• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Agree but we are where we are. It seems we are broke and can only buy once Kane goes.

hungry oliver twist GIF
I didn’t realise we are that broke. If big Harry wants to go let him and get this saga over and done with so we can buy players. I see we are linked with Maguire again we don’t need two Dire/Diers on the team. Milk turns quicker than waiting on Levy!
 
We didn't get formal approval of the final stadium until end of Feb 2016.


As of 14th Feb 2016 we were 2 pts off 1st behind Leicester. We finished 3rd end of that season and was on an obvious upward and exciting trajectory.


Despite this, we proceeded with plans to initiate the dismantling of the North East corner of White Hart Lane in the summer of 2016. But we went on to reach 2nd and a semi final of the fa cup the next season (2016/2017). That year, we acquired wanyama, nkoudou, janssen and sissoko. I can't recall who the alternative to sissoko was but I remember sissoko being a disappointing, somewhat desperate purchase after we failed to get our preferred target. (Can anyone remind me?)

So no. I'm not abusing timelines here.

Aside from the fact that we'd already committed a significant amounts of dosh to the project by then (dosh that your scenario would have required us to spend on players); you're talking about putting everything on ice (which itself would have inevitably cost more money) on the basis of what from all perspectives looked like a freak season..... Lester fairytale and everyone else playing like shit

If the final go ahead hadn't been reached until summer 17; after a far more credible title challenge, then you night be onto something but by then we'd already ripped down one of the ends of the stadium and packed our bags for Wembley.

The decision making power has always been in our hands.

Of course; but does one remain committed to the long-term project or indulge in an off the cuff game of roulette? ....That was the decision at play.

I know what a fan with no culpability would choose. I also believe I know what the vast majority of business men with 1bn on the line would choose too.
 
Last edited:
Isco maybe? As I've mentioned before, he's from Benalmádena, where my in-laws have a place. I had this fantasy of meeting him on the seafront, going for a beer and becoming best buddies.

I was coming back from there on deadline day, resigned to our failure to get Isco and waving farewell to my dream of a great new friendship, when the Sissoko news broke. Underwhelmed doesn't start to describe it.

Oh sweet Isco.... One still dreams of this underwhelming, yet mythically proportioned prince. :harrysmile:
 
So, in theory, we should basically never bother comparing anything cos - without a true-zero starting point - it's always gonna be skewed and fucked up by something or another.....???
All comparators are flawed to an extent, but choosing 2019 exacerbates the flaw of this measure as the gap in net spend was so stark in the period before it.

You did make some fair points re stadium costs and the adjustments for that. 👍
 
Not as ridiculous as Spurs fans OVERPLAYING Scum things to make Spurs look worse!

Back at my computer now... Some FACTS:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

CURRENT WINDOW (as at NOW per TFM):

Arse (m/euros):

23/24 in 231.6 out 19.9 <<< so far = 211.7m
Spurs (m/euros):

23/24 in 136.3 out 11.6 <<< so far = 124.7m
Let's do Livepool for posterity too seeing as they occupy a similar bracket to us and the scum:
23/24 in 112 out 14 <<< so far = 98m

..........Lets see how the rest of the window pans out shall we? ...Fair?


--------------------------------------------------------------------

PREVIOUS WINDOWS (since first full season in NWHL):

Arse (m/euros):

22/23 in 192.3 out 23.8 = 168.5m
21/22 in 167.40 out 31.4 = 136.0m
20/21 in 86 out 19.1 = 66.9m
19/20 in 160.8 out 53.6 = 107.2m
= €478.6m (net spend) / Avg per season = €119.65m

Spurs (m/euros):

22/23 in 177.9 out 38.7 = 139.2m
21/22 in 95.9 out 34.6 = 61.3m
20/21 in 110.50 out 13.3 = 97.2m
19/20 in 150.5 out 64.5 = 86m
= €383.7m (net spend) / Avg per season = €95.92m (Hardly the chasm it has been portrayed to be!)

Liverpool (m/euros):
22/23 in 137.3 out 80.7 = 56.6m
21/22 in 87.0 out 29.5 = 57.5m
20/21 in 84.0 out 17.2 = 66.8m
19/20 in 10.4 out 48.0 = -37.6m
= €143.3m (net spend) / Avg per season = €35.82m

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Wages in pounds (Seeing as goalposts get shifted to wages if/when it suits):

22/23 - Arse 103.5m / THFC 110.4m
21/22 - Arse 93.9m / THFC 89.7m
20/21 - Arse 128.7m / THFC 129.1m
19/20 - Arse 115.4m / THFC 93.1m

Arse = Total £441.5m
THFC = Total £422.3m
Diff = £19.2m / Avg per season = £4.8m

Figures as per:

........Contrary to hype; Arse aren't vastly outspending us there either

--------------------------------------------------------------------

This isn't intended to provoke further debate; but:

To Dare Is To Do. To Dare Is To Do.
Richard Arlison Richard Arlison
ElTel

Please bookmark for future discussion.. It would save a lot of ball-ache.
in the last 5 years

our net spend = 508m
Woolwich net spend = 690m


in the last 10 years

our net spend = 539m
Woolwich net spend = 969m
 
Back
Top