• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers January 2023 Transfer Thread. The Big One

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Honestly, should someone do a wellness check on Boehly?

I can't be too bothered to look into it, but it feels like they must be breaking every single financial rule at this point. Not that any of the governing bodies actually care about enforcing them.
Apparently what's going on is that UEFA have declared that they will begin enforcing a five year maximum on player contracts (who knew that existed?) after this season, and so this window is the last chance for longer contracts than that which can amortize the fee across longer terms for Financial Fair Play purposes.

What Boehly is doing is still very very stupid, but that seems to be the logic.
 
Meanwhile, our "rivals"

Chelsea prepared to pay Fernandez's €120m release clause​

Chelsea have told Benfica they are prepared to pay Enzo Fernandez's €120m (£105m) release clause.
Chelsea have not given up on trying to sign the midfielder before the transfer window closes on Tuesday.
They have offered players on loan and on permanent deals but Benfica have so far refused to accept anything except the release clause.
Fernandez wants to move to Chelsea and has again told Benfica of his desire to join Graham Potter's side.
Chelsea want to structure the payment in installments as paying in one go has financial fair play and tax implications.



Sorry Spurs. It's been, erm, emotional, for 30 odd years, but if you're not even trying anymore, neither am I
 
Apparently what's going on is that FIFA have declared that they will begin enforcing a five year maximum on player contracts (who knew that existed?) after this season, and so this window is the last chance for longer contracts than that which can amortize the fee across longer terms for Financial Fair Play purposes.

What Boehly is doing is still very very stupid, but that seems to be the logic.
I hope they keep spending - happy if they drop another 200/300M tomorrow

Will just expedite a change in regulations from UEFA. This is utterly ridiculous and the big Euro powerhouses will make sure they intervene and sort FFP which will only help us
 
Meanwhile, our "rivals"

Chelsea prepared to pay Fernandez's €120m release clause​

Chelsea have told Benfica they are prepared to pay Enzo Fernandez's €120m (£105m) release clause.
Chelsea have not given up on trying to sign the midfielder before the transfer window closes on Tuesday.
They have offered players on loan and on permanent deals but Benfica have so far refused to accept anything except the release clause.
Fernandez wants to move to Chelsea and has again told Benfica of his desire to join Graham Potter's side.
Chelsea want to structure the payment in installments as paying in one go has financial fair play and tax implications.



Sorry Spurs. It's been, erm, emotional, for 30 odd years, but if you're not even trying anymore, neither am I
Surely FFP has been violated if they sign this fella
 
Apparently what's going on is that UEFA have declared that they will begin enforcing a five year maximum on player contracts (who knew that existed?) after this season, and so this window is the last chance for longer contracts than that which can amortize the fee across longer terms for Financial Fair Play purposes.

What Boehly is doing is still very very stupid, but that seems to be the logic.
That change won’t impact the spending that much. Would have stopped say 20% of their spending only
 
I hope they keep spending - happy if they drop another 200/300M tomorrow

Will just expedite a change in regulations from UEFA. This is utterly ridiculous and the big Euro powerhouses will make sure they intervene and sort FFP which will only help us
And like, forget FFP for a second.

Not all of these moves will succeed, and Chelsea are going to be stuck with a bunch of players on massive wages over long term contracts that they can't sell and may even have a hard time loaning away.

They're creating a total mess for Graham Potter's inevitable successor.

Boehly is a baseball owner. Baseball players are fungible, interchangeable widgets in a way footballers very much are not.

It's smart when Boehly's Los Angeles Dodgers operate like this (which they do). Chelsea will reap the whirlwind.
 
Surely FFP has been violated if they sign this fella
No.

Because they’re being signed on such long contracts (8 or 9 years), they’re able to divide the value of the deal by the number of years it represents. So this 100 million contract only represents 12 or 13 for the sake of FFP.

It’s the ultimate version of short termism.

However, if he turns up and is an average bag of shit, they’ll have a player sat on their books for a decade or, alternatively, have to sell him at a huge loss, whilst still owing years of money to the original selling side.

It’s so fucking risky.
 
And like, forget FFP for a second.

Not all of these moves will succeed, and Chelsea are going to be stuck with a bunch of players on massive wages over long term contracts that they can't sell and may even have a hard time loaning away.

They're creating a total mess for Graham Potter's inevitable successor.

Boehly is a baseball owner. Baseball players are fungible, interchangeable widgets in a way footballers very much are not.

It's smart when Boehly's Los Angeles Dodgers operate like this (which they do). Chelsea will reap the whirlwind.
Yeah fair point. We have plenty of shit players that earn more than they can elsewhere, therefore we will need to pay them to leave (let alone sell them). They will be in a similar position but perhaps they have 100’s of M’s available annually
 
And like, forget FFP for a second.

Not all of these moves will succeed, and Chelsea are going to be stuck with a bunch of players on massive wages over long term contracts that they can't sell and may even have a hard time loaning away.

They're creating a total mess for Graham Potter's inevitable successor.

Boehly is a baseball owner. Baseball players are fungible, interchangeable widgets in a way footballers very much are not.

It's smart when Boehly's Los Angeles Dodgers operate like this (which they do). Chelsea will reap the whirlwind.
Boehly's business partner is the managing partner at the Dodgers and he found a top quality GM to make the player decisions.
 

Fulham in talks to terminate Onomah's contract​

Fulham are in talks with midfielder Josh Onomah to mutually terminate his contract.
Onomah's contract is up in the summer.
Once the termination is finalised, he will become a free agent and therefore can join another club outside of the transfer window.
Sky Sports News has been told a number of Championship clubs are interested in signing him.


Remember when people thought he was good.
Reminds me of Sessegnon. No doubt loads of ability but don’t have the mentality to succeed at the top level.
 
No.

Because they’re being signed on such long contracts (8 or 9 years), they’re able to divide the value of the deal by the number of years it represents. So this 100 million contract only represents 12 or 13 for the sake of FFP.

It’s the ultimate version of short termism.

However, if he turns up and is an average bag of shit, they’ll have a player sat on their books for a decade or, alternatively, have to sell him at a huge loss, whilst still owing years of money to the original selling side.

It’s so fucking risky.
600M over 8 years or 5 years is still a massive fucking spend up
 
Back
Top