander about the place.Please keep the thread to how you would improve the forum.
This is not intended for bickering.
Who's teaming up? Make the vote visible. The intrigue is unhelpful.Actually have criteria for permanent bans, the sin bin I believe was intended to be a 'x times and you're out' facility but that clearly won't work if people team up on others all the time. If I recall correctly when this was brought up before, a number of people said they won't use the sin bin if their vote is visible.
Maybe have a ban button next to sin bin and if 20 people on the forum want you banned then surely your time is up? At least people complaining the sin bin isn't working and should be scrapped should at least provide an alternative solution.
Who's teaming up? Make the vote visible. The intrigue is unhelpful.
Yes you did... apologies. Vote castI said if...
Let's review your post:
"How about anyone who votes the same person into the sinbin more than three times automatically goes in themselves.
I see Gibbs has gone in again......let me guess....did he disagree with Cahspur, Joe Clash and CJJ by any chance last night.
Case, its not fucking working."
Now you're going to step aside and declare you weren't intending to bicker? You serious? Drop the first bomb, then try to declare yourself a victim? It's on you to stop man, as in each of our "bickerings" aside from the one I just apologized to you for in another thread, you have been the provocateur. Just stop, and I guarantee you this forum will be a better place.
Lets not review it. Please stop quoting me. Im not interested.
People always look who someone was arguing with an immediately assume it's them who voted them in. Which makes sense, that's probably what I would think. That's not always the case though and isn't here. People having to read the arguments are voting too.I see Gibbs has gone in again......let me guess....did he disagree with Cahspur, Joe Clash and CJJ by any chance last night.
Actually have criteria for permanent bans, the sin bin I believe was intended to be a 'x times and you're out' facility but that clearly won't work if people team up on others all the time.
People always look who someone was arguing with an immediately assume it's them who voted them in. Which makes sense, that's probably what I would think. That's not always the case though and isn't here. People having to read the arguments are voting too.
In this example, more votes actually came from people outside of that group of 3 people you listed.
I was considering forcing people to have someone on ignore. Some people like to vote over & over for the same person. If no one else is voting for them, we could force that person to ignore the person they clearly dislike for a month or so. If 2 people vote for each other a few times, force them to ignore each other.
Might help, not sure.