• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Vinai Venkatesham - CEO

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Oh yeah I thought CJJ CJJ was joking.

Levy had more day to day control over the club by the end than anyone in the PL had had for many years.

As much as the Lewis' seem like ignorant novices, a perfectly sensible recognition that the Levy dictatorship was archaic and outmoded is part of the whole thing.

Vinai both does not represent ownership in the way Levy did and also is much more distant from football matters. He has Levy's commercial portfolio, that's about it. Replacing AIA and getting a stadium naming rights deal is in his remit.

I am really - but the point evidenced itself in that people haven't got a clue what they are talking about but will use cognitive dissonance to draw their own conclusions. It's a psychological honeypot.

Even by definition, an "Executive Chairman" handles high-level, long term aspects; a CEO is responsible for day-to-day and the strategic tasks, but it's been painted as if it's the other way around.
 

When Venkatesham started work on 1 June last year, he had high hopes.

"On my very first day, what I thought would be a realistic target for the men's first team would be competing for European places," he said.

Even though Tottenham had just finished 17th under Ange Postecoglou, they had won the Europa League, their first trophy since 2008, while the squad was packed with seasoned internationals.

But reality quickly struck.

"If you'd have asked me a few months after I joined, when I was no longer an outsider, I would have told you the club was in a significantly worse state in some places than I thought," said Venkatesham.

"That is absolutely not meant to be a criticism of anyone or anything. It was just what I found. It was very clear that this wasn't some form of turnaround that was required of the club in quite a few areas. It was really a complete reset."

Asked to expand on that, Venkatesham said: "If I had to generalise, I would say on the non-football side of the club, in particular around stadium operations and commercial, that the club was and is really strong.

"I think if you look at the football side of the club, over a timeframe of five years or so, there has just been an explosion in progress across the Premier League.

"I'm not saying that Tottenham didn't improve in that period. But what I can tell you is that when you look at where Tottenham were in many of those areas, compared to where I believe other Premier League clubs are, there was a significant gap. In some areas really quite worryingly so.

"I don't think that there was what I would call a relentless obsession with football success.

"Our training centre is amazing, one of the best, if not the best in the world. But when you look around, it looks more like a five-star hotel than it does a performance environment. That will change over the summer.

"I think there are many areas where the club hasn't got the right level of expertise."


It means nothing now, but Frank's ill-fated reign started quite well following his appointment last June. Tottenham lost just one of their opening 10 matches of the season in all competitions.

But when Tottenham finally sacked Frank in February, the only surprise was that it didn't happen sooner.

Indeed, Venkatesham and sporting director Johan Lange faced heavy criticism from fans for prolonging Frank's tenure for as long as they did.

"There's been plenty of coverage that the club was passive during this period. And that's absolutely not true," insisted Venkatesham.

In weighing up Frank's future, Venkatesham says the club considered results, the probability of the Dane turning their failing season around, concerns changing managers may create in the January transfer window, the fixture calendar and concerns over entering the interim head coach market.

Venkatesham confirmed to BBC Sport that Tottenham tried to entice De Zerbi, who was leaving Marseille, to become the club's full-time head coach after Frank was dismissed.

The Italian, however, was originally unwilling to take the job mid-season, which led Spurs towards making the left-field appointment of Tudor – who left Spurs by mutual consent after just seven games.

"Obviously, we were very disappointed when it became clear that we wouldn't be appointing Roberto on a permanent basis [in February]," said Venkatesham.

"We were then, in the interim market, which is generally not the broadest. There were a number of reasons why Igor was selected: he had managed in very high-profile and high-pressure environments - we didn't want somebody that was going to wilt under that pressure.

"He has a history of making an immediate impact. He has managed in big clubs. He has quite a different personality to Thomas and we felt like something different was needed.

"But of course we were really aware he had no Premier League experience. Was it a risk in appointing him? Absolutely."

Asked if he would accept the Tudor appointment was a mistake, Venkatesham responded: "It didn't work out. I think it's very clear it didn't work out. And I don't think that is in question. I don't think anybody would argue anything else."


Former executive chairman Daniel Levy, who left Tottenham in September after 25 years, was generally the target of supporters ire during his long reign.

But since Levy's exit, Venkatesham has attracted increasing anger from irate sections of the fanbase.

Asked if the abuse from supporters has forced him to consider his own role at the club, Venkatesham said: "I understand the frustration around supporters. I think Tottenham supporters have been frustrated for some time. This is two 17th-place finishes in a row.

"It's clearly not good enough. I think that is rational, normal, sensible, and, is what we would expect from supporters.

"The club had some serious challenges that it needs to address on the football side. We know what those are. We are addressing them. We are fixing them. Those challenges have not disappeared overnight.

"They built up over many years. I wish I could wave my magic wand and fix them overnight, but that is not possible. It takes some time to fix those issues.

"So I have complete confidence in what we're doing, how we're doing it. But supporters are rightly impatient. So I have to weather that storm."

On dealing with intense criticism from fans, Venkatesham - who previously worked for Woolwich - added: "It's not easy. You have to develop a thick skin.

"I'm helped by the fact that I've been in football for a while, for the last 15 years, so it's not new to me.

"It's a game of opinions, and I have absolutely no problem with being criticised. I've got no problem what anyone in the game being criticised, it's just part of the job.

"The challenge in football is that that criticism frequently goes way past the line for players, referees, executives."

Speak to those behind the scenes at Tottenham, they will tell you that De Zerbi's impact has been profound.

Not only in picking up 11 points from seven games to preserve the club's top-flight status, but his growing influence is instilling belief in the squad.

"I think he has made an extraordinary impact so far," Venkatesham said.

"We have to recognize that it's early days, and we also need to recognize that he's come into a very specific situation.

"It is hard to underestimate the scale of the challenge he walked into. And it's hard to describe what a significant impact he has had in the dressing room with all the players.

"I think he's an excellent coach, and we think that he plays the style of football that our supporters and the broader football public want to see."

De Zerbi is expected to have full involvement in the club's recruitment this summer.

Tottenham have held talks with Borussia Dortmund's departed sporting director Sebastian Kehl, while Venkatesham confirmed the club have raised their wage ceiling in the hope of attracting top-quality players.

"The squad needs work and the squad hasn't got the right balance," he said.

"We need experience and leadership and also that kind of physical robustness to play in the most demanding league that exists.

"We need to strengthen the club over multiple transfer windows but this transfer window, in particular, is going to be critical."
 
One thing he does seemingly get right is the state we were in. As fans we've been saying it for years, the football side of things felt amateurish whilst the business side was slick. The medical dept, scouting, transfers, the people we appointed was all just slapdash like it was still the early 00s. Theres a reason the likes of Villa, Brighton, Bournemouth etc left us behind even on a fraction of our budget.
 
Last edited:
I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. There I said it.

It’s way too early to judge a CEO in one season when he inherited a fucking disaster from 25 years of Levy. Yes they waited too long to sack Frank but like Vinai says in the interview, there were probably many factors around why they made that decision when they did. The Tudor appointment was a gamble but when De Zerbi first turned us down we literally had nowhere to turn.

They got their man in eventually and he saved us.

Now it’s good he has said this window is critical.
So I expect us to make some big moves in the market. Let’s see how that goes.

I also like the fact that he complains the training ground resembles a 5 star hotel more than a performance centre. That’s exactly what many of us have been complaining about for years under Levy. Players were far too comfortable. It is great he has said that is changing from this summer.

It seems the club was in a far worse state than even some of us fans expected. It was never going to be solved in 9 months.


But please, get rid of Lange.

Its all hollow words, not substance

Simply a puff piece, imo

Ill hope to be proven wrong over time, I hope he actually does know what hes doing and really does make us that singular sporting entity he speaks of

But right now that reads as empty words, PR, from a clueless gnome desperate to improve his image

As you point out though - he has actually made one or two actual statements, so come the end of the window we'll have an idea if hes as much of a fraud as I think he is
 
One thing he does seemingly get right is the state we were in. As fans we've been saying it for years, the football side of things felt amateurish whilst the business side was slick. The medical dept, scouting, transfers, the people we appointed was all just slapdash like it was still the early 00s. Theres a reason the likes of Villa, Brighton, Bournemouth etc left us behind evennon a fraction of our budget.
It’s very easy to point the finger at Levy for running the club as a parallel world class commercial entity and a completely tin pot football operation - that was very evident to the world and his dog. Infact the way he says he was shocked by what he found shows his football knowledge was next to nothing as anyone who followed the game could have told you we were 3rd rate.

There’s still zero evidence they have any of the footballing expertise required to turn it around outside of an extremely volatile De Zerbi.
 
One thing he does seemingly get right is the state we were in. As fans we've been saying it for years, the football side of things felt amateurish whilst the business side was slick. The medical dept, scouting, transfers, the people we appointed was all just slapdash like it was still the early 00s. Theres a reason the likes of Villa, Brighton, Bournemouth etc left us behind evennon a fraction of our budget.

Not sure why you've put Villa in there. That's very blinkered. Brighton and Bournemouth are, at this stage, where we were 20 years ago.


If any of those clubs weren't suffocating on their revenue and were pushing the top 4 regularly then perhaps, but at this stage Emery is overcompensating for Villa
 
It’s very easy to point the finger at Levy for running the club as a parallel world class commercial entity and a completely tin pot football operation - that was very evident to the world and his dog.

There’s still zero evidence they have any of the footballing expertise required to turn it around outside of an extremely volatile De Zerbi.
I agree. They're talking big and i agree with most of it but the proofs in the pudding. I dont trust them until we see something tangible.
 
I think they're looking for a replacement for Paratici, and then possibly replacing Lange after that, they want two DOF. Unless Venkatesham is sacked and the new CEO want's just one DOF.

Paratici joined Florentina 4th February so nearly 4 months have passed with no replacement.

It's a mess.
 
Not sure why you've put Villa in there. That's very blinkered. Brighton and Bournemouth are, at this stage, where we were 20 years ago.


If any of those clubs weren't suffocating on their revenue and were pushing the top 4 regularly then perhaps, but at this stage Emery is overcompensating for Villa
Not sure how its blinkered to say they've overtaken us. They've gone too far on wages but they are clearly a long way ahead of us currently. Yes Brighton and Bournemouth are at the stage we were 20 years ago, smart, punching above their weight financially. We took our eye off the ball 10 years ago, went stale, lost focus, carried on like it was 2005 and its been a shambles ever since, albeit compensated by Kane and Son for most of that time
 
Not sure how its blinkered to say they've overtaken us. They've gone too far on wages but they are clearly a long way ahead of us currently. Yes Brighton and Bournemouth are at the stage we were 20 years ago, smart, punching above their weight financially. We took our eye off the ball 10 years ago, went stale, lost focus, carried on like it was 2005 and its been a shambles ever since, albeit compensated by Kane and Son for most of that time

What makes them "clearly a long way ahead of us" ?

You know since "10 years ago" we've finished 2nd, 3rd, CL Final, a League Cup Final, won a european cup. Arguably more progress than the 10 years before it. The injury issues or managerial 'mis-steps' of the last 2 seasons are an anomaly and not any indication of our natural state
 
I think they're looking for a replacement for Paratici, and then possibly replacing Lange after that, they want two DOF. Unless Venkatesham is sacked and the new CEO want's just one DOF.

Paratici joined Florentina 4th February so nearly 4 months have passed with no replacement.

It's a mess.
I imagine they will appoint someone as DOF soon and that Lange will be demoted to youth and will be handing over to to new guy in terms of data and the scouting networks. And then by end of window Lange will leave.
 
I imagine they will appoint someone as DOF soon and that Lange will be demoted to youth and will be handing over to to new guy in terms of data and the scouting networks. And then by end of window Lange will leave.
There's also some football execs (not sporting directors, but football people) coming in or have just come in from City. And with some more on the way I believe. So if those people can structure the football side up abit along with a new dof I think that Vinai will quietly fade out of the spotlight to just do the business side.
 
What makes them "clearly a long way ahead of us" ?

You know since "10 years ago" we've finished 2nd, 3rd, CL Final, a League Cup Final, won a european cup. Arguably more progress than the 10 years before it. The injury issues or managerial 'mis-steps' of the last 2 seasons are an anomaly and not any indication of our natural state
Finishing above us 4 seasons on the trot? Finishing 5th and 4th while we had 2 back to back 17ths. Things like that.

Momentum carried us up to 2019, we still had good players from when we signed good players circa 2004 to 2015. But they then started to get old and we didnt replace them. Kane and Son then kept it semi respectable until around 3 years ago.

Our 2 consecutive worst seasons in our history didnt happen by chance. This is years of neglect.
 
Yeah sorry but I'm so used to hearing these nicely wrapped interviews as a Tottenham fan that I don't believe any of it even if they mean it. What matters is action, not talk. So unless we buy serious players in the next transfer windows, starting with this one, Vinai and whoever the fuck is part of that board can fuck off.
 
One thing he does seemingly get right is the state we were in. As fans we've been saying it for years, the football side of things felt amateurish whilst the business side was slick. The medical dept, scouting, transfers, the people we appointed was all just slapdash like it was still the early 00s. Theres a reason the likes of Villa, Brighton, Bournemouth etc left us behind evennon a fraction of our budget.
And the two solid gold opportunities to prove otherwise (buying in January and sacking Frank) he failed magnificently at!

Talk is cheap and I just don’t trust the snake!
 
Back
Top