It's not working yet no but the underlying numbers, the times when it has worked like some of the first 10 games, Newcastle at home, Villa away, both games against City (even if we lost 1)... and the things we are seeing on the actual football pitch this season suggest there is something worth persevering with.
Newcastle at home, Villa away and City away were the absolute outliers in that back end of results. Nobody can rationally say we were not electric in those first ten games. We've been nothing like that in the subsequent 34 games, save a few stand-outs and beating relegation fodder. Whenever we come against a team that tries to actually stop us playing we struggle. Neither Newcastle not Villa tried to stop us and left huge gaps behind. City away Ange did something he's seldom done, he mixed it up and those last 10 minutes against City we were simply unplayable and they couldn't cope. You could argue that at 3-1 down we had nothing to lose but it was incredible and shows we can do it. My point is more that we've seen much less of the first ten games and more of the last 34, regardless of dominance. So my question to YOU directly is was it just a new manager bounce? Because the subsequent games are an indication of declining performance overall, with a PPG tally to match. Having lots of the ball, and failing to convert that to any sort of meaningful result because we have no clue on how to break a low block is not progress. It is exactly what we struggled with last year, just more teams are doing it now. It's on the manager and his coaching staff to learn how to get through that. So again, as evasive as you are to actually address direct questions, how much time do we persevere with it, in your opinion? How long before even you have had enough? How long can you keep doing the same thing, but expect different results?
Why do you want me to have an answer for you about how long to stick by it? We are all different here... You say I tell you that "we are all wrong" as if there is some hive mind that all agree that Ange ball will never work and we need a change. Who is this "we" that you are talking about?
Whilst I can only speak for myself, the collective "we" is a growing number of fans disgruntled with what we are seeing. You are no more wrong than I am - this is a discussion forum where we all have different views and opinions, and there clearly division in the fanbase. I'm just asking you a direct question that you don't want to answer. That's fine, you do you. But it's laughable that you are so dismissive of those that want things to change for the better or are so fed up with the awful run of form and results and you won't even elaborate on where your line is.
I was actually talking to a completely individual person who pays good money to watch games, is frustrated with results but still sees the value in persevering over another manager change. How does that unique view sit within your delusional "we" consensus?
Again, this is a discussion forum where people are going to pick up on things other people say and respond. It's not an echo chamber for people to just exchange their own views. DM that person of WhatsApp them if you want to engage in solely positive discussion. Also I take HUGE exception to the inference about someone paying money going to games. I've been a season ticket holder, life circumstances and watching an entire season of Nuno/Conte was enough to ensure I couldn't justify £1300 for that shit. I go to as many games as I can, I give my time to watch every match and even spend hours of my life wasting engaging here with other fans. Someone going to games gets nothing but my admiration and respect, but it doesn't make them any more of a fan than I am, or worthy or an opinion more. It's not a stakeholder program, it's a consumer product. I could, however, argue that someone paying hundreds of pounds for this and still being happy could be considered more delusional than I.
This cycle of binning managers after 18 months HAS to change, I don't disagree. We do have to be patient, to a degree because we've had to ensure a reset. Not too dissimilar to Poch, really. Poch, like Ange, had to sack off so much shite. And in the end had us challenging to a level we'd not seen in decades, even if we did fall short. I have seen enough in Ange's football to suggest we could get there, but it mostly in that start, and then went backwards. We are stuck at the moment, waiting for it to click. For Maddison - so instrumental in those first games - the produce on that level. For Solanke - so unfortunate to get injured - to click with the system. For us to make the most of that dominance.
On the other hand, having shipped out so much shit, we are still playing most of the players that Ange utilised last year, with him reluctant to swap out his favourites. So again, I simply ask you, who asks all of us "delusional" fans that are fed up, how patient should we be? 5 games? 10 games? The season? I want to be proven wrong, so badly and want this club to succeed. We've suffered for so long, and have been mismanaged, from the board and recruitment more than anything else. This is where the impatience comes from. How much more should we suffer this specific chapter of it, if Ange cannot change the results?