• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
I’ll go with the chart instead of the league position because the league table was so tight at that stage, 1 result was the difference between 10th and 3rd.

Ange has made mistakes but some of those I find difficult to evaluate without all the information to hand. What you are doing in that post is assuming the missing information and taking an emotional position as a result.

You really think we’d be 15th if we didn’t lose half our squad for 2 months?
It was not only about league position. PPG was shit before injury as well as TheSpurEst rightfully mentioned in his post.
 
It was not only about league position. PPG was shit before injury as well as TheSpurEst rightfully mentioned in his post.
Yeah small sample size PPG early in the season isn’t really much to work with for analysis if you want to get much of value. Which is similar to what the OP said,

Do you think we’d be 15th if we didn’t have half our squad out?
 
Didn’t we have Bent and Pavlyuchenko and there was some theory they couldn’t play together. The start of that season was comedic.

He worked it out in the end. We were all banging the same drum with a real chance of doing something special. He wanted to push on and got Nelsen and Sega mega drive man, Bolton player died, he went to court, got touted for the England job, coming to an end like a sparkler from a standard fireworks box (not Pochettino, Harry... however frighteningly similar that sounds lol)
 
Because most fans have no idea who Matty Wells is. They only really know Mason from the coaching staff since he's been interim twice before.
You are spot on , mentioned his name to a couple of supporters in my family and they looked at me blankly.

For those that don't know, Matty is the grandson of Cliff Jones and has more managerial experience than Ryan , he also worked with our youngsters at the same time as Kieran McKenna now with Ipswich.

 
Last edited:
Apart from VdV, they were all playing when we lost at home to Ipswich. There have been some truly terrible results and performances, injuries or not.

Which is why, with extra injuries, Ange's team plays like a relegation candidate. Contrast that with how Iraola has coped with injuries at Bournemouth.

It seems pretty clear at this point that Ange ain't figuring out anything.

So what?

Youre talking about losing a game of football? It happens. Didn't Chelsea just lose 2-0 Ipswich with a team that probably cost twice what ours did?

There is a difference between losing a game of football, and your form falling off the edge of a cliff.

We beat City after the Ipswich loss and were 3 points off 3rd. We were not picking up a worthy amount of points but no one, bar Liverpool was.

Our form before the City game and after the City game could not have a more stark contrast.

I literally said its Anges job to figure out a solution - if he can't then its on him - but that doesnt mean the root cause of the problem doesn't exist?
 
Last edited:
I’ll go with the chart instead of the league position because the league table was so tight at that stage, 1 result was the difference between 10th and 3rd.

Ange has made mistakes but some of those I find difficult to evaluate without all the information to hand. What you are doing in that post is assuming the missing information and taking an emotional position as a result.

You really think we’d be 15th if we didn’t lose half our squad for 2 months?

No.
It is not emotion.

I posted you cold hard facts.
After 11 games. that actually happened this season. We had 16 points from 11 games.
This equals to 1,45 points per game.
If we multiply it with 38, we get to 55 points.
And in past 5 seasons (that actually have happened) this has meant places 8th-11th.

So it is likely we'd be higher than we are now. But not by much.
Because whole calendar year 2024 we finished on 61 points. But you have to factor in - results under current manager have became worse and worse and worse and worse with absolute consistency.

His all time ppg from 60 games - 1,5 ppg. Equivalent to 57 points per season (which would be worst point tally since 2008-2009!)
His last full season worth of games (last 38) - 1,24 ppg 47 points per season.
Our current ongoing season (22 games) - 1,1 ppg ; 41 points per season
His last 1/2 of season (19 games) - 1,05 ppg ; 40 points per season
His last 10 games - 0,5 ppg ; 19 points per season.

EVERY. SINGLE. REAL HARD FACTUAL RESULT shows. We get worse and worse and worse the longer he stays.
These are not made up numbers. This is his actual trajectory as coach for us.
 
Wait, are you saying it was a bad move to sack Ramos for Redknapp and that it was selling Berbatov that was the problem, not Ramos?
Or am I reading it wrong.

Wait, are you saying it wasn't a bad move to sell Keane and Berbatov at the end of the transfer window, replacing them both with Campbell and that had absolutely no affect what so ever? Or am I reading it wrong
 
It was for 8 minutes but we probably should have scored 2 goals in that 8 minute spell. They were turning the ball over in very dangerous positions
because scoring 2 goals in the first 8 mins is so common? this is why i jumped off the ange train early. the things required for his system to work just don't happen very often. it was clear very early that scoring 3 or more goals per match was needed to win and that's just not something that happens in this league. do you really think we're going to score 100 goals per season? with our squad? it's ludicrous
 
Yeah small sample size PPG early in the season isn’t really much to work with for analysis if you want to get much of value. Which is similar to what the OP said,

Do you think we’d be 15th if we didn’t have half our squad out?
PPG sucked whole 2024 year. Not only at the start of 2024/2025.

Maybe we would not be 15th without injuries, but 11th instead - still not good enough.

At the beginning of 2024 it was similar - let him have players back people said, it will be again like it was for the first 10 games of 2023/24. Well, we got our players back and yeah, we still didnt look good apart odd games till end of season.

Just don't see it this time will be different.
 
It was for 8 minutes but we probably should have scored 2 goals in that 8 minute spell. They were turning the ball over in very dangerous positions

Ah good. Thank you.
You say that I am emotional.

Yet you say that in a game where with full time xG of 0,98 "we probably should have scored 2 goals in 8 minute spell".

Of course.
And I am emotional and you are rational :D
I literally burst out laughing at this comment.

So you do believe that we have "deserved" a victory in all NLDs, right? Cause we had possession and all.
And also "deserved" to win both games against Newcastle this season?
So in this "deserved" table we have 6 wins written down. But in real life... you know the one where facts live... we are with 1 draw and 5 defeats. And 1 point to league table from 18 possible.
 
No.
It is not emotion.

I posted you cold hard facts.
After 11 games. that actually happened this season. We had 16 points from 11 games.
This equals to 1,45 points per game.
If we multiply it with 38, we get to 55 points.
And in past 5 seasons (that actually have happened) this has meant places 8th-11th.

So it is likely we'd be higher than we are now. But not by much.
Because whole calendar year 2024 we finished on 61 points. But you have to factor in - results under current manager have became worse and worse and worse and worse with absolute consistency.

His all time ppg from 60 games - 1,5 ppg. Equivalent to 57 points per season (which would be worst point tally since 2008-2009!)
His last full season worth of games (last 38) - 1,24 ppg 47 points per season.
Our current ongoing season (22 games) - 1,1 ppg ; 41 points per season
His last 1/2 of season (19 games) - 1,05 ppg ; 40 points per season
His last 10 games - 0,5 ppg ; 19 points per season.

EVERY. SINGLE. REAL HARD FACTUAL RESULT shows. We get worse and worse and worse the longer he stays.
These are not made up numbers. This is his actual trajectory as coach for us.
Fulham are 10th, 9 pts above so even with a few less injuries no way we'd be higher than 11th. This style of football is not built for consistancy which is why we havent won 3 league games on the spin for 13 months and only 2 on the spin twice in that time. I reckon we'd probably be 11th or 12th which is still terrible and every team has some level of injuries.
 
PPG sucked whole 2024 year. Not only at the start of 2024/2025.

Maybe we would not be 15th without injuries, but 11th instead - still not good enough.

At the beginning of 2024 it was similar - let him have players back people said, it will be again like it was for the first 10 games of 2023/24. Well, we got our players back and yeah, we still didnt look good apart odd games till end of season.

Just don't see it this time will be different.

You really think we’d be 11th with a full squad plus Solanke?

We finished 5th without Solanke
 
Ah good. Thank you.
You say that I am emotional.

Yet you say that in a game where with full time xG of 0,98 "we probably should have scored 2 goals in 8 minute spell".

Of course.
And I am emotional and you are rational :D
I literally burst out laughing at this comment.

So you do believe that we have "deserved" a victory in all NLDs, right? Cause we had possession and all.
And also "deserved" to win both games against Newcastle this season?
So in this "deserved" table we have 6 wins written down. But in real life... you know the one where facts live... we are with 1 draw and 5 defeats. And 1 point to league table from 18 possible.
We didn’t create the opportunities from those turnovers that we should have.

That’s why I said probably should have scored 2 goals
 
Yeah small sample size PPG early in the season isn’t really much to work with for analysis if you want to get much of value. Which is similar to what the OP said,

Do you think we’d be 15th if we didn’t have half our squad out?

Very good.
Again thanks!

Meanwhile I have posted PPG from 60 games too.
Which is also shit.

And that includes all 60 games under current manager.

What about that?
Maybe alternative dxG (deserved xG) ? :D
 
Is it a possibility that Levy, Cullen and co now are just happy with a PL mid table finish and investing just enough to get that?

They’re seeing their riches come in from the NFL, concerts, boxing and tourists visiting on a matchday.. they’re happy to line their pockets with the income and as long as the club has Premier League status, that’s all that matters. Removing THFC from the badge points to that even more.

Christ no, these guys aren't about to forsake CL money which is at least an extra £60m without broadcast revenue, sponsor revenue and bonuses

Not to mention competition money is profit which makes you even more FFP and PSR compliant!

Also when you say line their pockets, how do you mean?

It's basically like saying a millionaire doesn't need to keep investing because he's a millionaire. :D
 
because scoring 2 goals in the first 8 mins is so common? this is why i jumped off the ange train early. the things required for his system to work just don't happen very often. it was clear very early that scoring 3 or more goals per match was needed to win and that's just not something that happens in this league. do you really think we're going to score 100 goals per season? with our squad? it's ludicrous
We won that game 1-0. Why did we need to score 3 to win it?
 
Back
Top