-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer 2021 - Transfer Thread
- Thread starter SchmoodSpur
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
- Status
Why are they so precious about their "ratings" over there? Why even have them if they get stroppy if you use them?One poster on the forum where you must obey the rules has just questioned something "Trix" has said about Kane.
A&C in like flint.
A&C
This again?
We had a lot of this in the New Manager thread and I had to get a bit tasty with the banstick. Having checked, he's been at it more than once so we can do without him or his trolling.
Once again, if anyone else wants to get clever with the ratings, you go ahead, do what you have to do. And we'll do likewise.
BILD are not that accurate but I definitely would take Denis Zakaria as an upgrade on Sissoko.
As there have been reports about it. It's a discussion of hypotheticals. I can see why that would be over your head though.
Yes, if today would be deadline day. But it's not, is it?
The only player plus money I’d accept is LaPorte because that’s what we need. The money part will still have be in excess of £130m
Jesus???? If he’s so good they already have him as their only striker and they’re happy to get rid
Silva excellent player but we’d have to fit him in why bother get the money and buy who we actually want.
As for the rest, don’t call us we’d call you (except KDB)
Jesus???? If he’s so good they already have him as their only striker and they’re happy to get rid
Silva excellent player but we’d have to fit him in why bother get the money and buy who we actually want.
As for the rest, don’t call us we’d call you (except KDB)
A&C and Rob feel that there precious ITK's will stop posting if they are ridiculed, which in fact they should be.
Yep ok that's fair enough if that's your view on how we would use BS - I guess you're saying that part exchange is only inferior because it gives us a very limited pool from which to choose players. But say it was just Laporte and cash - assuming it was the right amount of cash - then surely you'd be keen on that wouldn't you? Given that he's exactly what we need. Say Laporte plus £130m cash, would you accept that? I probably would.
All ultimately pointless I know because none of this is actually going to happen... lol
100%. He'd be a starter for me.
Although I rate him highly, I think we need to cut ties with Ndombele. Third manager (Fourth if you include Mason) who hasn't fancied him. His attitude ruins his ability. Wages and contract kength may be an issue, but the talent is there. I think he needs to go back to France.
Get rid, cut the cancer out of the club and move on.
I couldn't take another three years of this grinning twat laughing at players like Pierre and the like putting in a shift week in week out while he's at a McDonalds drive through orders a Big Mac and fries.
Because most of their mods are cunts and don't want anyone derailing their fictitious ITK gravy train.
As a 'glancing curiosity' sure; to tunnel vision one's stance on the matter around it would seem a bit futile however.
If just for funzies, why bunker down and start casting others as clue-less crazies?
Errrrr that's irrelevant to the point put to you...... We've not spoken of time-frames..... I guess my point is made if you now feel the need to move the goal-posts.
Anyway; I'm bickering despite my better judgement.... Last word is yours if you want it.
Yep ok that's fair enough if that's your view on how we would use BS - I guess you're saying that part exchange is only inferior because it gives us a very limited pool from which to choose players. But say it was just Laporte and cash - assuming it was the right amount of cash - then surely you'd be keen on that wouldn't you? Given that he's exactly what we need. Say Laporte plus £130m cash, would you accept that? I probably would.
All ultimately pointless I know because none of this is actually going to happen... lol
In an ideal world, we'd keep Kane and buy Laporte (ha ha, yes I know).
If we are to lose Kane and get Laporte plus £120m or something, I'd take that (assuming Laporte would want to come here, that part we don't know). As you say, Laporte would be a good player in a position where we are weak. Then we have a good bit of wedge to go and try and get a Kane replacement.
I'm still hoping we keep Kane and tell City to get fucked, but I accept it might not happen.
Yep ok that's fair enough if that's your view on how we would use BS - I guess you're saying that part exchange is only inferior because it gives us a very limited pool from which to choose players. But say it was just Laporte and cash - assuming it was the right amount of cash - then surely you'd be keen on that wouldn't you? Given that he's exactly what we need. Say Laporte plus £130m cash, would you accept that? I probably would.
All ultimately pointless I know because none of this is actually going to happen... lol
We'd be in a much better ballpark than the aforementioned BS + EL + 50m, yes.... Comparing that equation to yours we'd have 80m additional cash instead of BS.
I think not. Ferguson sorted out Cantona who was far more of a rebel than Gascoigne. Gascoigne was just daft.
Sad waste of a player. Would definitely have become. the best playerin the world .
That'd be bordering on pulling their pants down, an astounding deal for us. Laporte and Silva are top quality players.
Assuming we spend the £100m wisely (LOL) it'd be effectively swapping Kane for 4 first team players.
Not going to happen though.
- Status