• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Nice sentiment. We’re the 7th most successful English club, all cups and leagues included.

14th for league victories. So most of that comes from cups.

Your attempt to paint us as some huge club, if not for the incompetence of the owners, is not supported by inconvenient things like… facts.
There's really only one time where we were the biggest spenders in the league, and that was the 60's. At that time, Bill Nick assembled the most expensive team in English Football when he bought the likes of Mackay, Greaves, Gilzean et al.

We've made the odd big name signing, if I remember correctly, Archibald was the big signing we made under Burkinshaw. Ardiles and Villa were big names because of the World Cup, but I don't think they were particularly big outlays. They were big news because they were the first "foreign" signings of note brought over to England.

It's actually a fallacy to suggest that we used to do this regularly before Enic.
 

220px-Henrik_Bothe_plate_spinning.jpg
 
There's really only one time where we were the biggest spenders in the league, and that was the 60's. At that time, Bill Nick assembled the most expensive team in English Football when he bought the likes of Mackay, Greaves, Gilzean et al.

We've made the odd big name signing, if I remember correctly, Archibald was the big signing we made under Burkinshaw. Ardiles and Villa were big names because of the World Cup, but I don't think they were particularly big outlays. They were big news because they were the first "foreign" signings of note brought over to England.

It's actually a fallacy to suggest that we used to do this regularly before Enic.
We broke the transfer record with Gascoigne in 1988. Signed Lineker from Barcelona, then Klinsmann 5 years later. The rot set in after that as Sugar had a hissy fit because Klinsmann left so quickly and he went full austerity.
 
The AC Milan link shows Sarr is clearly highly rated.

But if we can make space in the squad, I think Sarr would really benefit from 6 months of intensive coaching from Conte about how to play CM in our system.

Sarr will probably be going to the World Cup with Senegal, and then we can review at Xmas, depending on his development.
 
The thing is, everyone was a trailblazer once.

Preston North End, Blackburn, Burnley, Nottingham Forest, Ipswich, at some point they were at the very front of football in this country, past performance does not mean continually being at the top table.

I think we have to accept the reality that there have been times we can't compete and times where we have really outperformed too. That is the story of most football clubs.

We have made some good signings but this isn't the time to say we've won the transfer window, there is no guarantee that all of the signings will be magnificent, we'll know once we get 10 competitive games down the line.

The signs look good, but every transfer is a risk and the more change, the more difficult it can be to get everyone playing at their best. We may need to be patient with this new look or the starting 11 might not be drastically different to start with come next season, it is going to be an interesting ride.
Being a trailblazer doesn’t equal top of the table.
For decades we aspirational trailblazers, signing great players and not winning the league but they stopped under sugar and went away for 30 years. Could argue the ambition hasn’t returned, ENIC have taken 20 years back t we are doing it their way which is fine really…. Steady, careful, low risk
 
We broke the transfer record with Gascoigne in 1988. Signed Lineker from Barcelona, then Klinsmann 5 years later. The rot set in after that as Sugar had a hissy fit because Klinsmann left so quickly and he went full austerity.

Gazza '88: 2.2m (Scholar)
Lineker '89: 1.1m (Scholar)
Sheringham '92: 2.1m (Sugar)
Klinsman '94: 2m (Sugar)

We were pretty fucked when Sugar took over only for his bad business decisions and lack of vision to make it even worse.
 
Last edited:
Gazza '88: 2.2m (Scholar)
Lineker '89: 1.1m (Scholar)
Sheringham '92: 2.1m (Sugar)
Klinsman '94: 2m (Sugar)

We were pretty fucked when Sugar took over only for his bad business decisions to make it even worse.
Yeah Scholar messed up and then Sugar compounded the issue by basically wanting to turn us into a slightly more glamorous Wimbledon. But we did make big name signings throughout the 80's. Not always successful but Ray Clemence, Clive Allen, Chris Waddle, Paul Allen, Richard Gough, Paul Stewart came with either big reputations and/or decent fees for the time.
 
We broke the transfer record with Gascoigne in 1988. Signed Lineker from Barcelona, then Klinsmann 5 years later. The rot set in after that as Sugar had a hissy fit because Klinsmann left so quickly and he went full austerity.

Agreed but these were 'one off ' top transfers, not several top players in one window - arguably only the Ardiles/Villa purchases were more than one top player in the same window, and Villa (who was a decent player himself was said to have been bought 'for company' to make Ardiles feel a little more more at home, although he proved to be a shrewd purchase in his own right
 
When has a loan to a non - UK league ever worked out where the player has gone on to become a good premier league player? Genuine question because I can’t think one one example even from other clubs.
 
Yeah Scholar messed up and then Sugar compounded the issue by basically wanting to turn us into a slightly more glamorous Wimbledon. But we did make big name signings throughout the 80's. Not always successful but Ray Clemence, Clive Allen, Chris Waddle, Paul Allen, Richard Gough, Paul Stewart came with either big reputations and/or decent fees for the time.

Yeh, the appeal (from the glory glory days) was still there in the 80's to attract these players.

Couldn't honestly say about trf fees though.... Just wasn't as much noise made about such things back then (I had to look all the previously mentioned ones up!).

Crazy when you look back and think we didn't win anything inbetween 84 & 91....... Arguably as big of a travesty as the Redknapp & Poch eras.... Maybe more so given it was the pre-petro and pre-Fergie era.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top