• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10

Results are only viewable after voting.
kingdawson said:
I'm sure you understand what I'm saying but like a few others you overuse 'humour' in order to get out of your stupid reasoning.

I'll dumb it down and use bullet points to show how incredibly stupid your argument was.

* You state Bonucci would have been a good signing.

* youre challenged on that bizarre statement as its clear Bonucci doesn't have pace and can't play a high line.

* you state that's fine because he would be a back up.

*you're challenged on that statement and asked what would happen if one of our other cb's are injured.

* you state we would have another cb (the 3rd option) ahead of him (quite frankly a quite bizarre response).



in the meantime you're responding to another post in which you state we are signing a player because "Kulusevski doesn't have the pace required to play his role".

I mean does it have to be spelt out to you? like maybe it's not a great idea signing players (BONUCCI) who do not have the necessary attributes required to play Anges system regardless if they are starters or being signed as back up players (BONUCCI).
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

1. Yes
2. Fine to challenge, if at any point I'd suggested he'd be a starting CB. At 36, I'm not sure he'd be expecting it either
3. It's not a bizarre response to think that one of our other 2-3 centre-backs would start ahead of him, while he would be a good option off the bench. Thinking he'd be a good addition to the squad does not mean I don't think we don't need another CB, but I definitely think he'd help improve what we've got with advice and playing time in training

He's £3m and playing for Union I doubt he'd be on huge wages. Hey, Union are going through a great period in their history and maybe he just wants to be part of that. Who knows?

Funnily enough, they're talking about the move on Talksport now (H&J at around 14:02) and saying what great experience he'd bring to the club and how he might not be a starter because their starting backline is pretty good.

Maybe you can phone into Talksport and call their correspondent a moron?
 
Like I said, you know I'm almost Spurs, you know I'm almost a Yid
And when the drummer drums, he's gonna to play my song to carry the crowd along
Like I said, you know I'm almost Spurs, you know I'm almost a Yid
When the taxi comes to ferry me away to N17 where we all belong

Brennan's Death Song.
 
Raumdeuterz said:
Bored Married With Children GIF
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Does he start for us? I have no idea
 
GGTH said:
Vicario and VDV were also supposed to be average, people really only warmed up to them after seeing them play in this system, maybe the same will happen for Johnson and Gallagher.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

If anything, it shows our fanbase haven't really got a clue.

Just base an opinion of a Spurs player by what he does in a Spurs shirt. It's alot easier. As I said before, most Spurs fans didn't even realise Maddison could dribble with the ball ffs
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top