• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
To be fair, he could end up being Gollini mk II.

:ange-hands-head:

I don't think he will, for reference, but it's definitely something we'll be anxious to see work out.

New keepers are always a bit of a nail-biter........ We've just been spared the worry for a decade.


Rest assured though...... Upon his first error (which is inevitable sooner or later) there will be uproar from a painfully predictable corner of the 'room'.
 
What a ridiculous comment.

In practice, no other club that operates at his playing level is going to improve his wages so no, he isn’t for sale.
You on about?? Everything has a price whether it’s being marketed or not

Don’t tell me if some fool offered thfc 30 million great British pounds for the contract of Eric dier we wouldn’t sell him

It’s not ridiculous it’s a well trotted trope ‘everything has a price’ …. That includes Eric dier

The telling fact and the point I’m making is no one has offered
 
You on about?? Everything has a price whether it’s being marketed or not

Don’t tell me if some fool offered thfc 30 million great British pounds for the contract of Eric dier we wouldn’t sell him

It’s not ridiculous it’s a well trotted trope ‘everything has a price’ …. That includes Eric dier
Do you not have the foggiest idea how a contract works?

Dier isn’t a slave or an indentured servant. You don’t sell-on a contract. You get a fee to basically tear the current one up and stand aside to let the player agree to a new one with a different employer. His current contract is bilaterally binding. One side can’t terminate it without the other’s permission unless there is explicit language in it that allows it.
 
So pay him the wages he'd earn for the 2023/24 season anyway and spend more money on a backup that likely won't get used given our lighter fixture schedule?

:ange-confused:

I'm not a fan of Dier playing a single more minute for us, but as long as him sticking around doesn't stop the acquisition of two more CBs this summer (which I don't think it will), it's a problem that will take care of itself in a year.
Yes. Negotiate a partial settlement if needed but get him gone. Takes more than he gives, better for all parties if he’s gone. Has nothing to offer
 
Do you not have the foggiest idea how a contract works?

Dier isn’t a slave or an indentured servant. You don’t sell-on a contract. You get a fee to basically tear the current one up and stand aside to let the player agree to a new one with a different employer. His current contract is bilaterally binding. One side can’t terminate it without the other’s permission unless there is explicit language in it that allows it.
Agree but he would jump at the chance at a 30M transfer anywhere *

* Saudi is an exception
 
What kind of fee could we get for Lloris then? 5-10M? Considering the talk was pay off his contract this could a nice little bonus cash drop
 
Yeah, I have too, though it was an owner rather than the CEO.

But I've also worked for directors and Area managers that did the same. It doesn't necessarily HAVE to be the CEO that inspires, he just has to create the structure that includes inspiring people.

I know nothing of Munn really, but he might have that in him? We definitely have it in our manager. Maybe that's enough? Did Man Utd have an inspiring CEO when Ferguson was there? Maybe, but they certainly didn't when the Glazer's took over. The manager was the inspiration there, as was Wenger when he arrived. HE changed the culture at the filth, not their CEO. The CEO just gave him the platform.

Whilst it would be nice to have an inspirational CEO, it's not a must.
Poch did too for a while.

Nice to employ similarly positive ‘area managers’ through the org. We have 1000 staff now, probably x5 as many as when they bought us
 
Back
Top