We have played 4 of last seasons top half, 3 of which were above us, and 4 bottom half if you count the new promoted teams as bottom half. 5 away and 3 home.
Pretty regular start really.
Pretty regular start really.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
What is this shit?
This is the sort of skewed way of looking at it that I would expect from a gooner.
You could skew it the other way.
* We've played 5 away and only 3 at home.
*We didn't lose at the Emirates which a guaranteed spanking most seasons.
*We beat Liverpool for the first time in what 6 seasons?
* Both Liverpool and Woolwich were bang in form when we played them.
And how exactly is it our problem that Liverpool lose all discipline and get 2 sent off?
There is a long way to go, and there will be more tests ahead but puff your chest out a bit we are top of the league. Enjoy it.
Took Arse 12 attempts to beat City.Doesn't work like that. Play worst team in the league 8 times and it's a good chance you'll lose once and draw once just by the different ways the games unfold.
And even by your logic, there is no teams in this league we shouldn't beat then. Let's go on and smash unconvincing City, worst Chelsea in decades and patchy Newcastle too and just win the league.
I bloody hope so
WillWilliams , here's a new addition to matters...
![]()
or the reddit post
View: https://old.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/173x3oz/optaanalyst_how_difficult_are_each_premier/
So, by the measure of remaining game difficulty our first 10 games have been the easiest...and by some distance as no other team's spread is >/=7 pts from the previous club (Arse to Villa 2nd at 5.8).
Interesting way to measure as it takes out the variability of preseason expectations and utilizes actual season performance to gauge.
............OR one can just respect teams enough in general to deem any succession of good results to be "good form", but sure; ultimately the only form table that matters is the one after 38 games.
Of course in your world bottom can't beat top apparently.
You are making the same mistake so many in here are making...no one said "easy", that absolutism is not the contention. The actual point in question was relative in nature, one clubs early season fixture difficulty RELATIVE to others...which is EASIER or EASIEST in relative difficulty...neither of which needs to actually be EASY.
Yeah, but I'm thinking it's because you tried to engage internet point seeking children in a discussion that could possibly recast their club's early season accomplishments in a harsher but more realistic way. Never gonna go over well even if there is a decent basis for the idea. But I'm glad you did as I'd been thinking similarly...still am.Yeah I saw something like this.
The 5 game version though which had us and Chelsea with the easiest start stat wise.
Our last 10 games look brutal in comparison. See how people talk about them come May.
In meantime it’s better to think I’m just a mental.
Did I say that? Or are you making shit up to suit your agenda?
I have referred to the point the bottom 6 teams have won hardly any games.
5 wins between them. In approx 40 games. They are more likely to lose than win. A fact.
And statistically speaking if you take the historical results of spurs v the teams that finished top 4 in the premier league the previous season and matched them to the teams that were promoted and the one finished that 17th I would 100% expect you would find more points were won against the latter.
I would also expect if you looked on the match threads here the expectation of 3 points and higher winning margins would be higher against the promoted teams.
But feel free to paint it out as just being my crazy opinion.