Can anyone contradict themselves more in one post than this? I think not.
Lack ambition = Selling one of the best Strikers in the World
Lack ambition = We must sell Kane so we can invest
I'm OK with Kane leaving, I don't support Kane I support Spurs. I do think if he is to be sold then we should be getting a fee in-line with what one of the best strikers in the World with 3yrs left on his contract should command. If this fee is not stumped up then he's not sold and he should remain at Spurs. Simple as that.
I do also think that we look really slow when he's in the team, I want a high pressing team again, I don't think Kane can do that anymore, so is he a reason why we've been shit (the dinosaur's default tactics aside)?
In line with the above, I support Spurs not Kane schtick, which means that I will NOT wish him well at a rival club, I hope his ankles give out completely and he never scores a goal for them. I hope he fails on every single level possible. You see by wishing him well you are wishing City well. Do you actually want to see City lift a Cup!??! What if we play them in another final again, you wish him well then, hope he gets to lift his Cup instead of us? Do me a favour!
I've never booed an ex-Spurs player other than Campbell, I won't do so with Kane should he leave. That said, as with Bale their behaviour is important to me a fan that pays +£1k a year every year to watch them play for my Club. For some players who have created their brand around being "one of their own" comes certain responsibilities on how to go about your business at your club.