I find it hard to believe that Spurs only initially dealt with MGW and his agent to the extent they arranged a medical between themselves without any contact with Forest beforehand!
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Player Morgan Gibbs-White
- Thread starter JDefoe
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
- Status
I agree. I wonder if the problem may be simply that nobody told the Fat Alleged Greek, and when he found out he went apeshit? If that's the case, several NF employees will be quaking in their boots.
I'm confused as to what you're trying to add here, are you continuing the line of thought that the other poster suggested, or are you trying to explain an actual release clause?
If the former, then save your words, that clause does not exist, if the latter, I know what a release clause is.
Release clauses are entirely there to benefit the player, and every single club would sooner not have them than have them. A player looking to use a club as a stepping stone to bigger things will not sign with a mid-table club without the assurance of a release clause for a fee that they deem reasonable, the best a club can do in that situation is talk the player into agreeing on as high a fee as possible.
I'm utterly baffled by the amount of people that seem to believe that a release clause is beneficial to the club, or that players can't be sold for less than them. If that were true then the Transfer Market in Spain would be totally stagnant.
I think this week's saga has done funny things to peoples brains with some of the notions speculated regarding MGWs clause and these clauses in general.
They absolutely did.
But Forest have made an accusation that we missed something, so now we would be stupid not to check the validity of their claim.
Forest were probably begrudgingly accepting of it until someone thought they figured out a cheat code.
Second, maybe... there's literally a tree called Dogwood.
This is my interpretation of events. Which means F-All, but might end up having things fall in our favour?
bastares?You bastar*s!
Better thanBazali and
Bill Madrid being intimate with dogs!
I went to my local zoo yesterday. It only had a single dog. It was a Shih Tzu.
We know there is a release clause in the players contract, the rest can be inferred.
Theybdo not have a contract with Tottenham. The PL can punish them we couldnt sue.
I don't think that happened either.
Fair enough! I guess if the transfer go's through eventually, all will be revealed?
Twitter rumours are saying the deal is close / back on. Don't shoot the messenger, just noticed a couple of threads with it mentioned. Might be bollocks, of course.
Don't unleash this! We'll end up being hounded with a growth of crap puns!
started by himothy,hope its true but cant see anything that hes got right before so probably more guesswork in the hope its right
I keep reading that the fat prick will sell for less to another club.
We should just make a new friend and offer them £60m if they buy MGW for £40m. The rules state he can't play for more than 2 clubs in one season. Nothing says he can't register for 3.
Then watch his face drop when he realises he lost money for nothing.
We should just make a new friend and offer them £60m if they buy MGW for £40m. The rules state he can't play for more than 2 clubs in one season. Nothing says he can't register for 3.
Then watch his face drop when he realises he lost money for nothing.
Give up mate, heel run rings around you.
This is not even unprecedented by the way.
QPR would not sell Clive Allen to Crystal Palace in 1980. So Arse bought him and then sold him to Palace.
- Status