Skip to content

Pochettino gives precedence to system over ‘superstars’

3 min read
by Simon Frazer
Simon Frazer believes we are starting to see our managers philosophy on the pitch thanks to the players who are willing to adapt to his system.

‘Chelsea stays on top of the league as they thrash Tottenham 3-0 at Stamford Bridge’.

This grim opening sentence is an introduction that we have read all too many times before however, the latest lesson at Chelsea was somewhat easier to swallow, all thanks to Mauricio Pochettino’s system which is beginning to bear fruit.

As this article is being scrawled with mildly ludicrous optimism, it is worth noting that Spurs are currently sitting 10th, already 16 points off 1st-placed Chelsea after only 14 matches played. We have a negative goal difference of minus three; scored as many goals as 15th-placed Crystal Palace (18); and have lost to Newcastle, West Brom and Stoke – all at home.

Nevertheless, Pochettino’s Tottenham side are slowly beginning to resemble the Southampton team of last season that were so irresistible to watch for any neutral. Despite the inconsistent form, well at least according to the league table, Spurs are beginning to look like the collective unit which we all envisioned, where our players hunt down the ball like savage dogs and then counter-attack at frenetic pace.

As any rationale Spurs fan would accept, Poch’s philosophy was going to take time to implement into the team. It has been very disappointing to see senior players such as club captain Younes Kaboul and his deputy, Emmanuel Adebayor, respond so poorly to the new manager’s system. But, what eclipses this setback in the campaign has been the continuing development of three academy players who have all bought into Poch’s vision – Ryan Mason, Nabil Bentaleb and Harry Kane.

Poch has stuck to his ideologies despite the pressure that came with some poor results. Rather than discarding his system that worked so seamlessly St Mary’s, Poch has identified players who will follow instructions, players who are committed to the cause, players that want to play for Tottenham, players who care about Tottenham.

Who would’ve thought in pre-season that Mason and Bentaleb would shield the back four, whilst Kane lead the attack at Chelsea? Moreover, who would’ve thought in pre-season that Bentaleb and Kane would be Spurs’ best players on the pitch at Stamford Bridge?

[fullquote]Spurs are beginning to look like the collective unit which we all envisioned, where our players hunt down the ball like savage dogs and then counter-attack at frenetic pace.[/fullquote]

The young Algerian is an imposing player; he passes the ball quickly; reads the game well; and is technically astute. Unlike his senior counterparts Etienne Capoue, Paulinho and Moussa Dembele, who take far too many touches and therefore far too long to release the ball, Bentaleb has the ability to enable a quick transition from defence to attack.

Like every good striker, Harry Kane has a nose for goal, but what he does not get enough credit for is his football brain. Kane runs into space effectively and has the ability to drag opposition defenders out of position. In addition, and unlike his head, his touch is elegant.

Contrasting Kaboul, who submitted to Man City after giving away a foolish penalty – Mason has heart – something very scarce amid an unbalanced squad of largely average players. He gets stuck in and isn’t afraid to throw his weight around; his confrontation with Christian Benteke at Villa arguably turned the game around. It at least sparked Spurs into life.

Spurs fans have been criticised for the lack of home support, but fans feed off players who they can see are putting in a shift. The atmosphere at the Lane against Everton was brilliant on Sunday. How brilliant was it to see Roberto Soldado finally slot one into the net? What’s more special about the goal was the fact that it was straight out of the Pochettino textbook.

Soldado’s winning goal against Everton started from the enthusiasm of Kane, who was willing to drop back and rob Gareth Barry of possession in midfield, before passing to Lennon who countered with speed. The Spaniard got his name on the scoresheet but there were four other players in Tottenham shirts ready to put the ball in the net.

Poch should be credited for sticking to a system rather than succumbing to a squad of players who have now seen three managers in the space of twelve months. If it means sticking to home-grown products who are willing to adapt to a system, rather than expensive imported “superstars”, then so be it.

All views and opinions expressed in this article are the views and opinions of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of The Fighting Cock. We offer a platform for fans to commit their views to text and voice their thoughts. Football is a passionate game and as long as the views stay within the parameters of what is acceptable, we encourage people to write, get involved and share their thoughts on the mighty Tottenham Hotspur.

3 Comments

  1. Bob
    06/12/2014 @ 2:54 pm

    If it means sticking to home-grown products who are willing to adapt to a system, rather than expensive imported “superstars”, then so be it………. too bloody right!! COYS!!

  2. Frank de Boer
    07/12/2014 @ 12:06 am

    This article simply has to be a wind-up. The “system” fails week in week out yet one win and the system is somehow trumpeted as working. Let me explain to you what the system is and why it is doomed to failure. I will call it a “high 3” where three players start just behind a lone centre forward. As long as the opposition pull their left and right midfielders back 10 yards, to stop their back four being four on four, when we have the ball it is very easy to defend against. Then when they have the ball they can break at pace as there will be huge gaps, especially down our flanks, to run at. QPR played three at the back, Southampton missed a sitter to equalise and Everton looked jaded following a tough game in Germany. The other five teams (Liverpool, West Brom, Newcastle, Stoke and Palace) all did their homework and totally outplayed us and but for Lloris we would have conceded even more goals.

    Eriksen is generally accepted as being our best outfield player and is a central midfield player if ever I saw one. To play him left is both ridiculous and a waste. Lamela is a left footed winger so to have him tucked in right is plain stupid. Kane is a centre forward so why put him in the middle of the three. The system encourages players to interchange but ends up making us very narrow and hence the complete lack of crosses. Soldado thrives on getting on the end of crosses into the six yard box yet we don’t get down the wings so he’s got no chance.

    The system is also causing us to play cautious with the ball being knocked along our back four which is great for the possession stats but allows the opposition to regroup. As for throw-ins and free-kicks in the opposing half coming backwards (the Manager must be instructing this as I don’t see him objecting when it happens) demonstrates a compete lack of attacking intent.

    Today was yet another low point with Palace attacking with pace leading to lots of shots and corners etc but only 32% possession proving it’s not having the ball that counts but what you do with it. As for Pochettino’s substitutions, they were embarrassing. Chadli for Lamela added nothing, Paulinho for Mason was just like-for-like and finally Lennon given only nine minutes and replacing our centre forward who surely he was bought on to cross to.

    The sooner the system is ditched the better and if Pochettino continues to stubbornly persist with it then he will have to go instead.

  3. Betty
    08/12/2014 @ 5:37 am

    Ooh Frank, do behave.

    A club is bigger than its players, and a manager has to match the players to his system.

    Look at Alf – not Garnett, but Ramsey. He took Jimmy ‘Sticks’ Leadbetter, who looked twice as old as he was, and played his as a withdrawn winger who angled crosses in to the rugged but hardly subtle Ted Phillips and the nippy Ray Crawford – England’s finest forward apart from Greavsie. This group of odds & sods who were playing in the Third Division only five years earlier knocked us off our perch in ’62 and were the prototypes of his ‘wingless wonders’ who hit gold in ’66.

    The point being that it was the system that was successful and the distinctly average players fitted into it and executed it perfectly.

    We don’t need ‘fancy dans’ with colourful ballet shoes, we need players who will submit to the managers’ authority and undoubted talents and who will – as a team – reap the results.

    Now, dear, put your beret back on and go and give us some more laughs.
    Love, Betty.

Would you like to write for The Fighting Cock?