• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Big clubs sidestep FFP for the same reason wealthy people don't pay taxes - their legal teams and accountants are better than those working for the regulatory bodies.

Chelsea's spending, to wit, was enabled by amortizing the costs over successive years. Not difficult to do, and other clubs will be doing the same.

Don't hold your breath on a woolwich fire sale.
Yes, they gave these ridiculously long contracts (8 years!) to amortize a smaller portion of the players' transfer fees, but absent some financial gymnastics or high $$$ sales, it will come back to bite them at some point. Especially if they are not as successful on the pitch as they used to be, which is going to be tougher with more teams now challenging for honors.
 
Reminds me of a Lee Gunner clip I saw last night:

"Don't talk to me about negotiations.... I worked as a sales specialist for 20 years....... I know all about negotiating! A customer approaches you; you ask them what their budget is and then you quote them a price and make the sale.... It's the same when you're the buyer...... You go to the negotiating table; ask the price, pay it and get your man. Simple as that."

Absolute business genius! :dawsonlol:

That's precisely why he was a sales specialist for 20 years.
 
I don't buy Richarlison as an FFP induced sale, really. Supposedly they've reported nearly £400M in losses over 3 seasons, almost 3X the allowable amount under FFP. Their transfer business last summer resulted in £20M income...hardly even remotely close to an act to create even the appearance of an effort to comply.

Anyway, like I said, we'll see what comes of any of this. My hypothesis: fuck all.
Everton had a very rich owner running up that 400m and couldn't do any more because of ffp not because they didn't have cash (skint now as the Russian sanctions). By all reports Richarlison was an FFP sale.

It has had an effect, even if it's just the increasingly stupid ways to appear compliant.
 
I think the question it's fair to ask is who is making this decision? Who is assessing the relative merits of these players?

Obviously we have a scouting and recruitment staff who can compile the relevant information, but at the level of executive decision making is this just Levy? Does Ange have any input? Is Scott Munn involved? Has Paratici been consulted?

This is a strategic player recruitment decision, and that remit is a chair that currently sits empty. Where does accountability lie?

I said as much as in the DOF thread, but I think things are playing out roughly as follows:

1. Paratici ongoing list complied since last summer by Fab & his crew.... Some general that we've had our eye on for a while (a la Maddison, CBs); some Conte types, some young bubblers similar to Sarr, Udogie etc; (Tosin, the Turkish lad, Scott) and def. some GKs.
2. The ghost of Fab or one of his crew crossed off all the Conte types when he stropped-off; creating a shorter list.... Combined with whoever the scouting team continued to churn up since.
3. Enter Levy, Ange and maybe then Munn somewhere in the deal-making phase....

He may be on a beach somewhere, but you can bet your ass Ange is watching a shit load of player vids (both current players and possible new recruits) as he sips his cocktails.
 
Last edited:
Do zombie players have rights?

I'm thinking we should pump all our transfer funds into the best necromancer we can find and just resurrect the best players of the past 50 years to be our squad.

If they didn't want to play for us in life, they'll play for free in death.

Just gotta see how Levy feels about white body paint and renaming the club to Quan-Chi FC.

You know what? Fuck him. I'll do it myself. Somebody get Ed Boon on the phone.
 
I think the question it's fair to ask is who is making this decision? Who is assessing the relative merits of these players?

Obviously we have a scouting and recruitment staff who can compile the relevant information, but at the level of executive decision making is this just Levy? Does Ange have any input? Is Scott Munn involved? Has Paratici been consulted?

This is a strategic player recruitment decision, and that remit is a chair that currently sits empty. Where does accountability lie?
The whole DoF question seems to have passed people by.

If I was a betting man, I’d wager that we’re still working off Paratici’s notes.
 
Yes, they gave these ridiculously long contracts (8 years!) to amortize a smaller portion of the players' transfer fees, but absent some financial gymnastics or high $$$ sales, it will come back to bite them at some point. Especially if they are not as successful on the pitch as they used to be, which is going to be tougher with more teams now challenging for honors.

.......Haven't UEFA closed that loophole effective this summer, no?
 
Absolutely.

Scott one is a tough one. Could see him being like Spence and being straight out on loan. Personally would prefer he played but still.

Guler is a similar deal but he's already playing seniors for Turkey.
Get him , keep him and give him minutes. He looks like a proper spurs player just they type to get people excited. Reminds me of gazza they way he goes past players with deceptive pace.
 
Back
Top