I agreed ref details being known , in one of my own posts I even said both parties would be in possession of the contract not just Sporting . I then referenced selling house meaning Sporting, i obviously was not as clear as I thoughtYou were responding the following question:
"Poro's camp would have know the details of the contract, are you telling me they kept that quiet?"
And you responded "Yes". I questioned what they would have to gain by dicking about when the player has already agreed terms. It makes no sense. If sporting are now messing about then that's a separate issue.
Last edited: