It was Pogba according to that Paul o keefe guy on twatter
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.
- Thread starter Darnswim 🇦🇱
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
It was Pogba according to that Paul o keefe guy on twatter
Woolwich fans think Partey is better than Bissouma. I wouldn't trust home fans.
Danny Rose
I'm really worried he'd end up at the goons. They are desperate for a striker or two and the fanbase has really turned on the management since Bissouma so they'll need to make a statement to appease them. I reckon they'll go big, £70m+
That's detrimental for Everton under FFP. Richarlison 60m all recorded as profit while cost of incomings is spread across contract
In what world is that loser better than Bissouma
never was they overate their own playersIn what world is that loser better than Bissouma
i remember them saying auba was light years ahead of kane
surely if we get bissouma, we don't need McKennie anymore.
On the richarlison debate, I'm sure we can get Everton down to a more sensible price. He's not setting the world alight but there is real value in someone who is totally proven and consistent in the PL. Look how many strikers West Ham went through that turned out to be flops in the PL (hehehehe)
Are you sure about that? I really don't think that you can just make things up to suit your needs like that (unless you're Man City...)
Like Everton can't just go to Mr FFP "look, look £60m profit for Richarlison, aren't we great, our books are balanced AF!"
Mr FFP - but what about the £75m you've spent on Winks???
Fat Frank - Oh don't worry about that, that's a buy now pay later over the next 30 years, it's fine...
I'm pretty sure you could only record £60m for Richarlison as profit if a) That is a flat fee, not made up of incentives and b) Spurs actually paid it as a lump sum, not instalments. I'm certainly no expert but there's creative book keeping, and then there's fraud.
Deleted member 15314
Guest
He's long outstayed his welcome as a player. He's had his moments, and we'll remember him fondly, but he's fucking dogshit, and we're better off with putting 10m to 15m we'd get for him towards a proper player.
He can't really feel aggreived if Paratici/Conte politely tell him his time's up.
Gonna be pretty gutting seeing eriksen turn out for Man U. There’s been no news of us actually bidding for him yet. Doubt we are even in for him.
He's garbage, but relative to the rest of their midfield he looks a bonafide world beater. The fact that he's so integral to their results is a good indication of just how fucked they are, and long may it continue.In what world is that loser better than Bissouma
As good a place as any! 
The cost of Winks will be amortised across his contract, its the standard and I am sure.
The fee from spurs will be recorded in full where the fee is certain regardless of installments, add ons will be recorded when met. Profit will be the fee spurs paid minus any amortised cost still outstanding (ex 50m over 5 year contract, if he has 2 years left they have to take off 10m)
As good a place as any!
Haha, probably nails how i felt from the final whistle of the champions league final to Conte being appointed better than anything else i've seen.
What I'm asking though is, are you sure or just theorising? I can follow the logic of what you're saying, but surely in terms of FFP at some point you have a black and white money out of the club, money into the club sum that has to be within a certain tolerance? Surely FFP is based on the actual financial books of the club, what money has come in, and what money has gone out over a 12 months period, now what Transfer Fee was disclosed to the media?
Even with the scenario that you outline, in that case then there will be tons of instalments from inward transfers of previous years to take into account? I know that doesn't affect the specific Richarlison scenario that started this tangent off, but on a wider scale, just thinking that payments for transfers in are spread over a number of years doesn't actually help much when you have payments for the likes of Iwobi, Tosun, Doucoure, Allan and whatever other dross they signed over the last 3 years still going out.
Agent Sonny caught tapping up Raphinha & Richarlison
‘Come to spurs Richie’
‘Ok , but I could take your place’
… sonny’s reaction