You're beginning to sound like a primary school English teacher.......![]()
That's what bickering with kids will do to a man.....
When you consider I'm dyslexic; it's all the more ridiculous!
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
You're beginning to sound like a primary school English teacher.......![]()
Surely a transfer window thread is a relevant place to discuss the pro's and con's of the transfer budget our current owners employ?If you want to go bitch at the current owners than go do it in one of the 10 other threadsTottenham Massive has setup in this forum to complain about it.
I applaud your principles but let's not forget we are living in a Capitalist Society on steroids. Any which way you look it's about money. The USA for instance is, imo, run by the corporations for the benefit of big business and politicians, not necessarily in that order. That is the direction globally and I can't see it changing .Yes, because if we then enjoyed success I and many others in our fan base would be hypocrites.
For too long we’ve sat here saying how evil City and Chelsea are. We’d be no different
By that logic every thread would become the same screed against the owners because, technically, they are involved with everything at the club. Every thread doesn't need to become a referendum on ownership and there doesn't need to be pages and pages and pages of the same general complaint and counterpoint. It's tedious and doesn't bring a better level of discourse to the forum.Surely a transfer window thread is a relevant place to discuss the pro's and con's of the transfer budget our current owners employ?
Or are you just anotherAirfixx who cant handle opinions that differ from your own?
Grow some balls, man. Accept the forum for what it.
If you read back through the thread you'll find the latest ding dong resulted from me being goaded and tagged with a yes or no question. I simply answered and the subsequent debate developed.By that logic every thread would become the same screed against the owners because, technically, they are involved with everything at the club. Every thread doesn't need to become a referendum on ownership and there doesn't need to be pages and pages and pages of the same general complaint and counterpoint. It's tedious and doesn't bring a better level of discourse to the forum.
Surely a transfer window thread is a relevant place to discuss the pro's and con's of the transfer budget our current owners employ?
Or are you just anotherAirfixx who cant handle opinions that differ from your own?
Grow some balls, man. Accept the forum for what it.
Penalties/1-0 whatever, fact remains City were the only half decent team they played en route to winning 2 cups. You can’t try and say there was no luck involved there.You tell us to look "a bit closer" at Jose's titles in 2016, but then you simply give us wrong informations to justify your agenda. Man Utd didn't beat City on pens, for example. They won that game 1-0 with a goal from Juan Mata. Just saying this because that's where I stopped reading you. I don't know if you mentioned the fact that, on his second season, Jose finished second in the Premier League with a team that had Valencia, Young, Smalling, Jones and Lingard. This team finished the league in front of Chelsea, Liverpool, Tottenham, Woolwich, etc. I suspect you forgot to look a bit closer at it. With all due respect, please study a bit more and then try to look a bit closer at things. COYS
I agree it works both ways and it's not one side or the other who is at fault. It was just making my eyes bleed when 4/5 pages I hadn't read yet were filled with stuff we've either debated with no "right" answer, or things that have been refuted one way or another (specifically everything related to Chelsea: spending this summer vs. last summer vs. the last 20 years, transfer bans, player sales, etc..).If you read back through the thread you'll find the latest ding dong resulted in me being goaded and tagged with a yes or no question. I simply answered and the subsequent debate developed.
And you'll also find that for every post in this thread criticising Levy, there's a counter post supporting him.
So it really does work both ways.
:dierpochhug:
I applaud your principles but let's not forget we are living in a Capitalist Society on steroids. Any which way you look it's about money. The USA for instance is, imo, run by the corporations for the benefit of big business and politicians, not necessarily in that order. That is the direction globally and I can't see it changing .
In order to compete in any sector, principles are going to be an early casualty. Clearly the only way we can flourish in this economic climate is by dropping away from the moral high ground. The only real question is do we accept that it doesn't matter where the money comes from because we are putting it to good use or do we accept middle table status and be true to ourselves. I'm really not sure where I stand on this
I only know that this is the present situation and it's really sad.
Don't lie to me Ricky!
Seriously though, this would be fantastic. .0001% chance of happening, but still
I don't usually get invoved in these We-Should-Sign-This-Bloke-I've-Never-Seen-Play-From-a-League-I-Never-Watch threads but having read about this lad in Marca, I'm bang up for it now.
21 goals in 23 league games this season, similar numbers to Haaland. Cool name too
According to Transfermarkt he can play behind the striker and on the left or right as well as a nº9, and is valued at €7.2 million, earning €27,000 a week.
The Marca piece reckoned Kanouté brought him to Europe
I'll drive the bus. ...For Levy, it's a personal win. He has wanted Mourinho for well over a decade. Now he has him. He's won in his own right.
The one thing I find funny with it though, is that if he doesn't win anything at Spurs then it only points to Levy, not Mourinho. He has won things at Porto, Chelsea, Real Madrid, Inter and Man Utd. Spurs are now his club, and you know what he is like. He'll happily throw Levy under the bus because he knows what he wants and will do what he can do get that.
If you read back through the thread you'll find the latest ding dong resulted in me being goaded and tagged with a yes or no question. I simply answered and the subsequent debate developed.
"Penalties/1-0 whatever" is not an argument.Penalties/1-0 whatever, fact remains City were the only half decent team they played en route to winning 2 cups. You can’t try and say there was no luck involved there.
Yeah, but you’re conveniently leaving out the fact that that United team that finished second also included the likes of Lindelof, Matic, Pogba, Mkhitarian, Sanchez and Lukaku, all players Mourinho spent hundreds of millions on to never even come close to winning anything of substance. They finished 20 points behind City that season ffs.
Don't lie to me Ricky!
Seriously though, this would be fantastic. .0001% chance of happening, but still
I just went from six to midnight.A double swoop for Jimenez and Neves with Meunier on a free would be a pretty rowdy turn of events wouldn’t it
I don't usually get invoved in these We-Should-Sign-This-Bloke-I've-Never-Seen-Play-From-a-League-I-Never-Watch threads but having read about this lad in Marca, I'm bang up for it now.
21 goals in 23 league games this season, similar numbers to Haaland. Cool name too
According to Transfermarkt he can play behind the striker and on the left or right as well as a nº9, and is valued at €7.2 million, earning €27,000 a week.
The Marca piece reckoned Kanouté brought him to Europe
Patson Daka, the bloke in the This is Why Everyone Want To Sign Patson Daka video in the post.
Paul Pogba was one of, if not THE most wanted midfielder in Europe when United signed him. Are you really gonna sit there and try and argue Mourinho wouldn’t have wanted him? Every other signing that was made during his reign were players he personally wanted. They had all the hall marks of classic Mourinho signings and he regularly spoke about how he gave Woodward a list and he went out and got them. You speak about how his side still contained players like Young, Smalling etc. Do you really think that if Mourinho had turned around to Woodward and said “Ed I need a new right back” he would have refused, considering he paid out 40 million for a 29 year old Matic at Mourinhos request?"Penalties/1-0 whatever" is not an argument.
Important to notice that not all the players you mentioned were "Mourinho signings" - Paul Pogba, the most expensive of the lot, clearly wasn´t. Two more observations:
1- It tells you everything you need to know about that United side that, with all the players you mentioned, Valencia, Smalling, Jones and Ahsley Young were still first team players.
2 - In their first (almost) complete season without Mourinho, with all the players you mentioned, plus Harry Maguire, A. Wan-Bissaka, Daniel James and Bruno Fernandes, they are currently in 5th place - 37 points behind the leader.