I know a lot here dont like him but I think he's a good player. Had he started for United in the final they would have scored
Sure he would've

Last edited:
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I know a lot here dont like him but I think he's a good player. Had he started for United in the final they would have scored

I know a lot here dont like him but I think he's a good player. Had he started for United in the final they would have scored
I like you. You have spunk. I like spunk.
Ok you got it, you big chunky hunk of cunt.


AKA "anti-Chelsea" loophole patching.Profit and loss minus certain exempt expenses, most notably infrastructure investment.
It's fair enough I suppose, ideally we'd have more disclosure into the full picture.
Our inability to generate funds from outgoing transfers is just an echo of previous underinvestment though, it's a cycle.
I know a lot here dont like him but I think he's a good player. Had he started for United in the final they would have scored
The basic insight that investing in stadia and training grounds and the like benefits the game as a whole and ought to be encouraged makes good sense.
There's some of that too. We need to be more eager to sell for the right price.I don't think it is a symptom of under-investment, but rather symptomatic of holding onto key players too long as a PTSD of being a club that previously had its best players (Keane, Berba, Carrick, Modric, Bale etc) plucked from them, and a lack of academy from the Poch days.
It's incredibly frustrating.It amazes me how Liverpool and Chelsea seem to buy some 18-19 year olds for £5m, never play them, and somehow get lower table sides to pay £30m each for them
In fairness he said "they" would've...
HOW COULD YOU KNOW THIS?!?!
Amorim would have thought he would have a chance of redemption this summer, but that team ain't getting fixed anytime soon
Desperation will set in and they'll sell Antony, Garnacho, Rashford and Højlund for laughable prices...which I'm all for. We should offer £25m for Mainoo even though I'm not sure of his level or what he actually does best
United know the player better than we do, and the fact that as a homegrown who has just turned 21 he's been thrown on the deadwood pile with reports of his bad attitude, it's worrying.I know a lot here dont like him but I think he's a good player. Had he started for United in the final they would have scored
The basic insight that investing in stadia and training grounds and the like benefits the game as a whole and ought to be encouraged makes good sense.
There's some of that too. We need to be more eager to sell for the right price.
It's incredibly frustrating.
United know the player better than we do, and the fact that as a homegrown who has just turned 21 he's been thrown on the deadwood pile with reports of his bad attitude, it's worrying.
But I agree, he totally jumps off the screen every time I watch them, he's the opposite of the invisible nothingness of so many of their high-priced players, a guy who grabs the game by the scruff of the neck.
This is the Man United that sold:
- McTominay, who was basically Napoli's star player in his first season
- Elanga, who went on to be pretty good at Forest and is now a £55m newcastle signing (£40m profit in 2 seasons)
- Periera, who is arguable worth a good £25m+ now
- Alvaro Carreras for less than £5m to benfica last summer, who has just gone to Real Madrid for around ten times that
They will have sold some duds, but it's not like Man Utd are a stranger to binning off players that are good enough and do better elsewhere

Hey , United sold them for less with the hope of getting 10% from their sell on clause....![]()
