The way I see it, the enigma of through balls could be interpreted in two different ways; with different implications in terms of who the main culprit is.
On the one hand, they could be played both in set play and in transition; meaning that a team doesn't have to be excellent in either one of those dimensions of the game to have a respectable tally. Top 6 are the usual suspects in City, Woolwich, United, Chelsea, Liverpool and Villa; while at the same time:
- Palace are 17th in possession but are 7th in through balls
- Everton are 18th and 8th
- West Ham are 16th and 11th
- Burnley are 20th and 12th
Therefore, such an extraordinary inaptitude like ours hints at a group of players that struggle mightily not only in set play but also in transition; in a way that teams that are heading to the Championship don't. This doesn't seem to be a talent issue when it is being presented this way.
-------
On the other hand, we're on pace for a 20 through ball season whereas Brentford during the last 4 seasons had the following numbers:
21 / 22 : 50- 12th
22 / 23 : 53- 11th
23 / 24 : 70-9th
24 / 25 : 69- 9th
They were obtaining these numbers despite playing as direct as we're doing right now; it's not like Frank has suddenly become a hoofball merchant who stifles his team's creativity with his methods to such an extent that his players are now physically incapable of spotting / delivering those passes.
As you can see, this second explanation by contrast shifts the blame to a completely non-existent midfield featuring a bunch of mediocre veterans and mere teenagers, and to a lesser extent to a frontline that has been ravaged by injuries.
The truth is most likely somewhere in between, where some of Frank eccentricities and personnel issues come together to bring out the worst in each other; but it's a curious case regardless.