Who said his contract was null and void?
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane
- Thread starter Moulman14
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Who said his contract was null and void?
Must be a good day for meHaha, nice one. Look everyone 2 people on here being nice to each other
You did when you said he did nothing wrong by violating the terms of his contract. I'll admit I haven't seen it, but I think it's safe to say it requires him to show up for work.
No they cant.
A contracted senior player who doesn’t feature in at least 10% of first team games is able to end their contract and walk for free.
That could be true however as I have outlined earlier in the thread there is many reasons to think that we might not get 90% Kane this year.
And it isn't just 90% Kane versus other strikers it is 150m (or whatever the number is) for Kane to be used to strengthen the team or Kane being unhappy for a year and then much less money for him when he leaves.
I never said his contract was null and void, I said I have no problem with him doing what he is doing.
That can't be true. Look at back up keepers. No way they play more than 10 percent of games in a normal season
I don't think any of us know what really went on behind the scenes, so we don't have the information to accurately judge.
It could be seen in many ways . Maybe it’s all done & they’ve agreed not to make it public at the request of Levy so he can be not seen as a chairman with a huge wad of cash in his pocket desperate to get a quality striker in .
Personally , & I’m not happy about it , I think he will go at the end of the window & we’ll probably get Ings in. I’m really surprised if Kane is dealing with this the way the press are reporting it though.
You said he's done nothing wrong. Contractually, he has. We can say that, because his contract isn't null and void.
You support his actions, that's different than saying he has "done nothing wrong".
What do you know nuffing. only what sky sports tell you so all thats going on is speculation. What if his wife or daughter is sick, what if he ask levy for an extra day to sort some shit out, what if his flight was delayed and made home late last night. PURE SPECULATION and we are acting like gossip girls spreading speculation.
15 Terminating a contract with sporting just cause
An established professional who has, in the course of the season, appeared
in fewer than ten per cent of the official matches in which his club has been involved may terminate his contract prematurely on the ground of sporting just cause. Due consideration shall be given to the player’s circumstances in the appraisal of such cases. The existence of sporting just cause shall be established on a case-by-case basis. In such a case, sporting sanctions shall not be imposed, though compensation may be payable. A professional may only terminate his contract on this basis in the 15 days following the last official match of the season of the club with which he is registered.
If the club make that decision, yes. If the player is selected but refuses to perform they cannot then just walk out.
I think we are talking about semantics here.
I think he can refuse to show up to training without his contract being null and void, it happens all the time with athletes and non-athletes.
I have no issue with what he did and support his actions. To me that fits with my saying he did nothing wrong.
Talksport just saying he's been fined by the club. Not sure if that's been verified anywhere else though.