• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers January 2020 transfer thread

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Status
Not open for further replies.
Five said:
Nice to see your Yankee Doodle ass win at least one fucking round, Chief Convoluted Prose.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
????
iu
 
Tottenham Sean said:
These stats graphs confuse me
Cant we just grade players with my guide below.
1. West ham standard
2. Couldn't hit Cows arse with a shovel
3. He'll do ,if no one else available
4. Not bad as it goes.
5.Very good striker
6. He's almostHarry Kane!
7. Almost as good as i was in The John Warner "2nd 11" circa 1979-1983.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Those are very advanced stats and unfortunately don't have the technology to track them yet.
:levywhoa:
 
Tottenham Sean said:
These stats graphs confuse me
Cant we just grade players with my guide below.
1. West ham standard
2. Couldn't hit Cows arse with a shovel
3. He'll do ,if no one else available
4. Not bad as it goes.
5.Very good striker
6. He's almostHarry Kane!
7. Almost as good as i was in The John Warner "2nd 11" circa 1979-1983.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I’d prefer:

1. Good.
2. Not good.

It makes it easier for me at my advancing age.
 
Tottenham Sean said:
These stats graphs confuse me
Cant we just grade players with my guide below.
1. West ham standard
2. Couldn't hit Cows arse with a shovel
3. He'll do ,if no one else available
4. Not bad as it goes.
5.Very good striker
6. He's almostHarry Kane!
7. Almost as good as i was in The John Warner "2nd 11" circa 1979-1983.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
You’ve missed out ‘as good as Adam Martin who scored 3 in an England trial but never got in, for some reason’ (1985 if you wanted to know)
 
Tottenham Sean said:
These stats graphs confuse me
Cant we just grade players with my guide below.
1. West ham standard
2. Couldn't hit Cows arse with a shovel
3. He'll do ,if no one else available
4. Not bad as it goes.
5.Very good striker
6. He's almostHarry Kane!
7. Almost as good as i was in The John Warner "2nd 11" circa 1979-1983.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

From my newfound Willian Jose expert status (read a few opinions on here), I think i'll go with 4
 
William Jose is okay.

Definitely not worth the money but that's the price you pay when you say you need a striker and have pretty much said as much in the media.

Weird we'd be willing to go for him over Piatek, who's cheaper though and 4 years younger.
 
MVP said:
I don't think those 3 are Levy's influence in particular, I think Poch wanted them but Clarke was clearly a punt for Levy not for Poch. I don't think Poch had any intention of using Clarke at all.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

LOL... Classic!

So after 3 pages of 'Poch has no major influence on incoming players'... (See Levy as defacto DOF conversation)

.....APART from if it comes to an outlay of 140m worth of players intended to replenish the first team and one is building a case to criticize Levy for taking a punt on a teenage prospect.

Gotcha! :adethumbup:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top