• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Next Manager Poll (poll reset 11/04/23)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Next Manager

  • Rodgers

    Votes: 15 3.6%
  • Potter

    Votes: 25 5.9%
  • Nagelsmann

    Votes: 177 41.9%
  • Kompany

    Votes: 43 10.2%
  • Slot

    Votes: 91 21.6%
  • Postecoglou

    Votes: 74 17.5%
  • De Zerbi

    Votes: 31 7.3%
  • Xabi Alonso

    Votes: 11 2.6%
  • Stellini

    Votes: 4 0.9%
  • Frank

    Votes: 10 2.4%
  • Luis Enrique

    Votes: 21 5.0%
  • Zidane

    Votes: 5 1.2%
  • Glasner

    Votes: 3 0.7%
  • Amorim

    Votes: 10 2.4%
  • Carrick

    Votes: 9 2.1%
  • Gallardo

    Votes: 23 5.5%
  • Schmidt

    Votes: 2 0.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.
thanks for this. I was familiar with his trajectory but the points about man management lend him even more credibility.

it's a difficult one as I think a stronger more experienced manager will (to whatever extent) keep Levy accountable to financing the club's future on the field, i.e. acquisition of players and financing an established and successful (read: trophies) philosophy, whereas a manager like Slot with relative success in a smaller league and a lot of potential doesn't really carry as much weight (and will cost a lot less to hire and remove if necessary :levyeyes:

Should Slot come in, I can see Levy reverting to a Poch-type scenario where you make the best of what you've got with incremental investment rather than the financial backing required to make the squad and club structure (scouting, academy, and so on) competitive at the highest level.
The good thing is, should Levy indeed do that, Slot is already pretty accustomed to that since at Feyenoord there are very limited resources for new recruitment and they sold his entire team from the first year (9/11 new starters). He just kind of runs with it. Hopefully the new guy though, whoever he ends up being does get the necessary backing since the PL is a different beast.
 
Chelsea speaking to Naglesman “we have just spent £600 million on young exciting players ,name your targets and we will get them in the summer however we won’t accept top 4 we need to be competing and winning again” :nare:

Levy speaking to Naglesman “we got world
Class players like Dier who can’t wait to work with you, we are getting a go-kart track at the stadium soon and I can also give you free tickets to Beyoncé in the summer , get us top 4 and I’ll give you £15 million a year” :levywhoa:
Funny, sad and true all at the same time
 
I should add that none of this really matters because at the end of the day, it's about creating the most valuable asset out of the club for maximum value upon sale. Installing top managers is a smokescreen to keep the fans happy and attention on the club.

Again - a sale isn't their business plan. They could have sold us years ago for massive profit. We are almost certainly worth as much as we're ever likely to be worth so now is the time to get out.
Their business model is to maintain as high a value as possible in order to use us to leverage non football based loans for ENIC and Levy, which is where they make the most money.
They will be borrowing money left right and centre and using the clubs assets as a guarantee, invest that money into business and property and sell those on quickly. Simply put, we're too useful to their non football business for them to sell. The odds of them owning another multibillion pound asset is slim, especially given what they've actually put into this asset from their own pockets.

How much did Potter cost Chelsea?

£21mn in compensation to Brighton and 6yrs salary Compo to Potter at £12mn a year (£72 mn) plus the salary already paid....in the region of £105mn to leave them mid-table. Wow.

All the more reason for us to steer clear.
 
Was reported in a strange way…

Seems like they maybe did a sly Bayern and have agreed to pay this season but hoping someone comes in to take him
That is literally what all payoffs are. Chelsea agreed to pay Potter x amount over x years. When he is removed from his duty, they will continue to pay him until such time as he replaces that income with a new one.
It wouldn't make sense at all for any club to be paying a manager 5-6 years wages when the manager is back in work and earning elsewhere. In fact, a wise manager would probably get himself sacked every year or 2 and get 15 years of salary inside 5 years.
 
He's no ones first choice pick. But I do think that we have players that would suit Rodgers.



he's not a 3 at the back coach. But he does like to build up through the wings, which definitely suits our squad.
 
He's no ones first choice pick. But I do think that we have players that would suit Rodgers.



he's not a 3 at the back coach. But he does like to build up through the wings, which definitely suits our squad.

michael GIF
 
Rodgers won’t happen, not a chance

I’m happy with either Nags, Potter or Poch

Nags and Poch speak for themselves

Potter made a mistake going to the racists, they were always going to chew him up and spit him out. If given time to get a project going with us I think he’d be really good

Either 3 are fine by me and a step in the right direction
 
It shows what people actually think will happen - not necessarily what will happen.

Placing money on an outcome is a better barometer than a poll on twitter or some forum IMO.



The odds on it being Rodgers are shortening.
The only caveat I'd add is that the 'next manager' market (for all clubs I mean, not just us) tends to be extremely erratic, with odds shortening ludicrously every time the media picks up a name. Both Mason and Poch have been as low as 2/5 (yes, I do mean 2/5 not 5/2) in the last week or so. JN has also been odds on late last week. The betting companies must make an absolute killing on these manager markets.

That said, of course you are absolutely right, they do provide a better indication than randoms spouting off on the internet. A sort of example of 'put your money where your mouth is' I guess... :)
 
Pep would not fail here if given time and a reasonable level of resources. He is the best manager in football history, anywhere where there is a reasonable team & scope to bring in some players he would be successful. Not City level successful but we would be much, much better. He's a phenomenal coach.

We need to be making wholesale changes. Anything similar to 'Pepball' (kinda hate that phrase but hey ho) would take a long time to implement but would be necessary. We need to get away from this slow, counter-attack heavy, Kane reliant football. It's been a crutch for too long and we need to get over it.
The best manager in football history ?
 
He's no ones first choice pick. But I do think that we have players that would suit Rodgers.



he's not a 3 at the back coach. But he does like to build up through the wings, which definitely suits our squad.


I really don't understand the hate he gets. All of his teams have played very good football. That's a massive tick. He knows the league, he knows players in the league, he'd probably be able to bring Maddison with him who we desperately need IMO.
He's achieved a lot more in his career than Potter AND he's not a chelsea reject.

Rodgers won’t happen, not a chance

I’m happy with either Nags, Potter or Poch

Nags and Poch speak for themselves

Potter made a mistake going to the racists, they were always going to chew him up and spit him out. If given time to get a project going with us I think he’d be really good

Either 3 are fine by me and a step in the right direction
WHY are you happy with Potter?
What has he done?
I'd agree with Nagelsmann and Poch over Rodgers, but there is no logical reason IMO why Potter, who has failed so badly, with so much money spent, being more popular than Rodgers, who had Leicester punching above their weight with very little money.
They are where they belong, they're broke. That's not Rodgers fault.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top