• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ENIC In or ENIC Out


  • Total voters
    209
Success = winning trophies. Finishing high in the league doesn't get you any prizes. It isn't successful.
Again, that's your opinion and of course you're welcome to it. Success is a relative measure. By your measure above, 80+ clubs in the English leagues are unsuccessful and have been unsuccessful for over 50 years, yet their fans still support them. Success for me (and plenty of others it seems) is doing well compared to your relative position / expectation etc.
 
Aside from a state of the art stadium and a squad which reached a CL final.
The state of the art stadium is the producer of the revenue, not the fruits of it.

And this is why I'm asking whether we've really kicked on at all since 2006.

Alan Sugar fundamentally did not understand the modern football business. He didn't see the revenue potential. Levy did. He knew what Carlos Kickaball represented as an asset.

After fits and starts and a bit of fortune, by 2006 that new acumen was showing.

The argument against Levy's continued presence in the chairmanship is twofold:

1. Everything that's been done since has been on the financial and business side of the club

2. Levy's presence imposes limits and problems on the process of the football side that prevent any further growth on the pitch

The argument isn't that the ENIC project is a failure, it's that we've squeezed all the juice there is to be had from that project, and there's only retrenchment to come.

Forget the project's past. It has no future.
 
That seems to be your MO more than mine, bud...

LOL

You just did it and yet instead of addressing your pathetic response is to ignore it again and try to falsely put it on me.

LOL

Yes. They fluked it. Is that supposed to be a damning indictment of Spurs?

Fluked out a PL title????

No it is supposed to show that it isn't all the evil Oil money stopping Spurs from success.

And it still took them years to catch up to little ol' Spurs.

Years??? Not really.

It was great to see how we had gotten to that point in the first place by having smart football people make decisions which gained us an elite squad.

Chicken and egg, mate.

Elite squad?

And those football people that built it were run out of the club by Levy. Once they were gone we saw what Levy did.

Yes. Otherwise we'd be even worse off in the league than we are and would be flying to Albania on Thursday nights.


No proof that we would be worse off. Everyone above us has European games. Everyone in the bottom 5 of the table has the freedom to focus on PL games.


City have won 3 of the last 7 league titles, with Chelsea winning 2 and beating them in the CL final. The only other winners were Liverpool and Leicester's fluke, and City are clearly going to win again this year.

What's pathetic is pretending that money hasn't made the difference.

Thank you for pointing out that Oil money isn't holding us back took you long enough but the key thing is you got there.
 
Again, that's your opinion and of course you're welcome to it. Success is a relative measure. By your measure above, 80+ clubs in the English leagues are unsuccessful and have been unsuccessful for over 50 years, yet their fans still support them. Success for me (and plenty of others it seems) is doing well compared to your relative position / expectation etc.

We aren't one of those clubs. We're the one with the highest ticket prices in the country. For a club who charge those prices to come and watch this team play, trophies are our barometer of success. If we drop our prices to those of Leamington Spa, we can claim finishing high in the league is successful.

As it is, we're less successful than clubs like Leicester or Woolwich, who actually have FA cups (and a league!) in the bank in recent history.
 
We aren't one of those clubs. We're the one with the highest ticket prices in the country. For a club who charge those prices to come and watch this team play, trophies are our barometer of success. If we drop our prices to those of Leamington Spa, we can claim finishing high in the league is successful.

As it is, we're less successful than clubs like Leicester or Woolwich, who actually have FA cups (and a league!) in the bank in recent history.
So if you judge success purely by trophies, then yes they've been more successful than us. If on the other hand you judge success by average league position (which I do), as well as getting to many semi-finals and finals, then we've been more successful than them. Each person has their own criteria of what constitutes success.
 
Then the vast, overwhelming majority of football clubs in existence are not successful, never have been and it's increasingly likely they never will be.

Why do fans keep showing up to watch them play?

Because their definition of what constitutes success is different to that of a club which claims to be part of the elite and has the ticket prices to match. We want to play with the big boys then ENIC need to deal with big boy expectations from the fans, which = trophies. Not finishing high in the league, silverware. Otherwise the other option is sell up to an Abramovich or someone else who has that ambition for the football club.

I go to non-league games all the time and have a ball, and the fans do as well. They're not trophy expectant because it's a cheap, fun day out. Spurs fans have a right to loftier expectations than that because the club is asking them for a lot more commitment to watch games.
 
The state of the art stadium is the producer of the revenue, not the fruits of it.

And yet required revenue in order to build, and makes us a more attractive club to both players and managers.

And this is why I'm asking whether we've really kicked on at all since 2006.

Alan Sugar fundamentally did not understand the modern football business. He didn't see the revenue potential. Levy did. He knew what Carlos Kickaball represented as an asset.

After fits and starts and a bit of fortune, by 2006 that new acumen was showing.

The argument against Levy's continued presence in the chairmanship is twofold:

1. Everything that's been done since has been on the financial and business side of the club

Sure, but without which we would now still be languishing in relegation battles, unable to attract or pay decent players.

2. Levy's presence imposes limits and problems on the process of the football side that prevent any further growth on the pitch

To some degree I agree with you. I like to think he's recognized his own shortcomings in that regard at started appointing directors of football etc.

The argument isn't that the ENIC project is a failure, it's that we've squeezed all the juice there is to be had from that project, and there's only retrenchment to come.

Forget the project's past. It has no future.

You might well be right, but if we do get bought out by an oligarch who wants to make us a successful toy which wins trophies, you can be damn sure it will be thanks to what ENIC built us into over the past 20 years.
 
In 2006 our revenues per the Deloitte Money League were 104.5M Euro, compared with an average of the “Big Four” of 204.9M. So we had 51% of their average revenue, and were also behind Newcastle and only marginally ahead of Everton and (was surprised at this) City.

In 2021 our revenues were 445.7M, compared to an average of that same former Big Four of 499.2M. 89.3% of the average, massive closing of the gap and having leapfrogged Woolwich and drawn near level with Chelsea.

Our 2006 lineup:

Robinson
Stalteri King Dawson Lee
Lennon Carrick Davids Jenas
Defoe Keane

Our current lineup

Lloris
Romero Dier Davies
Royal Skipp Hojbjerg Reguilon
Lucas Kane Son

How much do we have to show for that massive revenue gain relative to our competition, really?
Amazing post.
 
So if you judge success purely by trophies, then yes they've been more successful than us. If on the other hand you judge success by average league position (which I do), as well as getting to many semi-finals and finals, then we've been more successful than them. Each person has their own criteria of what constitutes success.

And yours just happens to be charging the highest ticket prices in the country but winning less trophies than Wigan or Swansea. I get it.

How many Spurs fans would swap our 'success' in the last decade for Leicesters FA cup and league title? A majority I imagine. How many Leicester fans would do the reverse?

None. Not a single one would.
 

Are you aware that typing LOL doesn't constitute an argument, and often indicates that you don't actually have one?

You just did it and yet instead of addressing your pathetic response is to ignore it again and try to falsely put it on me.

By correcting you and offering counter points you don't like? Okay then.

Fluked out a PL title????

Yes. They fluked a title through winning 1-0 against half a league that rolled over for them to enjoy their Cinderella story.

Sorry, did you not pay attention that season?

No it is supposed to show that it isn't all the evil Oil money stopping Spurs from success.

But a fluke aside, it pretty much is.

Years??? Not really.

Yes. Really. Klopp was appointed in 2015. It took until the 2018-19 season for Liverpool to finish above us. Were you not paying attention during that period?


Yes. A squad which challenged for the title in the toughest league in the world, defeated multiple European giants and made it to a CL final.

Do you ever pay any fucking attention to our club's seasons?

And those football people that built it were run out of the club by Levy. Once they were gone we saw what Levy did.

Says you.

No proof that we would be worse off.

The fact that we were frequently in relegation battles and were worth 50m quid as an entire club is in fact proof that we were worse off and would have stayed worse off if ENIC had not changed our fortunes.

Did you pay attention to that period, or were you not yet a fan?

Everyone above us has European games.

Except for Leicester when they won the title. ;)

Everyone in the bottom 5 of the table has the freedom to focus on PL games.

Yes but they don't have the type of investment that ENIC has pumped into our club over the past 20 years to keep us competitive with the super-rich.

It's almost as if you're not even paying attention to the argument...

Thank you for pointing out that Oil money isn't holding us back took you long enough but the key thing is you got there.

Sorry you still dont understand. I recommend paying more attention.

:contebored:
 
And yours just happens to be charging the highest ticket prices in the country but winning less trophies than Wigan or Swansea. I get it.

How many Spurs fans would swap our 'success' in the last decade for Leicesters FA cup and league title? A majority I imagine. How many Leicester fans would do the reverse?

None. Not a single one would.

Because it was the only title they've ever won, and they have no reason to expect a repeat ever again. They are a small club who are still living off that one victory and will soon get rid of Rodgers when he can't replicate that fluke.

ENIC built us up to the point where we are getting closer to reaching super club status.
 
Because their definition of what constitutes success is different to that of a club which claims to be part of the elite and has the ticket prices to match. We want to play with the big boys then ENIC need to deal with big boy expectations from the fans, which = trophies. Not finishing high in the league, silverware. Otherwise the other option is sell up to an Abramovich or someone else who has that ambition for the football club.

I go to non-league games all the time and have a ball, and the fans do as well. They're not trophy expectant because it's a cheap, fun day out. Spurs fans have a right to loftier expectations than that because the club is asking them for a lot more commitment to watch games.

Sure they are. And in terms of competitiveness they've largely delivered. If as you say we need to sell up to some billionaire who can get us over the final hurdle and into silverware you can be sure it will be possible because we've been built into a global brand with a fantastic stadium and impeccable financial structure that's attractive.

You know why Abramovic chose Chelsea instead of us? He flew over the Chelsea Village built by Ken Bates and saw a sound financial investment.
 
Because it was the only title they've ever won, and they have no reason to expect a repeat ever again. They are a small club who are still living off that one victory and will soon get rid of Rodgers when he can't replicate that fluke.

ENIC built us up to the point where we are getting closer to reaching super club status.

They won the FA cup last season, so they can live off another major trophy for a while longer I guess. Currently that means they're up to two of those (Including the biggest one you can possibly win) vs our zero for the past decade. Fingers crossed for 3 late goals this time, I guess!

They also finished above us last season. And the season before that. Who is living off what again?
 
You might well be right, but if we do get bought out by an oligarch who wants to make us a successful toy which wins trophies, you can be damn sure it will be thanks to what ENIC built us into over the past 20 years.
I'll keep saying it: ENIC have done a fantastic job building Spurs to a place where we can have great success under management that isn't them.

It doesn't have to be an oligarch. Levy has become the kind of dinosaur he once ran circles around. He's out of ideas. A douchey private equity conglomerate that grasps football in 2022 the way Levy grasped football in 2004 could win everything here.

I'm re-upping the meme I made the other day, because it's very true for where we stand, and for your (not entirely unjustified) stick towards transfer-obsessed chicken little message board polemicists.

61rxqu.jpg
 
Sure they are. And in terms of competitiveness they've largely delivered. If as you say we need to sell up to some billionaire who can get us over the final hurdle and into silverware you can be sure it will be possible because we've been built into a global brand with a fantastic stadium and impeccable financial structure that's attractive.

You know why Abramovic chose Chelsea instead of us? He flew over the Chelsea Village built by Ken Bates and saw a sound financial investment.

Neither City or Newcastle were in a good state when they were picked up by billionaire owners. Nor does inflating the clubs worth by a tremendous amount that nobody is actually ever going to pay make us more likely to be picked up.

Nobody is buying us anytime soon, it would be extortionate. We're stuck with ENIC for the forseeable future.
 
Mate, you're the one acting like a gooner melt. Why don't you go join their ranks where you can spray each others faces with spittle and pop a vein every time results don't go your way, whining about how it's not good enough for your sacred club which has a sacred right to win, etc?

Every argument you make is taken straight from their rantings.

:contesmell:
Nice try troll. Go back to your aftv.
 
They won the FA cup last season, so they can live off another major trophy for a while longer I guess. Currently that means they're up to two of those (Including the biggest one you can possibly win) vs our zero for the past decade. Fingers crossed for 3 late goals this time, I guess!

They also finished above us last season. And the season before that. Who is living off what again?

They are living off that title win, while we labored under Jose and suffered for it.

Where are they right now?
 
Back
Top