Regarding Bale at the time they took the money from us dropping the sell on profit, Bale was seen as a flop.Bang away, I think you are getting caught up on certain terms. As for the tension between the clubs, I think there is enough activity and lack of activity between the clubs that points to the fact that regardless of mutual respect, there is some tension. Poch comes to us at a critical time for their club, they got Koeman and all was well, but losing Poch at that time was tough. Then we are linked with Lovren, Rodriguez, and Schniederlin. Meanwhile Southhampton let's 1/2 their squad leave, but draws the line on Schneiderlin and essentially holds him prisoner for two windows. Then there is the Toby situation from last summer as described earlier. I just don't think we are their preferred club to do business with at the current time (and I get business is business). I'm not even getting into the Bale situation and any bitterness they may have going back that far, or the fact that our chairman is likely the worst to deal with in the league. I'm not claiming we did anything to them, or that any animosity from them is deserved, but I do think our relationship is not what I would term friendly.
Walnut, that other Southampton startlet, who Woolwich stole( and who then stole Chambers), was seen to be the next superstar. How comes Southampton didn't take money from Woolwich and still have the sell on clause?
I really can't see how Southampton can be upset with us about that. They thought Walnut would make them money and Bale wouldn't.
We didn't knock on their door like some loan shark asking them if they wanted money.