So he doesn't receive service when it's convenient to say so and when it fits the narrative.
Got it.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane
- Thread starter Moulman14
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Got it.
No you obviously haven't got it - which will come as no surprise to anybody - read this ten times very slowly, then find a child to explain it to you
All strikers - receive - a different - level of service - in every game - they play - on average - the stronger - the opponent - the less service - the striker - will receive.
Once you've fully grasped this basic footballing principle you will have answered your own question.
So Kane scores goals because he receives great service
This is probably also the reason why Vinicius scored 10 goals in 1000 mins last season
Because Spurs provide their strikers with great service
Got it
Saying - Got it - when you obviously haven't, that doesn't help.
Come on - find a child to explain it to you - you can learn this don't give up - start with the very basics.
Repeat after me - Not every game is the same
See now you've "Got It" ..... baby steps
Ahh I see - you think you're Joe Biden - a lot of your 'aberrations' making sense now - best go lie down and maybe stop answering any questions ... there's a dear fellow.
Isn’t it funny when I put up a clip of Steve Nicol directly after the CL final reviewing the game and saying Spurs didn’t have anything to work with because Kane wasn’t making any runs or finding any space and that Spurs played the game with ten men because Kane wasn’t fit, it meant fuck all.
But the bbc says Kane headed out loads of corners against City and that means he was majestic and world class
:nunofacepalm:
He’s not a spurs fan
There was no service and it didn’t happen
He didn’t call Kane a dribbling mess, and saying “I took it back” means fuck all.
You started personally abusing the player.
A Spurs fan can have a harsh opinion on Kane’s football. No Spurs fan should say what you did.
You’re right, I’m not. You can quote me on that. I’m a weird Asian/Australian guy that supports Woolwich and know more about kangaroos than football. So wtf you gonna do about it? Complain some more.
Last edited:
Why? read the post you are responding to where it clearly says -
"just because something is quoted doesn't mean it's true"
Nobody said that the media or the journalist were correct, just that they were the ones who made the statement - you do seem to lack a grasp of basic comprehension - when it was simply pointed out to you that the comments were a quote, not necessarily the views of the poster, you came up with this but when I said nonsense ... again why? aren't you agreeing?
No. Laugh at the wreck that is your lifeYou’re right, I’m not. You can quote me on that. I’m a weird Asian/Australian guy that supports Woolwich and know more about kangaroos than football. So wtf you gonna do about it? Complain some more.
Goodbye, Sol Campbell.
Be quiet you dribbling gooner mess before you get burned.
You’ve humiliated yourself time and time again and it’s time to put you on ignore.
Goodbye Sammy you gooner troll.
Victory is mine! Ended Ndombumbum and SammyGoon in decisive fashion!
Nah, you crossed the line….you were only “sorry” because he stayed.Be quiet you dribbling gooner mess before you get burned.
You’ve humiliated yourself time and time again and it’s time to put you on ignore.
Goodbye Sammy you gooner troll.
Victory is mine! Ended Ndombumbum and SammyGoon in decisive fashion!
Saying he’s not world class is ok.
What you said will never be.
Ahhhh so you posted it……then told me it was “the media” when I questioned it……now it might not even be correct.
Haha
What? ..... are you NdomBellEnd in disguise? Do I need small words for you as well?
A quote is the opinion of the person who wrote the quote - I posted quotes to show how the media viewed the tactical display and, to counter your negative view, how they highlighted Kane's positive contribution - at no point did I say you had to agree with the media.
I would hope you already knew my view - Kane is in my opinion a top quality striker, he was then and he is now - you've disagreed with that often enough so you should know it.
You're a big boy/girl so make up you own mind. Jeez come on ............
So what you’re saying is Lucas Moura > Kane in the CL final? Got it
Quite late to the discussion but I don't harbour any ill feelings towards Kane. I'd even say I think many fans are/were being unfair.
Nearly everyone agreed that he had earned the right to move away, the issue for some was the way he went about it.
I can't say I blame him though. In reality he had to do something, just like Modric and Berba did when they wanted to leave. Doing it all behind closed doors wouldn't work, it's like telling protesters to not cause a nuisance and thus totally defeat the purpose of it all.
Kane's level is challenging for the league/CL. We're miles away from that and made no effort to get close to being able to do so. The club know this. So the right thing to do would have been to let him go. Why should our lack of ambition stop him? Keeping him is unfair. I feel it was Levy's ego and wanting to keep a star player to help justify the absurd prices for midtable and ECL football.
Saying Kane shouldn't have signed such a big deal is also a bit disingenuous. He signed it because he acted like a fan (stupidly) and put faith in the project, at the time he signed it he most certainly could have gone anywhere. Yes it was dumb but let's not mock him for being loyal then if we're also going to claim he's being disloyal now.
The gentleman's agreement was indeed silly, and I laughed at the pisstake memes too. But in reality it's a promise that was broken. That's not cool. Charlie is a cringey prat though.
To those who say Kane owes us since we made him- just no. He more than paid us back. And don't forget it works both ways, if Kane wasn't any good he'd get turfed.
Kane's been DESPERATE to win things with us and remained wholly consistent in saying he wanted to stay so long as the club show ambition aka surround him with players closer to his level.
Nearly everyone agreed that he had earned the right to move away, the issue for some was the way he went about it.
I can't say I blame him though. In reality he had to do something, just like Modric and Berba did when they wanted to leave. Doing it all behind closed doors wouldn't work, it's like telling protesters to not cause a nuisance and thus totally defeat the purpose of it all.
Kane's level is challenging for the league/CL. We're miles away from that and made no effort to get close to being able to do so. The club know this. So the right thing to do would have been to let him go. Why should our lack of ambition stop him? Keeping him is unfair. I feel it was Levy's ego and wanting to keep a star player to help justify the absurd prices for midtable and ECL football.
Saying Kane shouldn't have signed such a big deal is also a bit disingenuous. He signed it because he acted like a fan (stupidly) and put faith in the project, at the time he signed it he most certainly could have gone anywhere. Yes it was dumb but let's not mock him for being loyal then if we're also going to claim he's being disloyal now.
The gentleman's agreement was indeed silly, and I laughed at the pisstake memes too. But in reality it's a promise that was broken. That's not cool. Charlie is a cringey prat though.
To those who say Kane owes us since we made him- just no. He more than paid us back. And don't forget it works both ways, if Kane wasn't any good he'd get turfed.
Kane's been DESPERATE to win things with us and remained wholly consistent in saying he wanted to stay so long as the club show ambition aka surround him with players closer to his level.