• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Why wouldn't you play Son as a number 9
Broadly I’m with you in pushing Sonny up top, but I think you’re making it look a little too cut and dry. There are a couple of concerns…..

1) Son looked atrocious last season. Let’s hope that’s just the injury but it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that he’s just not as good anymore.

2) Whilst we were excellent against West Ham, we do need to remember is was a very weak West Ham side and a friendly. I’m sure we all agree that we won’t have that level of dominance in all / most of our games next season. When we’re playing against an aggressive team with a high press, having Son up there who has poor hold up play and doesn’t like playing with his back to goal is far from ideal. We’re nowhere near a complete footballing side that can avoid requiring a long ball outlet yet.

It’s definitely something I think we should explore, but I don’t think it’s a certainty that it pans out perfectly by any means.

Personally, I’d love Toney regardless of the ban. He seems to have a pretty good all round game to me and allows you to play in a multitude of ways.
 
Broadly I’m with you in pushing Sonny up top, but I think you’re making it look a little too cut and dry. There are a couple of concerns…..

1) Son looked atrocious last season. Let’s hope that’s just the injury but it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that he’s just not as good anymore.

Everyone looked atrocious though. So that's no barometer.

2) Whilst we were excellent against West Ham, we do need to remember is was a very weak West Ham side and a friendly. I’m sure we all agree that we won’t have that level of dominance in all / most of our games next season. When we’re playing against an aggressive team with a high press, having Son up there who has poor hold up play and doesn’t like playing with his back to goal is far from ideal. We’re nowhere near a complete footballing side that can avoid requiring a long ball outlet yet.

It's not about the dominance. It's about Anges set up at every club he's been at. He doesn't have lumbering forwards dropping deep.

He has strikers who tend to play on the last line of defence, making runs in behind using supreme movement.

Weak West Ham team or not, to have 70% possession and 30 shots is a good sign that we'll be creating chances this season.

We simply need someone who can get on the end of them but be mobile enough to actually run and score them.

It’s definitely something I think we should explore, but I don’t think it’s a certainty that it pans out perfectly by any means.

If we sell Kane the it's the only option we should explore for the next 12 months. There's simply no realistically affordable striker out there who guarantees us anything.

There's a few promising ones, however they've either been around for one year or just had one good season and the sample size is too small to warrant a gamble when there are bigger glaring issues in the team.

Personally, I’d love Toney regardless of the ban. He seems to have a pretty good all round game to me and allows you to play in a multitude of ways.

I don't mind Toney.
 
Feels like we are Probably just going to evaluate the squad right now and only make more first team signings once we know who is definitely not onboard and who isn't good enough when we get back to London. Only then will we push to make more signings .
 
Back
Top