Using the Kane money to buy Johnson, Gallagher and maybe Kelly/Tosin is peak Spurs tbh. All average as
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Each in their last year? negotiate a release in order to free up spots. All very simple when you accept reality. We will do this in January as we always do.How can you blame Levy for Dav and Dier when, by all accounts he’s had deals for them to leave and they rejected the move?
He needs to be a star to justify that valuation, but he's talented, growth is possible there, let's live in hope.Brennan seem a very good signing squad wise. We only have Kulu to play that position and he's not the perfect fit for the system. Also with Brennan to play RW we can use Kulu as AM if needed.
I'm sure you understand what I'm saying but like a few others you overuse 'humour' in order to get out of your stupid reasoning.
I'll dumb it down and use bullet points to show how incredibly stupid your argument was.
* You state Bonucci would have been a good signing.
* youre challenged on that bizarre statement as its clear Bonucci doesn't have pace and can't play a high line.
* you state that's fine because he would be a back up.
*you're challenged on that statement and asked what would happen if one of our other cb's are injured.
* you state we would have another cb (the 3rd option) ahead of him (quite frankly a quite bizarre response).
in the meantime you're responding to another post in which you state we are signing a player because "Kulusevski doesn't have the pace required to play his role".
I mean does it have to be spelt out to you? like maybe it's not a great idea signing players (BONUCCI) who do not have the necessary attributes required to play Anges system regardless if they are starters or being signed as back up players (BONUCCI).
Using the Kane money to buy Johnson, Gallagher and maybe Kelly/Tosin is peak Spurs tbh. All average as
I'd much rather spunk 70m on a genuine class classplayer who has many years left and have a bit of change. than replacing squad players with squad players.Using the Kane money to buy Johnson, Gallagher and maybe Kelly/Tosin is peak Spurs tbh. All average as
Just ignore it:
Vicario and VDV were also supposed to be average, people really only warmed up to them after seeing them play in this system, maybe the same will happen for Johnson and Gallagher.Or the Kane money was used to buy Maddison, Vicario and Van de Ven.
Guess it depends what side of the fence you want to lay I guess
Does he start for us? I have no idea
I reckon he'll prove a better option than Kulusevski longer termI'm genuinely trying to be excited about it. He's quick I guess. I like quick, it is fun.
That's about all I've got. Who knows.
Vicario and VDV were also supposed to be average, people really only warmed up to them after seeing them play in this system, maybe the same will happen for Johnson and Gallagher.
Finally an end to Kulusevski’s reign of terror at starting RW with no competition.
I reckon he'll prove a better option than Kulusevski longer term
Realise that's not a very high bar but it's something I guess