The squad argument applies because we don’t have the best full backs in the league? What kind of rataionale is that? How do you account for United winning trophies with Valencia and Young neither of which are natural fullback? Or Liverpool getting to a CL semi final with Robertson, Gomez, Moreno and Arnold? You do realise right that a squad consists of more that just full backs right?
As for Sanchez well given that United were 2nd when they signed and they are still 2nd and given that he hasn’t produced any where near the level of form he previously has then yes it’s very easy to assume that they would still be in the same position. To make such a statement is to suggest that you haven’t watched him at United. You have simply seen the wages they paid and automatically think he must be producing world class performances
Poch has undoubtedly improved the team but he had the players to do that. Do you think he would be on the same position now had he taken over Burnley or West Brom? The suggestion is always that he is responsible for their careers, that they woulldnt be the players that they are without him. If that were really the case then how do you account for Janssen, NJie, GKN to name a few? It’s all very selective here, the reality is he inherited a base of players that most managers would kill for. He has improved them but the talent was already there.
As for being a cheque book manager apologist, seriously are you actually reading or thinking about such statements. I’m not the one who is playing out games on a spreadsheet rather than actually comparing merits of the actual sides. Again it is an utterly baffling mindset, we have a built a side that is at least equal to the elite but supposedly we shouldn’t expect them to compete with them because they generate more revenue? What kind of warped logic is that?
We do have quality players, but not enough quality in depth over the course of a season.
And before you or anyone says that it's Kane/Alli etc who cost us and not Davies/Trippier I ask you to stop taking such a simplistic view of the game.
Meaning just because players like Davies and Trippier don't make apparent mistakes in a match, it doesn't mean the reason we lost is because the guys up top didn't perform. There's more to playing than not fucking up. We carried much more threat, dynamism, power and flair with Rose and Walker. Despite what assists or key pass stats will tell you we were a million times better offensively and defensively. We had more width, players unbeatable on the wings who could beat their man etc. That makes a COMPLETELY different game.
Valencia is a top 5 or top 3 RB in the prem. Young has been playing at a good level this season. Not an amazing pair but along with the strength of their attack and Jose's win at all cost style they are good enough. I'm sure most of us pride ourselves on trying to play though.
Pool have so much pace and attacking talent it compensates for their defence but it's the reason they won't finish near City either. I'm confident if we had a home we'd finish above them and United.
Sanchez has done enough with his class. He scored a good header against us. His build up and assist for Pogba against City at the Etihad was exquisite and had a monumental affect on the the narrative of the race for 2nd. He's still scoring goals here and there and helping win key points in the league.
Every manager has lots of players who don't come good.
Very few managers do so well with so little resources.
Very few managers play such young teams (youngest one season) and do so well.
Very few managers have so many players make their international debuts under them.
When he took over us how many of our players would top 4 teams want?
Literally just Lloris.