• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

We could have taken him off and left Bergwin on instead , who had scored and was played generally well anyway. Theres just no need to overplay Kane who already runs like hes knackered from the start of games.

Sure we can try to go with players that are not natural forwards, I was just pointing out the reason that Kane is overplayed because we have mismanaged our squad meaning we have zero natural replacements for him so have to resort to playing guys out of position to cover for him.
 
But the poor team, manager and tactics is why Kane was losing finals and semis back then too?

Back when? Are you suggesting that us losing in the 2017 FA Cup semi final against Conte's Chelsea was down to Kane only scoring 1 goal?

Did you shit the bed?

Detriment? No, we ended with Antonio Conte

No, we ended with Jose, who then steered us back out of the Top 6. We then tried Nuno, after Conte turned us down while we were still unsure if we would keep Harry Kane.

We lucked into Conte because he was still available and we still had one of the best strikers in world football for him to world with.

No you don’t care about the clubs record without this player. I do

No, what you care about is whatever you can twist to try and save face on this thread.


It's just throwing your self-serving bullshit back in your face, mate. No-one gives two shits whether you think you are more of a fan than anyone else. If anything, your behavior here signals that you care more about your position on TFC than you do Tottenham Hotspur.

Difference between turning up against West Brom in the league and Utd in a semi final

Yeah. One has markedly better players trying to stop you scoring.


No it doesn't. 😁 if Kane is the driver, what is his car? The team? You seem to have a completely backwards understanding of how football works as a team sport.

The coach is the driver, or else you are just shitting the bed.

Yes I just answered that

No you didn't. If Kane is not improving his form how come he just scored against Liverpool and set up what could have been a match-winning assist?

Bergwijn doesn’t play well or score often despite doing that last night. See how it works.

I see how you're comparing Berg to someone who has scored 176 goals across 7 seasons.

Yeah, and then West Ham came and they were nowhere.

You mean: they didn't come on until late in the game. Nice try 🙄

And they were sacked

Then you should be happy we have a coach now who wants to get the whole team firing again, like we used to under Poch.

No I said he was declining, I didn’t say he wouldnt score against crap

And yet you still can't provide any evidence for that other than pointing to the issues causes by poor coaching, whereas I can point to him scoring and assisting more than anyone else in the league last season and scoring more international goals in 2021 than any player in the history of our national team.

My argument is that while he's been in crap form for Tottenham this season, he's clearly still a top class striker. Yours is a dead end of cherry-picked stats which can easily be used against it.
 
Last edited:
Yeah you seem to have zero comprehension of regression

You seem to think anyone should give two shits about the waffle of someone who thinks that just because you're not playing One Man Team tactics this makes the man in question useless to your team. Don't forget you're just some bloke on the internet with a very regressive understanding of football.

Poch regressed unless you think 26oys from 25 games and not winning a league game in the road is a reason to keep him

Poch was broken after the CL final, and couldn't find his spark again. He had worked miracles with an exhausted squad and ran out of juice. He was still the best man to steer the rest of that season if you ask me, and maybe hand things over at the end of it.

Sacking him mid-season is exactly the type of short-term nonsense which plagues most Premier League clubs now, and has been Levy's habitual mistake. Every time we've knee-jerked the way you like, we've thrown our squad and ambitions into turmoil. We got lucky that Conte was willing to come to us and save us from Nuno, but Poch wasn't Nuno. Poch was who had given us our whole team identity, and handing that to Jose was a complete disaster.

My sentiment is towards the club, you’re still crying years later though

No, your sentiment is to your own voice, and your own ego. My sentiment is to the club, which is why I want voices like yours to shut up for a while and stop making us like Woolwich.
 
We have more points per game without Kane than with Kane

That includes all the same shit opposition

Ok, we have more PPG, how were we from an attacking perspective?

Without Kane this season we played City, Wolves, Paco and Vitesse. We won the first two but scored a grand total of one goal from open play, so hardly indicative of a thriving attacking force, more that we played defensive football and got lucky via a penalty and a punt. We lost to Paco and Vitesse without him, so again .. not really thriving were we? I mean christ we were even struggling vs Mura till we substituted him on.

Last season we lost Kane for a brief period too, after he got injured vs Liverpool. We lost to Brighton and Chelsea 1-0 each. So in the last 4 league games without Kane we've scored one single open play goal. Wow we're so much better! Freed from the shackles of Harry Kane!
 
Ok, we have more PPG, how were we from an attacking perspective?

Without Kane this season we played City, Wolves, Paco and Vitesse. We won the first two but scored a grand total of one goal from open play, so hardly indicative of a thriving attacking force, more that we played defensive football and got lucky via a penalty and a punt. We lost to Paco and Vitesse without him, so again .. not really thriving were we? I mean christ we were even struggling vs Mura till we substituted him on.

Last season we lost Kane for a brief period too, after he got injured vs Liverpool. We lost to Brighton and Chelsea 1-0 each. So in the last 4 league games without Kane we've scored one single open play goal. Wow we're so much better! Freed from the shackles of Harry Kane!

You may take our ability to score, but you can't take our freedom!

(just wait and watch him go ahead and blame it on Nuno... 😆)
 
Back when? Are you suggesting that us losing in the 2017 FA Cup final against Conte's Chelsea was down to Kane only scoring 1 goal?
During the period you just lauded the manager and team as being far superior we lost two semis and a final

You claimed we lost these games due to poor tactics earlier

No, we ended with Jose

Contes the manager last time I checked

No, what you care about is whatever you can twist to try and save face on this thread.
How can I twist “who cares”?

Yes it does

No you didn't. If Kane is not improving his form how come he just scored against Liverpool and set up what could have been a match-winning assist?

He had one goal and one assist under Nuno

Now he has one goal and no assists since Conte

That’s not improving

see how you're comparing Berg to someone who has scored 176 goals across 7 seasons.
No I’m comparing the fact that just because you did something 4 days ago it doesn’t make it a norm

You mean: they didn't come on until late in the game. Nice try 🙄
So coming on late means you can’t play well?
As I said, poor subs

Then you should be happy we have a coach now who wants to get the whole team firing again, like we used to under Poch.

I am, and I’ll be happy when he starts to build his own team as opposed to being forced to recycle the shite that Poch Jose and Nuno built
And yet you still can't provide any evidence for that

And yet you still can't provide any evidence for that other than pointing to the issues causes by poor coaching, whereas I can point to him scoring and assisting more than anyone else in the league last season and scoring more international goals in 2021 than any player in the history of our national team.

My argument is that while he's been in crap form for Tottenham this season, he's clearly still a top class striker. Yours is a dead end of cherry-picked stats which can easily be used against it.

So what you are saying is that Kane was better under Jose and Mason than under Conte?

I agree, that’s why Conte will replace him
 
Sure we can try to go with players that are not natural forwards, I was just pointing out the reason that Kane is overplayed because we have mismanaged our squad meaning we have zero natural replacements for him so have to resort to playing guys out of position to cover for him.
Salah might say go fuck yourself, so possibly would KdB and a whole host of other attacking players who are not "natural forwards" ... you don't half talk some shit ... but at least it gives us all a good laugh ....

Sonny, who is also not a "natural forward" might add please stop talking bollocks .... yes we need another striker but the issue (football issue so way over your head) is that with the exception of Sonny our midfield players have consistently failed to score enough goals.

Again as this is football knowledge you won't understand but look at Pep's City - they play with a single striker but score 60% of their goals from midfield - Klopp's Liverpool play with midfielders Salah and Mane, neither of whom are "natural strikers" scoring 60% of their goals.

You won't understand but whilst Kane is a world class striker, and Son is a world class attacking midfielder, after that we struggle for goals ... adding a striker to alternate with Kane won't make Kane or Spurs score more, but adding a goal scoring midfield player (or getting Dele back to where he was) will ... I know that's football tactics, which you don't understand, but Pep, Klopp and Conte all do, luckily Conte's now in charge, you should already be able to see the tactical differences ... but then it's you so maybe not.
 
It's funny how all these professional football coaches are always getting it so wrong
It’s not funny at all, it’s cost us silverware and got them sacked

How come you've never coached a premier league club? Sounds like you're a visionary...

Amazing considering you blamed managers for their tactics in Kane losing 4 finals and 3 semis in 6 years.

Maybe you’d have won the lot?
 
Salah might say go fuck yourself, so possibly would KdB and a whole host of other attacking players who are not "natural forwards" ... you don't half talk some shit ... but at least it gives us all a good laugh ....

Sonny, who is also not a "natural forward" might add please stop talking bollocks .... yes we need another striker but the issue (football issue so way over your head) is that with the exception of Sonny our midfield players have consistently failed to score enough goals.

Again as this is football knowledge you won't understand but look at Pep's City - they play with a single striker but score 60% of their goals from midfield - Klopp's Liverpool play with midfielders Salah and Mane, neither of whom are "natural strikers" scoring 60% of their goals.

You won't understand but whilst Kane is a world class striker, and Son is a world class attacking midfielder, after that we struggle for goals ... adding a striker to alternate with Kane won't make Kane or Spurs score more, but adding a goal scoring midfield player (or getting Dele back to where he was) will ... I know that's football tactics, which you don't understand, but Pep, Klopp and Conte all do, luckily Conte's now in charge, you should already be able to see the tactical differences ... but then it's you so maybe not.

It is great that other teams with different tactics play different ways. We are not City and Liverpool have Firmino, Jota and Origi.

Son can have all the words he wants but he is a starter so he isn't over for Kane. This has been gone over here multiple times and every time it is brought up it is correctly pointed out how stupid it is to claim that Son is cover for Kane.

There is no cover for Kane, your attempts to use personal attacks that are pure crap doesn't change that.
 
Since 2016 we more ppg without Kane than with him

Deal with it however you want

Says the man who thinks anything which happened past this half season is irrelevant. Kane's goal in the past don't matter now because he's been bad so far this season, right? Your logic switches so quickly it's incredible.

Facts say that in RECENT games we've been shit going forward without Kane. One goal from open play in the four games we played without him, struggling vs Europe's shitest sides when he isn't in the team too.

You look only at PPG, why not how many goals we scored without? That would actually show if we're a better attacking team without him. What does Kane have to do with us defensively? I imagine if we look at goals per game with and without, and our xG with and without, it'd be less when we don't have Kane in this team.

And as Datzlo Datzlo says - sample size is important here. With Kane is far more games.
 
Ok, we have more PPG, how were we from an attacking perspective?

Well we won more games 1-0 and drew some 1-1 than we had previously lost 0-1 and 1-2 ..... so from an attacking perspective we scored less .... of course we won/drew rather than lost (that's why the PPG is higher) but who cares about winning right?

Since 2016 we have just as many points per game with or without Kane, that's not to say we don't need Kane we do, but it's a team game and the team have stepped up more often that not.
 
Well we won more games 1-0 and drew some 1-1 than we had previously lost 0-1 and 1-2 ..... so from an attacking perspective we scored less .... of course we won/drew rather than lost (that's why the PPG is higher) but who cares about winning right?

Since 2016 we have just as many points per game with or without Kane, that's not to say we don't need Kane we do, but it's a team game and the team have stepped up more often that not.

Okay, so you've got one sample consisting of hundreds of games, and one with what? 30 odd? And this is a fair comparison in what universe?

The team may have been able to step up under Poch without him, it was a good team with a great work ethic, we may have dug in and won some games 1-0. That doesn't mean we were 'better' without him, just that we were capable of coping. But that's all it was, coping, otherwise the manager wouldn't have rushed him back whenever he could.

Yes, it's a team game. And almost all our managers seem to think we benefit from Kane in the team. More recently when he's been out, we've badly struggled to score goals. Maybe if/when we're back to prime Poch levels and have a great side we can afford to lose him, but we aren't there yet.
 
Back
Top