"To the stars through difficulties"
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
"To the stars through difficulties"
Was it definitely in this thread? Was it a link to an interview, or just something that a poster said they had seen somewhere? I'm interested to see what Pep said / looked like, and am happy to trawl through the last x pages of this thread to find it if it's there, but I dont' want to waste my time if it isn't...
We make him the main man and then he wants to play for someone else.
Winning definitely doesn't happen when you bench a world class player in place of Richarlison. If Kane stays, it's in the best interest of the club to utilise his talent, not try to prove a point with a silly moral crusade.
This.
No; whilst he's under contract.
He's already the main man...... You make it sound like we'd be 'promoting' him..... So long as he gives 100% then there'd be nothing untoward going on.
There's a untold angles at play here.....
- We could have refused the money and we'd still be in this final year/leave for free predicament.
- BM could have bailed out and we'd still be in this final year/leave for free predicament.
.........They'd still be sat back watching the same outcome, regardless.
- How do you think they'd feel seeing us chuck him in the with the kids do to boardroom politics?
- How'd you think Ange would feel being told he can't play a world class striker even though we'd already missed out on a fee to replace him?
Nothing's really changed here...... Same three outcomes in the offing... Senseless getting spiteful as they draw closer.
If Kane stays I can’t wait for his first poor game. There will be a total and utter meltdown on here![]()
Ok, wake us up when this is decided.
Whatever happens, fuck it we are smashing teams to pieces this year. Kane or no Kane.
Was it definitely in this thread? Was it a link to an interview, or just something that a poster said they had seen somewhere? I'm interested to see what Pep said / looked like, and am happy to trawl through the last x pages of this thread to find it if it's there, but I dont' want to waste my time if it isn't...
Not a silly moral crusade, it's building a team.
Good teams make players look better all the time.
Committed Kane makes the team better no question.
Playing him when he's not committed makes other players in the team worse, even if he's still able to play well.
I want us to sign a CB better than both Dier and Sanchez.Unless we get a decent fee, I’d honestly rather keep Sanchez than risk having to play dier in an emergency.
I keep reading this nonsense - Levy kepy him 2 years ago when he pretty much went on strike for a few weeks, if that isn't 'not committed' then I don't know what is. Yet once it was 'temporarily over' he knuckled down like a pro, and has continued to be superb for us in many games since. The idea that either Levy would deliberately ruin next season by insisting his best player is benched, or Kane would ruin next season by not giving everything, is just ludicrous and has already been proven as such 2 years ago.if its just small financial things this will get sorted quick, levy wont want to keep him if he is not committed
Think it was a spursweb link off twitter in here or Kane thread mate.