Are any still available for a cheeky offer?
Capoue would do a better job than Wanks or Sissoko
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane
- Thread starter Moulman14
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Capoue would do a better job than Wanks or Sissoko
Disappointing if he leaves. He has been one of our greatest modern players, maybe not Hoddle or Greeves but elite.
If and only if City offer a huge 150-200m offer we should say yes. I will thank Kane for all the good times but he is no longer our player so not our concern. If City don’t it should be made clear he has a contract and needs to give 100%.
In regard to the Kane sale if we are also getting rid of 8-10 players by the time the window is done including Bale, Rose as within that we have a huge saving of wages and budget.
Minimum I expect is us to get 2 of Iska, Vlahovic, Ings, plus another good CB like Lacroix and someone like Damsgaard or Bernardo Silva as part of the deal.
So if Kane goes we get at least something like this:
Romero
Ings
Vlahovic
Lacroix
Damsgaard
Tomiyasu
Bryan Gil
If and only if City offer a huge 150-200m offer we should say yes. I will thank Kane for all the good times but he is no longer our player so not our concern. If City don’t it should be made clear he has a contract and needs to give 100%.
In regard to the Kane sale if we are also getting rid of 8-10 players by the time the window is done including Bale, Rose as within that we have a huge saving of wages and budget.
Minimum I expect is us to get 2 of Iska, Vlahovic, Ings, plus another good CB like Lacroix and someone like Damsgaard or Bernardo Silva as part of the deal.
So if Kane goes we get at least something like this:
Romero
Ings
Vlahovic
Lacroix
Damsgaard
Tomiyasu
Bryan Gil
1. Spurs do not have to sell.
2. Kane could insist he wants to go, players usually get their way eventually.
3. Kane is worth more than Grealish but he is not worth 30, 40 million more. 28, dodgy ankle.
4. Spurs once dominated. Liverpool have, United have. City are not dominating , Chelsea are European champions and beat City 3 in a row.
5. Teams need billionaire investors today. Spurs have a good salesman at the head but a useless buyer.
2. Kane could insist he wants to go, players usually get their way eventually.
3. Kane is worth more than Grealish but he is not worth 30, 40 million more. 28, dodgy ankle.
4. Spurs once dominated. Liverpool have, United have. City are not dominating , Chelsea are European champions and beat City 3 in a row.
5. Teams need billionaire investors today. Spurs have a good salesman at the head but a useless buyer.
Kane has a 3 year deal, not a 1 or a 2 year deal, he is one of the World’s elite players and last season scored and created more than any other Prem player so selling him for 100-120m is not enough to adequately replace him and with a long deal like Zaha we have the advantage not City or Kane.
Buy before date: Aug 3rd.
No good once the season has started.....
200m (Inc. Grealish inflation.)
.......Or it's nuckle down and get your head straight Harry.
160m no longer gonna cut it.
I'm sorry but this is rubbish. While I love Kane and want him to stay at spurs. What would you do in his shoes? You wouldn't stay because you loved the club. He's not a fan he's an employee and the club his employer. Another employer can offer him trophies and more money. He's not the coward Levy and Enic are. We could have added to the squad and built a team to win over the last 3 or 4 years but we didn't. This isn't on Kane. Its on us and the club.
Not worth it unless we can amass a guaranteed 3rd place finish.
4th should be within our financial capacity anyway.
After reading the telegraph article it isn’t anything new we don’t already know. He still a prick for wanting to join them though
Agree with this approach. Not sure about 200m though, that's unrealistic. 150.
Why though? I get that they are oil barons fc but why does that make Kane a cunt for wanting to go and get garunteed trophies? He's a player who deserves them. We as a club need to be held responsible for not delivering them. We can't claim to have ambition and then waste one of the best talents in English football.
BS.
- Jack is 26 already himself.
- Kane is best CF in the world.
- Kane's ankle didn't stop him bossing the EPL last year.... If they're worried about his ankle: then they can shop elsewhere.
- City are dirty money cunts.
Them paying 100m for Grealish inflates the domestic market.
Reap what you sew.
Not even close to the same thing.
He’s worth 200 million because that’s what we say he’s worth. City and Kane can both fck off.
We as a club? Well that includes him and all of the playing staff, if that is the case. He is an employee who wants to “better” himself. Nothing wrong with that but the club want what they believe the remainder of his contract is worth. Nothing wrong with that either. Doesn’t make him or them cunts
But he signed the contract with his present employer which has three years to run
So he stays or we get a deal that suits us
Not City
And certainly not Kane
He hasnt broken his contract in any way. So the whining about him is idiotic.
