• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2020 Transfer Thread

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

If you want to go bitch at the current owners than go do it in one of the 10 other threads Tottenham Massive Tottenham Massive has setup in this forum to complain about it.
Surely a transfer window thread is a relevant place to discuss the pro's and con's of the transfer budget our current owners employ?
Or are you just another Airfixx Airfixx who cant handle opinions that differ from your own?
Grow some balls, man. Accept the forum for what it is
 
Yes, because if we then enjoyed success I and many others in our fan base would be hypocrites.

For too long we’ve sat here saying how evil City and Chelsea are. We’d be no different
I applaud your principles but let's not forget we are living in a Capitalist Society on steroids. Any which way you look it's about money. The USA for instance is, imo, run by the corporations for the benefit of big business and politicians, not necessarily in that order. That is the direction globally and I can't see it changing .
In order to compete in any sector, principles are going to be an early casualty. Clearly the only way we can flourish in this economic climate is by dropping away from the moral high ground. The only real question is do we accept that it doesn't matter where the money comes from because we are putting it to good use or do we accept middle table status and be true to ourselves. I'm really not sure where I stand on this
I only know that this is the present situation and it's really sad.
 
Surely a transfer window thread is a relevant place to discuss the pro's and con's of the transfer budget our current owners employ?
Or are you just another Airfixx Airfixx who cant handle opinions that differ from your own?
Grow some balls, man. Accept the forum for what it.
By that logic every thread would become the same screed against the owners because, technically, they are involved with everything at the club. Every thread doesn't need to become a referendum on ownership and there doesn't need to be pages and pages and pages of the same general complaint and counterpoint. It's tedious and doesn't bring a better level of discourse to the forum.
 
By that logic every thread would become the same screed against the owners because, technically, they are involved with everything at the club. Every thread doesn't need to become a referendum on ownership and there doesn't need to be pages and pages and pages of the same general complaint and counterpoint. It's tedious and doesn't bring a better level of discourse to the forum.
If you read back through the thread you'll find the latest ding dong resulted from me being goaded and tagged with a yes or no question. I simply answered and the subsequent debate developed.
And you'll also find that for every post in this thread criticising Levy, there's a counter post supporting him.
So it really does work both ways.

:dierpochhug:
 
Last edited:
Surely a transfer window thread is a relevant place to discuss the pro's and con's of the transfer budget our current owners employ?
Or are you just another Airfixx Airfixx who cant handle opinions that differ from your own?
Grow some balls, man. Accept the forum for what it.

I don't know if you've noticed people regularly debate opposing opinions.... It's represents much of what makes this place tick.

Meanwhile, you may not understand this, but the following:

"You're Levy's Son"..... "Airfixx knows nothing about football"..... and "Oooh, you're hard" as a response to a perfectly un-confrontational expression of an opinion that was in fact asked for...

.....These are not opinions worthy of respect; they're just today's latest examples of the infantile level of discourse that you and a couple of clowns have thrown at me today.

Pathetically, enough after years of back and forth; you (and the couple of dick heads like you) still fail to get even a simple grasp of what my outlook is. Being as charitable as I can, I can only conclude that you're willfully ignorant and extremely immature... You'd rather engage in juvenile piss-taking of some false notion of my outlook rather than have any semblance of constructive debate. So, in fact no; it's YOU that repeatedly illustrate you cannot "handle" opinions that differ from your own.
 
Last edited:
You tell us to look "a bit closer" at Jose's titles in 2016, but then you simply give us wrong informations to justify your agenda. Man Utd didn't beat City on pens, for example. They won that game 1-0 with a goal from Juan Mata. Just saying this because that's where I stopped reading you. I don't know if you mentioned the fact that, on his second season, Jose finished second in the Premier League with a team that had Valencia, Young, Smalling, Jones and Lingard. This team finished the league in front of Chelsea, Liverpool, Tottenham, Woolwich, etc. I suspect you forgot to look a bit closer at it. With all due respect, please study a bit more and then try to look a bit closer at things. COYS
Penalties/1-0 whatever, fact remains City were the only half decent team they played en route to winning 2 cups. You can’t try and say there was no luck involved there.

Yeah, but you’re conveniently leaving out the fact that that United team that finished second also included the likes of Lindelof, Matic, Pogba, Mkhitarian, Sanchez and Lukaku, all players Mourinho spent hundreds of millions on to never even come close to winning anything of substance. They finished 20 points behind City that season and were dumped out of the Champions League by fucking Sevilla in a similar fashion to how we were dumped out by Leipzig. I guarantee you were laughing at how pathetic United were at the time, why are you coming up with excuses for him now just because he manages us?
 
Last edited:
If you read back through the thread you'll find the latest ding dong resulted in me being goaded and tagged with a yes or no question. I simply answered and the subsequent debate developed.
And you'll also find that for every post in this thread criticising Levy, there's a counter post supporting him.
So it really does work both ways.

:dierpochhug:
I agree it works both ways and it's not one side or the other who is at fault. It was just making my eyes bleed when 4/5 pages I hadn't read yet were filled with stuff we've either debated with no "right" answer, or things that have been refuted one way or another (specifically everything related to Chelsea: spending this summer vs. last summer vs. the last 20 years, transfer bans, player sales, etc..).

I'd rather argue about why X player sucks, or why Y player is great because he's going to team Z in the transfer thread than the self-sustaining model of club management we've all grown to know and detest. At least that is new territory.
 
I applaud your principles but let's not forget we are living in a Capitalist Society on steroids. Any which way you look it's about money. The USA for instance is, imo, run by the corporations for the benefit of big business and politicians, not necessarily in that order. That is the direction globally and I can't see it changing .
In order to compete in any sector, principles are going to be an early casualty. Clearly the only way we can flourish in this economic climate is by dropping away from the moral high ground. The only real question is do we accept that it doesn't matter where the money comes from because we are putting it to good use or do we accept middle table status and be true to ourselves. I'm really not sure where I stand on this
I only know that this is the present situation and it's really sad.

That's a reasonable post Spaniel Spaniel - I'd only counter with one aspect of it...

"The only real question is do we accept that it doesn't matter where the money comes from because we are putting it to good use or do we accept middle table status and be true to ourselves."

This is kinda moot as a) the money you speak of isn't currently in the offing and b) we are not doomed to be mid-table.... One bad current season aside we've been a top 5 (or better) side in 9 of the last 10 seasons (+ 6th in 13/14).

Our much malligned owners have in fact help elevate us from being the thing that you fear.
 
I don't usually get invoved in these We-Should-Sign-This-Bloke-I've-Never-Seen-Play-From-a-League-I-Never-Watch threads but having read about this lad in Marca, I'm bang up for it now.

21 goals in 23 league games this season, similar numbers to Haaland. Cool name too

According to Transfermarkt he can play behind the striker and on the left or right as well as a nº9, and is valued at €7.2 million, earning €27,000 a week.




The Marca piece reckoned Kanouté brought him to Europe

Who are you talking about. Bill?
 
For Levy, it's a personal win. He has wanted Mourinho for well over a decade. Now he has him. He's won in his own right.

The one thing I find funny with it though, is that if he doesn't win anything at Spurs then it only points to Levy, not Mourinho. He has won things at Porto, Chelsea, Real Madrid, Inter and Man Utd. Spurs are now his club, and you know what he is like. He'll happily throw Levy under the bus because he knows what he wants and will do what he can do get that.
I'll drive the bus. ...😈
 
If you read back through the thread you'll find the latest ding dong resulted in me being goaded and tagged with a yes or no question. I simply answered and the subsequent debate developed.

You NEVER "simply answer".... You evade, ignore or manipulate....

Your victim act doesn't wash. Your primary behaviour here is goading.

You've been unnecessarily tagging me and shit-stirring all day for fucks sake.
 
Penalties/1-0 whatever, fact remains City were the only half decent team they played en route to winning 2 cups. You can’t try and say there was no luck involved there.

Yeah, but you’re conveniently leaving out the fact that that United team that finished second also included the likes of Lindelof, Matic, Pogba, Mkhitarian, Sanchez and Lukaku, all players Mourinho spent hundreds of millions on to never even come close to winning anything of substance. They finished 20 points behind City that season ffs.
"Penalties/1-0 whatever" is not an argument.

Important to notice that not all the players you mentioned were "Mourinho signings" - Paul Pogba, the most expensive of the lot, clearly wasn´t. Two more observations:

1- It tells you everything you need to know about that United side that, with all the players you mentioned, Valencia, Smalling, Jones and Ahsley Young were still first team players.

2 - In their first (almost) complete season without Mourinho, with most of the players you mentioned plus Maguire, Bissaka, James and Bruno Fernandes, they are currently in 5th place - 37 points behind the leader.
 
Last edited:
Don't lie to me Ricky!
Seriously though, this would be fantastic. .0001% chance of happening, but still

According to those less-than-reliable purveyors of fine clickbait, Don Balón, Real Madrid are in pole position, Zidane's given the operation the green light.

In other made-up Don Balón tittle-tattle, Mourinho has been in touch with his old friend (it says here) Florentino Pérez to ask him for a favour, namely the transfer of underwhelming right winger Lucas Vázquez and the decent but slightly ageing centre back Nacho Fernández (30)
 
I don't usually get invoved in these We-Should-Sign-This-Bloke-I've-Never-Seen-Play-From-a-League-I-Never-Watch threads but having read about this lad in Marca, I'm bang up for it now.

21 goals in 23 league games this season, similar numbers to Haaland. Cool name too

According to Transfermarkt he can play behind the striker and on the left or right as well as a nº9, and is valued at €7.2 million, earning €27,000 a week.




The Marca piece reckoned Kanouté brought him to Europe


I imagine Leipzig will snap him up as Werners replacement.
 
"Penalties/1-0 whatever" is not an argument.

Important to notice that not all the players you mentioned were "Mourinho signings" - Paul Pogba, the most expensive of the lot, clearly wasn´t. Two more observations:

1- It tells you everything you need to know about that United side that, with all the players you mentioned, Valencia, Smalling, Jones and Ahsley Young were still first team players.

2 - In their first (almost) complete season without Mourinho, with all the players you mentioned, plus Harry Maguire, A. Wan-Bissaka, Daniel James and Bruno Fernandes, they are currently in 5th place - 37 points behind the leader.
Paul Pogba was one of, if not THE most wanted midfielder in Europe when United signed him. Are you really gonna sit there and try and argue Mourinho wouldn’t have wanted him? Every other signing that was made during his reign were players he personally wanted. They had all the hall marks of classic Mourinho signings and he regularly spoke about how he gave Woodward a list and he went out and got them. You speak about how his side still contained players like Young, Smalling etc. Do you really think that if Mourinho had turned around to Woodward and said “Ed I need a new right back” he would have refused, considering he paid out 40 million for a 29 year old Matic at Mourinhos request?
The reason United are still in a heap now is because they have a glorified PE teacher so out of his depth he makes Tim Sherwood look competent managing them.

Give your head a wobble mate and stop making excuses for the guy just because he’s our manager.
 
Back
Top