indeed, as the point in case was without dembele
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
You have yet to establish that any of the data is flawed.But there's no way that can be predicted, least of all on flawed data comparisons.
Glyfi plays for a team that are so reliant on him, he's got practically a free role in a direct passing team. Barkley plays for a Koeman team that just would not flatter gylfi in the slightest.
You could find stats that make Barkley look better than Glyfi, but it's not in an Everton fans interest to do so.
Would love to know who in our first eleven people are saying we need to improve on, vs the competition. And how we could.With the exception of Chelsea, all of those teams have serious weak-points that require improvement to their first 11.
Our weakest area is squad cover and depth, not issues with our first 11.
New = VecinoDembele is probably my favourite player but if we get a fast paced attacking player (similar to mane) Poch could easily play a variation of the 3 at the back but slightly tweaked..
--------------------------Lloris----------------------------
-------Dier-------Alderweireld--Vertonghen----
Walker-------------Wanyama---------------Rose--
---------------Eriksen--------------New--------------
-------------------------Alli--------------------------------
--------------------------------Kane------------------
Of course Mousa would probably start the games against harder opposition (especially away) being that he is so good. Either way we need to target players that can definitely challenge for a starting spot (Barkley is not on that level).
Dembele is probably my favourite player but if we get a fast paced attacking player (similar to mane) Poch could easily play a variation of the 3 at the back but slightly tweaked..
--------------------------Lloris----------------------------
-------Dier-------Alderweireld--Vertonghen----
Walker-------------Wanyama---------------Rose--
---------------Eriksen--------------New--------------
-------------------------Alli--------------------------------
--------------------------------Kane------------------
Of course Mousa would probably start the games against harder opposition (especially away) being that he is so good. Either way we need to target players that can definitely challenge for a starting spot (Barkley is not on that level).
Never really had backup for Mane, so i disagree, we needed to spend up front regardless whether we needed defenders. It's actually quite strange that people think we won't spend big on our defense now that we signed Salah. Its well-documented hat we have considerable money to spend. I expect another center back and left back to sign in the next 3 weeks.Salah is a top player and a grade A cunt. I hadn't seen that costa all that huch so I can't remark on him but Salah will fit Liverpool's system perfectly.
The thing is it was never up front where they really needed to splash the money
Definitely wouldn't say no to this. Maybe an alternative to Lemar?
A lot of talk about Adrien Silva as well.. he'd be a good addition.
The way our window usually goes, every player we have mentioned won't come and it'll be others who are a complete surprise (like Son) or a real let down (Sissoko, Fraiser Campbell)
Never really had backup for Mane, so i disagree, we needed to spend up front regardless whether we needed defenders. It's actually quite strange that people think we won't spend big on our defense now that we signed Salah. Its well-documented hat we have considerable money to spend. I expect another center back and left back to sign in the next 3 weeks.
Wouldn't judge him totally on playing for the most boring National team in existence though. I like him, he's versatile player too, plays all the central midfield roles from DM to number 10, I prefer him futher forwardAdrien Silva starting in central midfield for Portugal against Russia at 4pm.
Will be interesting to get another look at him considering we are after him.
Don't know him. It seems only Italian media are on it. From what i've seen from Italian media is they always seem to report on something that never happens. I am struggling to think of a single transfer story that has actually happened.New = Vecino
according to Italian media.
Probably most of you guys do not even know who he is but I assure he would be a great addition.
His buyout clause is € 24M
If you go and spend £100m+ on 3 players and don't win anything, where does that leave Klopp?
Don't they have about a dozen papers that only do sport in Italy? They have to print something every day I guess.Wouldn't judge him totally on playing for the most boring National team in existence though. I like him, he's versatile player too, plays all the central midfield roles from DM to number 10, I prefer him futher forward
Don't know him. It seems only Italian media are on it. From what i've seen from Italian media is they always seem to report on something that never happens. I am struggling to think of a single transfer story that has actually happened.
Tottenham looking to sign Fiorentina midfielder Matias Vecino | Sportslens
"My favourite way to test this using data is by seeing where players receive the ball on the pitch.
I’ve split the pitch into twelve positional zones and used a machine learning method called k-means clustering to group players together who receive the ball in similar areas.
This puts Sigurdsson in a group with the likes of Ozil, Coutinho, Silva, Firmino and Rooney.
Barkley fits in with a group of players (Ramsey, Steven Davis, Wijnaldum and Pogba) who receive the ball in more orthodox central midfield areas rather than further upfield ‘in the hole’.
Nominally, Sigurdsson is more of a 10 than Barkley. Actually, however, the difference between the two is pretty small with both lying on the edge of their clusters about to overlap. Do they play in the same position? Most of the time, yes."
You can see Barkley there trying more vertical passes from deeper central positions while Sigurdsson is all about putting the ball in the box from out wide.
You don’t trust my model!? Here’s the top 5: Alexis Sanchez, De Bruyne, Ozil, Fabregas, Hazard. And you don’t have to play for an elite team to get amongst this lot. Tadic, Deulofeu and Payet are right behind them.
Essentially, Barkley and Sigurdsson just aren’t that good at consistent, high quality chance creation in open play. Neither get into, or pick people out in the box enough. Yellow arrows are assists:
Barkley’s had an elite forward in Lukaku to convert the chances he has delivered into actual assists for goals. Sigurdsson’s had…well, we’ll just leave it there.
...because Siggy has scored more free kick from taking more free kicks.Again the difference between the two players shows in dead ball situations. Again, Sigurdsson is king:
Barkley not only wins the ball back a lot more than Sigurdsson but in much deeper areas too:
After just a short dive into the data, it’s becoming clear that these two players’ roles haven’t been that similar at all in the last two seasons.
This is a great comparison of Gylfi Sigurdsson and Ross Barkley. Also a great example of why I really, really, really don't want us to sign Ross Barkley:
The Data Scout – Gylfi Sigurdsson v Ross Barkley (Extended Version)
I rather trust Paul's judgement over yours, because he's willing to write stuff down and argue a case, rather than just say it isn't good enough.
You have yet to establish that any of the data is flawed.
I don't disagree that Gylfi and Barkley play in very different teams. I don't know of many players that would be flattered by Koeman's style of play, but that wasn't the point of the exercise. Paul did not actually try to make Gylfi look better than Barkley, either. He rather explicitly says that they don't play the same way, and Sigurdsson would not be an improvement on Barkley.
If it's not in an Everton fan's interest to find those stats, why does Paul in that article both do so, and point them out?
For that matter, did you read the article I linked?