Didn’t sound like you thought Conte was the best last night at all.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
We could have taken him off and left Bergwin on instead , who had scored and was played generally well anyway. Theres just no need to overplay Kane who already runs like hes knackered from the start of games.
But the poor team, manager and tactics is why Kane was losing finals and semis back then too?
No you don’t care about the clubs record without this player. I do
Difference between turning up against West Brom in the league and Utd in a semi final
Bergwijn doesn’t play well or score often despite doing that last night. See how it works.
No I said he was declining, I didn’t say he wouldnt score against crap
Are you people so sensitive that not wanting Winks on means you want Conte sacked?Didn’t sound like you thought Conte was the best last night at all.
Are you people so sensitive that not wanting Winks on means you want Conte sacked?
Poch regressed unless you think 26oys from 25 games and not winning a league game in the road is a reason to keep him
My sentiment is towards the club, you’re still crying years later though
We have more points per game without Kane than with Kane
That includes all the same shit opposition
We have more points per game without Kane than with Kane
That includes all the same shit opposition
Ok, we have more PPG, how were we from an attacking perspective?
Without Kane this season we played City, Wolves, Paco and Vitesse. We won the first two but scored a grand total of one goal from open play, so hardly indicative of a thriving attacking force, more that we played defensive football and got lucky via a penalty and a punt. We lost to Paco and Vitesse without him, so again .. not really thriving were we? I mean christ we were even struggling vs Mura till we substituted him on.
Last season we lost Kane for a brief period too, after he got injured vs Liverpool. We lost to Brighton and Chelsea 1-0 each. So in the last 4 league games without Kane we've scored one single open play goal. Wow we're so much better! Freed from the shackles of Harry Kane!
During the period you just lauded the manager and team as being far superior we lost two semis and a finalBack when? Are you suggesting that us losing in the 2017 FA Cup final against Conte's Chelsea was down to Kane only scoring 1 goal?
How can I twist “who cares”?No, what you care about is whatever you can twist to try and save face on this thread.
Yes it does
No you didn't. If Kane is not improving his form how come he just scored against Liverpool and set up what could have been a match-winning assist?
No I’m comparing the fact that just because you did something 4 days ago it doesn’t make it a normsee how you're comparing Berg to someone who has scored 176 goals across 7 seasons.
So coming on late means you can’t play well?You mean: they didn't come on until late in the game. Nice try![]()
Then you should be happy we have a coach now who wants to get the whole team firing again, like we used to under Poch.
And yet you still can't provide any evidence for that other than pointing to the issues causes by poor coaching, whereas I can point to him scoring and assisting more than anyone else in the league last season and scoring more international goals in 2021 than any player in the history of our national team.
My argument is that while he's been in crap form for Tottenham this season, he's clearly still a top class striker. Yours is a dead end of cherry-picked stats which can easily be used against it.
Salah might say go fuck yourself, so possibly would KdB and a whole host of other attacking players who are not "natural forwards" ... you don't half talk some shit ... but at least it gives us all a good laugh ....Sure we can try to go with players that are not natural forwards, I was just pointing out the reason that Kane is overplayed because we have mismanaged our squad meaning we have zero natural replacements for him so have to resort to playing guys out of position to cover for him.
Since 2016 we have more ppg without Kane than with himOk, we have more PPG, how were we from an attacking perspective?
I have faith in Conte but I think Winks is shitYou moaned about numerous choices he made, including keeping Kane on. He's only been here five minutes and you're already questioning basic decisions he makes, but you think he's the best? Surely you have faith he knows what he is doing?
You moaned about numerous choices he made, including keeping Kane on. He's only been here five minutes and you're already questioning basic decisions he makes, but you think he's the best? Surely you have faith he knows what he is doing?
It’s not funny at all, it’s cost us silverware and got them sackedIt's funny how all these professional football coaches are always getting it so wrong
How come you've never coached a premier league club? Sounds like you're a visionary...
"Conte is a genius, except for when he rates players I've been whining about for months!"
Salah might say go fuck yourself, so possibly would KdB and a whole host of other attacking players who are not "natural forwards" ... you don't half talk some shit ... but at least it gives us all a good laugh ....
Sonny, who is also not a "natural forward" might add please stop talking bollocks .... yes we need another striker but the issue (football issue so way over your head) is that with the exception of Sonny our midfield players have consistently failed to score enough goals.
Again as this is football knowledge you won't understand but look at Pep's City - they play with a single striker but score 60% of their goals from midfield - Klopp's Liverpool play with midfielders Salah and Mane, neither of whom are "natural strikers" scoring 60% of their goals.
You won't understand but whilst Kane is a world class striker, and Son is a world class attacking midfielder, after that we struggle for goals ... adding a striker to alternate with Kane won't make Kane or Spurs score more, but adding a goal scoring midfield player (or getting Dele back to where he was) will ... I know that's football tactics, which you don't understand, but Pep, Klopp and Conte all do, luckily Conte's now in charge, you should already be able to see the tactical differences ... but then it's you so maybe not.
Since 2016 we more ppg without Kane than with him
Deal with it however you want
Ok, we have more PPG, how were we from an attacking perspective?
Well we won more games 1-0 and drew some 1-1 than we had previously lost 0-1 and 1-2 ..... so from an attacking perspective we scored less .... of course we won/drew rather than lost (that's why the PPG is higher) but who cares about winning right?
Since 2016 we have just as many points per game with or without Kane, that's not to say we don't need Kane we do, but it's a team game and the team have stepped up more often that not.